A city building inspector was called to approve the progress of work that was already checked by a previous inspector.
He observed another situation that he deemed was done without permits.
So he said that "the buyers should go after the sellers for not disclosing this situation. They should get a lawyer and make the sellers pay for the permits and fines, and to correct this."
WHAT?
This inspector was out of line in stating his opinion especially when he didn't know the circumstances.
This city inspector went to a property where work was being done to replace the sewer lateral and to correct venting of pipes that didn't conform to code. He was the second inspector to come and he was expected to approve the work and to "final" the report. The buyers were at the property at that time, meeting with an electrician.
The house was purchased 35 years ago --- and the sellers have not done anything to remodel the property. If there were any un-permitted work, they didn't know about it since they bought it as is.
The sellers agreed to pay for work to meet government requirements for sewer lateral, gas cut off valve, smoke detectors and water heater strapping. But other than that, they declared that the house has deferred maintenance, that no work was done since they bought it,
The buyers themselves have gone to city hall to get the permit history. They also engaged several inspectors -- property inspector, pest inspector, foundation inspector, roof inspector, electricians, plumbers. They know what they're buying.
The sellers are up in arms and are going to city hall to complain about the city inspector's unsolicited advice. This inspector is close to sinking this deal!
Comments(12)