Mortgage and Lending with WR Starkey Mortgage


The causes of the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and the Great Depression that followed have been analyzed and dissected way to many times. Many want to think that by studying this phenomenon we will never have to repeat that scenario again. Unfortuantely, human nature, good old fear and greed, always rears its ugly head.

I am not going to beat a dead horse, but would like to point out some of the obvious issues we face in our current economic situation; too many of which closely parallel what happened ninety years ago.

The main purpose of the two laws passed under the Glass-Seagall Act was to combat the deflation of the 30s, expand the power of the Fed, establish the FDIC, and stem the collapse of the commercial banking system. In addition, the law was designed to create a barrier to the mixing of commercial and investment banking activities which led in part to the Crash. In the early 1930s, congressional hearings revealed conflicts of interest and fraud in some of the bank's securities activities. The hope was that this law would provide a separation of the entities involved in the business of money and investment activities to keep them from the speculative fraud which naturally follows.

Let's roll the clock forward to the 1980s. At this point banks and brokers were lobbying to roll back the Glass-Seagall Act to be able to compete with the growing foreign market and expand their operations for the betterment of customers. Isn't that what competition is all about?

Some argued for retention and said that to go back to pre Glass-Steagall would allow the former situation to happen all over again. When a depository institution controls deposits, lending and investments under one roof, the control and ability to manipulate a market is too great. Then, as these institutions expand their investment activities to grow their profit, the lure of greater risk for greater profit can jeopardize financial stability and customer's funds on deposit.

Others argued against keep[ing the Act, and said that controls can be put in place to protect the public; that the amount of risk can be legislated to keep rampant speculation from crashing the system. A "watchdog" then, can make everything ok?

The debate went on for a good decade or so and all you have to do is follow the money.  In time the Glass-Seagall Act was reversed by the Republican sponsored Gramm-Leach Act.  This was passed in 1999, by overwhelming support of both houses of Congress, and was signed into law by then President Bill Clinton. Again, banks could enter the arena of investment, lending, and anything else they thought would increase the bottom line, and everybody lived happily ever after.


Remember the regulation, the legislation, and the watchdogs who were put into place to protect the system?

Can you say Bernie Madoff?

Here is another story you will enjoy that illustrates the aftermath of the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act.

Citigroup, once the largest commercial bank in the country, was now able to underwrite and trade such financial instruments as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations. They also established structured investment vehicles (SIV) that in turn bought the mortgages and CDOs. It is said that in 1998 only 5% of mortgaes were sub-prime.  By the crises of 2008, almost 30% of mortgages were categorized as sub-prime. So now a bank could make a market, participate in the market, and sell the market for profit with apparent little concern for the risk involved.  Why worry, when the taxpayers can be saddled with the debt and you can walk away with billions.

How did we get to where we are at? How do we limit the banks and brokerages from influencing our legislators who are all to eager to accept dollars into their coffers? That is the question, what is the answer?




Posted by

Loan on meGUY THOMAS 


LMB# 100018083

WR Starkey Mortgage, LLP  NMSLR#2146



























































































































6025 QUEBEC ST  STE. 110


CELL        719-440-0558                                               

OFFICE    720-489-0712   

FAX        866-561-8915



Opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the view of WRSM.









This entry hasn't been re-blogged:

Re-Blogged By Re-Blogged At
WR Starkey Mortgage
banking law
investment risk
colorado mortgage lender

Spam prevention
Show All Comments
John Mulkey - Waleska, GA
Housing Guru

Guy - While your question seems to assume an answer, I doubt there is one that works.  We could vote out all incumbents and insist on term limits.  That would be a start.  But the corruption is so rampant and extends so deeply into business and politics, the process would be painful, at best.  You also have to assume that the majority will support such change; I don't think they yet care.  Until the pain is increased significantly, most will ignore the problem, assuming that either they can't make a difference or hoping someone else will rise to the task.

Nov 11, 2009 07:46 AM #1
Guy Thomas
WR Starkey Mortgage - Colorado Springs, CO

John, I couldn't agree with your assessment more. When I watch voting results, and see how evenly divided we are between those who think the government can and will take care of them, and those of us who realize that government doesn't create anything but dependency.

Corruption, though, is what I see as one of the biggest deterrents to resolving our economic issues. I know  that politics are almost synonomous with pork barrel, payoffs, paybacks, and corruption. I agree that term limits would help keep some from becoming so ingrained in the system. Changing human nature, though, will be a tougher nut to crack.

Thank you for your comment.

Nov 12, 2009 05:04 AM #2
Tim Duvall
Area Manager at Guaranteed Rate, Inc - Colorado Springs, CO

This is an interesting blog on the historical info that may have led to some of our current issues, thanks for sharing.

Nov 12, 2009 07:36 AM #3
Show All Comments

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?


Guy Thomas

Ask me a question

Additional Information