Special offer

Attack on Mortgage Interest Rate Deduction

By
Real Estate Agent with Star State Homes Realty TX Lic# 0519122

Hello Friends,

In a recent artical by Lawrence Yun (Cheif economist of the National Association Of Realtors).

The debate on cutting back or removing the Mortgage Interest Rated Deduction (MID), is under attack. If you are now or will become a home owner in the future, I suggest that you contact your local and federal officials and let me hear your voice loud and clear, by tell them that this consideration is NO ACCEPTABLE! The overall affects of this consideration is far reaching...........

"Why the MID Deserves to Stay
Limiting the mortgage interest deduction would hurt middle-income earners. By Lawrence Yun | September 2010

We've heard increased chatter among opinion makers about the need to eliminate or trim the mortgage interest deduction. The argument goes something like this: Not only would ending the MID create a deep source of money for reducing the U.S. budget deficit, but in the aftermath of the mortgage crisis, the country needs to rethink its favored tax treatment of homeownership.

However, this argument downplays two critical facts. First, home owners already pay 80 to 90 percent of the income tax in our country, and among those who claim the MID, almost two-thirds are middle-income earners. 

So, when we talk about the beneficiaries of this tax benefit, we're talking about households who are the pillars of federal income tax revenue. 

We would now be asking them to shoulder an additional tax burden, and also to brace for a 15 percent drop in home values-that's how much we can expect values to fall as buyers discount the value of the deduction in their purchase offers.

Second, critics who link the mortgage meltdown to our country's support for homeownership are ignoring the origins of the crisis: unprecedented laxity in underwriting and faulty ratings by credit rating agencies of the securities backed by those mortgages. Through the terms of 17 presidencies, the MID has brought remarkable stability to the housing market. 

Yet, critics fail to recognize why our country has been so supportive of homeownership. Academic studies have demonstrated positive social benefits, including lower juvenile delinquency rates and higher student achievement among children of home owners.

Whatever deficit reduction might be realized by taking a carving knife to the MID would come at an intolerably steep price: trillions of dollars in wealth destruction and a new uncertainty in what has long been recognized as a bedrock of our economy."

Eric J
Eric J - Dream Home Financing - Freehold, NJ
Dream Home Financing

Eric, I agree and if anyone thinks the additional dollars will be applied against the deficit, then they are mistaken. That money is earmarked for other things on the agenda such as free healthcare for those who are paying nothing into the system, etc

BTW, I also do not blame the mortgage underwriting 100%. There have been NO regulations or underwriting guidelines in the consumer credit side.  People were getting into credit card debt, huge car loans and more. All of those payments combined were larger than their mortgage payments. The government does not want to do much about that because if they did, then consumer spending would decline and the health of the economy uses that as a measurement for a successful economy. They dont measure consumer debt. They dont keep track of auto repossessions.

Aug 24, 2010 11:06 AM
Anonymous
Eric LaMay

Hello Eric,

Glad to know that there are people like yourself out there that are actually watching the issues. I too do not blame the (100%) on the lenders or underwriters. There is plenty of blame to go round. I know that my preferred lender has done things justly and within guidelines, however it is not his, mine (as a Realtor), or anyone else but the borrower (as long as they are made "FULLY AWARE" of what the terms are) to take responsibility.

Understanding that "Americans" are a NOW country as a whole as well as more is better, not everyone has been given the full facts before buying. As a Realtor, I do listen and advise (with disclosure that I am not a personal accountant or adviser) my clients to think about "Plan B" when buying. In other words, I tell them that to think about all the "what ifs".... What if, you or your spouse lost a job, What if, your child need a major surgery, ect. My standard quote is "buy like you are selling".

Having said all of this, we as Realtors have a duty to "protect our clients best interest" and sometimes that line isn't perfectly clear, but we should all try. Once we have done this..... then those buyers need to take responsibility for their actions.

The "Grant Programs", "MCC's (mortgage credit certificate) programs" USAA, all require "HOME BUYER COUNSELING". Personally I think this should be standard practice.

Aug 24, 2010 07:06 PM
#2