In this day of multiple addenda, additional disclosures, and mandatory reviews, there has been one interesting side-effect that restores some of my faith in humanity.
More often than not, verbal negotiation is employed as a means of expediting acceptance of an offer. And while verbal commitments may or may not be legally binding, the trend seems to be leaning towards honoring verbal promises.
The result is significantly less time expended achieving a meeting of the minds. In this day of instant communication and the “I want it now” philosophy, this is a great way to keep all parties “talking!”
However, once the deal is ratified, it’s important to get all of the I’s dotted and T’s crossed as soon as possible.
Because the written contract is still the embodiment of the transaction, and it alone remains as the instrument of enforcement should anything go awry!
Point of clarification: Typically, the initial offer is in writing with earnest money collected, and proof of funds or a pre-approval letter in hand. If the deal is "workable" to the offeree the verbal negotiation is utilized during the countering process. However, all offers, including verbal ones, should be presented!
Comments(53)