Special offer

New Good Faith Estimate of Closing Costs

Reblogger
Real Estate Agent with Park Place Real Estate, Broker-In-Charge

Excellent breakdown by Starkey Mortgage Branch Manager Ruth Vogt (Colorado) of "New Rules" on the Good Faith Estate of Closing Costs! 

Original content by Ruth Vogt NMLS257576

New Good Faith Estimate of Closing Costs

Sometimes the hardest part about having new forms is that, well, it's NEW! It's DIFFERENT! We have to create new scripts to EXPLAIN it so that our clients can UNDERSTAND it. But first... WE have to understand it.

So here are just a few points regarding the new Good Faith Estimate that I hope will help with that.

First, we have to recognize the old Good Faith Estimate was really an estimate focused on how much the BUYER needed to bring to closing and how much they would have to pay monthly.

Now, we have an estimate of closing costs related to the mortgage REGARDLESS of who pays! No credits offsetting, just a disclosure of the expenses. Let's do a simple down and dirty comparison of then vs now to help get my point across.

For the purpose of ease, we'll pretend we have an FHA loan with a sales price of $100,000.00. Here are the other details for my example:

  1. The buyer is putting minimum down of 3.5%, or $3,500.
  2. Buyer has put $1,000 earnest money down.
  3. We'll pretend the total closing costs and prepaids are about $4,000 and the seller is going to pay them.
  4. And of course, on an FHA loan we have upfront mortgage insurance of 1.75% off the base loan amount, or about $1,700, which is rolled into the loan.

The old Good Faith Estimate, which was created just for the buyer's information, the amount required for closing would show:

  1. Closing costs and prepaids being paid by seller, which would show the credit for the buyer.
  2. Mortgage insurance of $1,700 would be added to the mortgage, which would also be credited.
  3. Leaving basically the down payment of $3,500, less the earnest money deposit, or $2,500.00

With the new Good Faith Estimate, there are no credits reflected. It is merely a reflection of ALL costs associated with the transaction regardless of who is paying them. Bottom line is going to look like this:

  1. Closing costs of up to $4,000
  2. Mortgage insurance of $1,700
  3. Down payment of $3,500
  4. NO CREDITS, so bottom line will be a total of the above, or $9,200.00.

The buyer isn't paying any more or any less. It's simply an explanation of all costs that need to be taken into consideration on that transaction.

Will this leave the buyer confused? Yes, UNLESS we redirect our attention to the residential loan application, known as the 1003! That form does, in fact, give a total monthly payment AND breaks down what amount the buyer will need for closing. Let me show you specifically where to look.

Page 4, Section VII:

 

 

 

 

Notice the credits given for seller paid fees

Earnest Money 

 

 

and MIP financed

Leaving what the Buyer needs for closing

 

And while we're looking at the 1003, we can also see the estimated TOTAL monthly payment on Page 2 of the application, Section V:

So, just change your scripts!

  1. The GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE is a reflection of ALL costs regardless of who pays what.
  2. For the total monthly payment and cash required at closing, look at the Residential Loan Application, referred to as the 1003, Sections V and VII.

Remember, your first time homebuyers have never seen the old GFE, so they don't know the difference. Don't dwell on the change, just focus on new scripts to help your buyer best process the information disclosed in the formats we are required by law to use.

Views and opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of WR Starkey Mortgage.

  Ruth Vogt Colorado Mortgage Lender

 Ruth Vogt, Branch Manager

   Colorado LMB #LMB100023827

   www.MyLenderOfChoice.com

   rvogt@wrstarkey.com

 

Posted by

Doug Patterson  ABR® 

Park Place Real Estate,  Broker-In-Charge

SFR       HUD Certified Broker

 

 

 

Comments (1)

Anonymous
annemnlidaa
Spamhaus a bunch of liars and criminals - Spreads slander about isps and their customers - Infringes on peoples privacy - Sends spam itself (their "abusemails" are undesired bulk email just as well) - Blackmails ISPs to comply to their rediculous "demands" - Actively pushes ISPs to let Spamhaus use their networks to commit computer sabotage (hinder communications with specific other computer systems). - Publicises private details illegally copied from databases Spamhaus, despite claiming to be a not-for-profit organisation, is registered as a UK limited, appearantly with a branch office in switzerland. The Spamhaus Project Ltd. 26 York Street London W1U 6PZ United Kingdom The Spamhaus Project Ltd. Avenue Louis-Casai 18 Geneva CH-1209 Schweiz +41.225330399 and it's CEO and Founder Steve Linford (resident of Monaco) Companies House registration numbers found: 05303831 THE SPAMHAUS PROJECT 05078652 SPAMHAUS TECHNOLOGY LIMITED Spamhaus, despite claiming to be a not-for-profit organisation, sells datafeeds for large scale commercial use for profit. Read more: Complaints regarding Spamhaus: http://www.cb3rob.net/spamhaus-ico-complaint.txt Spamhaus attacks free speech: http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/spamhaus%20attacks%20free%20speech.htm What you don't know about Spamhaus: http://www.oswaldbousseau.com/about-spamhaus.html Spamhaus-org-setzt-oesterreichs-Domainverwaltung-unter-Druck: http://www.heise.de/netze/meldung/Spamhaus-org-setzt-oesterreichs-Domainverwaltung-unter-Druck-141727.html Disclosure on the Spamhaus communication: http://www.a2b-internet.com/spamhaus_spin_tactics_en.html How to fill a criminal complaint against Spamhaus: http://www.bolenreport.com/feature_articles/feature_article041.htm John Reid spam virus block list John Blasik Steve Linford John Blasik spam services John Reid John Blasik spam gangs Steve Linford Steve Linford
Aug 19, 2012 01:27 AM
#2