Special offer

Loan Modification Programs Not Living Up to Expectations?

By
Mortgage and Lending with American Capital Corporation

 1

So, the federal loan modification programs Home Affordable Modification Program and Making Home Affordable have been out for almost a year now. What’s the verdict?

By just looking at the numbers, the results have been less than encouraging. According to HAMP, there are anywhere between 3-4 million borrowers that qualify for the HAMP program. Out of those, about 1 million have been extended loan modification offers, trial or permanent. Of those offers, 110,000 loan modifications have been successfully converted to permanent status.

However, it’s important for anyone looking at these figures to remember a few things. First off, although HAMP was brought out in March of last year, many banks did not establish their HAMP loan modification infrastructure until later in the year, even up until August and September. Considering that most loan modifications must go through a 3 month trial period before being approved for a permanent modification, there hasn’t really been enough time to form a clear judgment on the program.

 

2 During that time, the HAMP subsidies toted by the government as incentives for banks to modify loanswere being handed out to any bank that placed a troubled loan into a trial modification. This is important because banks suddenly had a huge cash cow to milk for practically no effort. Banks are not required to approve trial loan modifications for permanency even if the borrower makes all the payments are time. In a previous article, I wrote about the curious coincidence between the federal government requiring banks to approve permanent modifications before receiving funds and the rate of permanent modification approval skyrocketing. Hopefully the trends shown by Bank of America will extrapolate to the other banks and continue on so people are getting the help we paid for.

If the results we’ve seen from BofA and other banks continue along at the pace of the last couple months for any significant amount of time, I think it would be safe to say that the program has been a success. Maybe not the complete turn around that some were expecting, but far better than the results of doing nothing.

 

Mark L. Ostrovsky
Howard Hanna Real Estate Services - Beachwood, OH
Howard Hanna Real Estate Services

Christine, why on earth wouldn't a lender approve a loan modification even if the borrower makes all the payments are time and lives up to their end of the forbearance plan? Thanks.

Jan 20, 2010 09:27 AM
Christine Hynes
American Capital Corporation - Laguna Beach, CA
Orange County Senior Loan Consultant

The bank decides they don't qualify for a loan modification, it could be many reasons for a denial, from not a strong hardship, too much income, too little income, to name a few.  But remember, the banks get paid to put them into a trial modification!!  So, the banks do this to get the money.

Jan 21, 2010 01:35 AM
GARY DIGIORGIO -Denver- Arvada -Westminster
THE DIGIORGIO GROUP /(303) 898 - GARY (4279) - Westminster, CO
REOptions LLC

Hi Christine,

Seem your most recent blog goes hand in hand with mine....better times a coming

gary D for denver

Jan 21, 2010 09:00 AM
Christine Hynes
American Capital Corporation - Laguna Beach, CA
Orange County Senior Loan Consultant

Hi Gary - I know we are all waiting patiently!

Jan 21, 2010 03:04 PM
Paul J. Molinaro, MD, JD
The Law Offices of Fransen & Molinaro, LLP - Corona, CA
M.D., J.D.

The REASON is that the LENDER makes more MONEY by foreclosing after extracting as much cash as possible from the gullible homeowner!

The trial modification is just another bank tactic to grab money - The banks were faced with upside down homes and non-paying homeowners, so they did what they had always been doing - whatever it took to keep their profits going - they promised to help homeowners if Uncle Sam would give them money, and they GOT BILLIONS in bailout money from taxpayers... they then gave the homeowners trial modifications to make it seem as though they were keeping their promises, and in so doing they continued to GET BILLIONS in bailout money PLUS MORE MONEY from the homeowners who otherwise would never have paid another dime to the banks... then when the time was right to foreclose - meaning the inventory was controlled and the borrower was out of any spare cash, sell the home through foreclosure and GET ANOTHER BIG PAYMENT... then if there was any kind of insurance against foreclosure, collect MORE MONEY on that policy.

This scam should not go without recourse. In California, there are laws in place to address such breaches of promise... and many law firms, mine included, take people who have fallen prey to the TRIAL MODIFICATION SCAM and make them into plaintiffs against their lenders. By joining plaintiffs with similar patterns of lender abuse together, these homeowners are able to afford aggressive litigation against the big banks. Visit dub dub dub dot fransenandmolinaro dot com for more information about my firm. If you are in another state, there are likely lawyers there who can help you.

- Paul

Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D.
Attorney at Law, Physician, Broker
Fransen & Molinaro, LLP
980 Montecito Drive, Suite 206
Corona, CA 92879
(951)520-9684

** Any posts or comments I make on Internet are for informational purposes only. None of the information or materials I post are legal advice. Nothing I post as comments, answers, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. While I try to be accurate, I do not guarantee accuracy.

Feb 26, 2011 06:35 AM