Government help for housing, or charitable contributions?

By
Industry Observer

There are a lot of things being proposed and being done by our government to help people who can't afford to live in their homes.  Government puts pressure on banks to modify loans.  HUD loans unemployed people up to $50,000 if they are at least three months behind in their payments.  There are government cash incentives to banks and homeowners to complete short sales. 

Although the assumption is that these are humanitarian acts, they have an underlying common but misguided purpose which is to help the housing industry.  That is a worthy endeavor because a healthy housing industry is a precursor to a healthy national economy.  Problem is that the government spending of our tax dollars for charitable purposes does little or nothing to improve the housing market. 

The housing market could use some help, both from lenders and from government.  In addition to loaning money to unemployed homeowners who are behind in their payments, why not lend money to people who are making their payments, but, because values have dropped so severely, are not able to sell and move up to another home?  There could be stipulations that the loan is subject to the owner buying another owner occupied home, and that it be used for paying the cost of retiring the mortgage loan on their sold home.

Our market is going almost nowhere because almost all purchases are by first time buyers and investors, in many situations buying vacant foreclosures.  There is nothing wrong with that, except it is not enough activity to sustain a vibrant, robust housing market.  We need more owner occupants buying homes from other owner occupants, buying homes from other owner occupants etc.

By helping people who are in a position to make a higher home payment, the industry and the economy could be on its way to a reasonably rapid recovery.

 

Posted by

 Mike Carlier  Lakeville, MN

 

612-916-3033

 

Comments (6)

Charlie Ragonesi
AllMountainRealty.com - Big Canoe, GA
Homes - Big Canoe, Jasper, North Georgia Pros

I do share your sense of frustration with the current situation. retail sellers are being hammered with foreclosures cutting their values. I do not know the answer either but some additonal work by lenders needs to happen that is for sure

Oct 07, 2010 05:27 AM
Tim Maitski
Atlanta Communities Real Estate Brokerage - Atlanta, GA
Truth, Excellence and a Good Deal

I guess there's always places that one can find to spend taxpayer money.  One has to eventually step back and question whether this is what we want government to be doing, or whether it is the proper function of government.

Oct 07, 2010 05:30 AM
Anna Banana Kruchten CRS, CRB, Phoenix Broker
HomeSmart Real Estate BR030809000 - Phoenix, AZ
602-380-4886

MIke it's going to take some time to fix the mess we're all in.  I work with sellers that are upside down a lot of it's heartbreaking to see them loose everything - when they've done everything right all their lives.  I don't think government intervention is the way to go.....there must be a better solution.

Oct 07, 2010 09:40 AM
Mike Carlier
Lakeville, MN
More opinions than you want to hear about.

Perhaps government should be doing nothing.  The point I'm trying to make is that our current policy costs a pile of dollars and amounts to the equivalent of buying a dying patient a lifetime membership in a health club.  People in denial of their impending loss are given false hope with the help of our government.  Modifications are dangled in front of people who will grasp at them while using every bit of resource they can scrape up to try to keep the home they are losing.  There is no pride of ownership being preserved.  There is no equity buildup that we tout as one of the benefits of home ownership.  There is no tax savings if the home-about-to-be-loser has no job or is underemployed.  There is nothing. 

If we can lend $50,000 to someone with no job and no credit, why not loan $50,000 to someone with a job and good credit?  They may help America dig out of the housing hole, one employed homeowner with OK credit at a time.

Oct 07, 2010 10:04 AM
Dee Mayers
Covina, CA
San Gabriel Valley, CA

"Mike",

I beg to differ, how will giving $50,000 to people already with homes help the economy?  Wouldn't that dwindle the tax dollars further? Isn't that a charitable purpose?  You said it yourself "government spending of our tax dollars for charitable purposes does little or nothing to improve the housing market".

I do want our profession to come back and come back strong but, going down this path will not only drive up the cost to buy, it will also greatly reduces affordable housing for low income families.

Oct 08, 2010 08:46 AM
Mike Carlier
Lakeville, MN
More opinions than you want to hear about.

Dee, loaning money to someone who has a demonstrated history and capacity to pay it back is completely different from loaning money to someone who is unemployed and a quarter of a year behind in their house payment.  In the first instance, there is a probability of repayment, possibly even secured as a subordinate lien on the new home. In the second instance, there is nothing more than the hope that the unemployed person will get a job before the house is lost.  That's not a loan, it's charity.

The purpose which I'm adressing is finding new viable sources of real estate activity.  We have thousands, maybe millions of potential move-up buyers if it were not for the drop in equity on their present home.  Find a way to port that negative equity, and there is suddenly a whole pile of ready, willing, and then enabled buyers.  The cost? Government loan (or maybe just government guarantees) to people who have demonstrated good payment habits and the income to support the scheduled payments.  That's a lot different than charity, and it would do lots for the industry.

Oct 08, 2010 08:57 AM

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?