C’Mon Minnesota Legislature, . . Just Ban Deficiency Judgments

By
Mortgage and Lending with iLoan - NMLS ID#4474 NMLS 79048

In some regards, the MN legislature was ahead of the curve on the mortgage and housing crisis. They regulated non-bank lenders and brokers in ways that other states hadn't even considered. They got ahead of abusive practices towards distressed homeowners and shady loan modification companies. What they have unequivocally failed at is aiding homeowners who are upside down on their homes. Their greatest impact could be with those contemplating a short sale.

Other states have already taken steps. Perhaps the best example would be those taken in California. For some time now, CA has not allowed deficiency judgments in the case where a person doing a short sale was paying off a mortgage that they used to buy the home with. Now, they are extending the homeowner protection to include all short sales. Here is an example of such legislation:

"No judgment shall be rendered for any deficiency under
a note secured by a first deed of trust or first mortgage for a
dwelling of not more than four units, in any case in which the
trustor or mortgagor sells the dwelling for less than the remaining
amount of the indebtedness due at the time of sale with the written
consent of the holder of the first deed of trust or first mortgage.
Written consent of the holder of the first deed of trust or first
mortgage to that sale shall obligate that holder to accept the sale
proceeds as full payment and to fully discharge the remaining amount
of the indebtedness on the first deed of trust or first mortgage."

This legislation almost passed unanimously. It's a budget neutral proposition. This kind of thing passed in other states too (take North Carolina for example) and lenders didn't raise their rates or refuse to lend in those jurisdictions. If anything, their loan originations have increased. It's a no brainer.

Were Minnesota to not be left behind on this, there would be a lot of added benefits. Right now, a Minnesotan is free of deficiency judgment via foreclosure by advertisement. Minnesota Statute 582.30 affords no protection for short sales. Is foreclosure the choice we want people making? By facilitating short sales free of deficiency judgment, we might more expeditiously work our way off the list of America's Most Underwater Cities. By getting rid of deficiency judgments from short sales, we'll be preserving net disposable income that the Minnesota economy desperately needs. Closest to my heart, . . . by doing this we'd be preserving continuing homeownership by enabling homeowners to buy a home after a short sale using a FHA loan.

Buying a home after a short sale has been possible through FHA for some time now. While many investors are willing to purchase and securitize these loans, few have been originated because there are two difficult hurdles in the origination cycle. The first has been proving that the payoff of the lender being sold short served as satisfaction in full. The second hurdle in buying a home after a short sale is dealing with the FHA condition that stipulates that the buyer cannot, "take advantage of declining market conditions, and purchase, at a reduced price, a similar or superior property within a reasonable commuting distance." This condition remains vague but penetrable. Getting past it takes considerable coordination between the Realtor and Mortgage Loan Officer. There isn't a very graceful way of doing this other than having a well trained Mortgage Loan Officer pre-screen the list of properties that a buyer would like to have shown by their Realtor. This list must be scrubbed against this FHA guideline with the buyer's original hardship (Letter of Explanation) in mind. If any of the properties even come close to resembling a similar or superior property within a reasonable commuting distance, an underwriter will kill the deal. Nonetheless, if the first hurdle were cleared, the second one is very manageable. Were Minnesota to enact this kind of legislation, an untold number of trapped homeowners would be freed up.

We encourage you to contact your state representatives and encourage them to introduce legislation that would indemnify it's homeowners from deficiency judgments in the event of short sales. To find and contact your legislator, click on the image below:

Posted by

Charles Dailey - Branch Manager, Loan Officer, Certified Military Housing Specialist - iLoan - NMLS ID# 79048 -  612.234.7283 - charles@charlesdailey.com


Search Real Estate

The Home Buyers Scouting Report® is provided directly to the buyer by HBM II, a licensed national real estate brokerage service company, not to or through a lender. The FREE home finding service is provided directly to prospective homebuyers by HBM II and its real estate brokers, as part of their ordinary real estate brokerage services. HBM II, Inc. works cooperatively with other real estate agents across the United States in attempting to find ready, willing and able buyers for homes listed for sale. The role of the Preferred Loan Officer is to assist in determining a comfortable home price range for Home Buyers Marketing II, Inc. (HBM II) to use when it is searching for property listings within the buyer's search criteria.

Comments (6)

Jim Hale
ACTIONAGENTS.NET - Eugene, OR
Eugene Oregon's Best Home Search Website

All good ideas here.  Good luck on the legislative front in Minnesota.

 

The real question here (and would be there, if passed) though, is deficiency judgments stemming from second-liens.  One might wonder why second-lien holders should be in a better position in going after deficiencies than the holders of first loans.

Nov 27, 2010 11:23 AM
Michael Layton
RE/MAX Desert Properties - Palm Springs, CA
Experience and Trust

Good Post Charles,

In a perfect world we would hold everyone accountable down to the last penny they owe and not have to make an exception. However, it is far from a perfect world, a perfect mortgage market or perfect economy.  Saddling want to be homeowners with onerous debt when a good case could be made, in many cases, that the bank was partially culpable in the process seems rather pointless - not to mention a real deterrant to economic growth.

Luckily California has passed the no deficieny jusdgements as you mentioned, and I hope MN and other states will quickly follow suit.

Thanks again for a great post.

Michael Layton

Nov 27, 2010 11:49 AM
Charles Dailey
iLoan - NMLS ID#4474 - Saint Paul, MN

Jim - You're absolutely right about 2nd liens.  What cracks me up is that we're not forcing banks to accurately account for the real value of 2nd liens.  It the banks were to write down the value of their 2nd mortgages to their real value, the amount of capital banks would have to raise to offset the losses would be catastrophic.  So they let this little accounting matter go.  I understand that but what I don't get is why they don't require something of the banks in exchange.  For instance, principal balance write downs on modifications and waiver of deficiency judgment on short sales.  But no, it's a free ride.

Michael - You're on the mark threading the moral hazard needle.  I'm always entertained when people take a hard position on either side of that fence because if accountability down to the last penny were truly enforced, banks and distressed homeowners would both be broke (and homeowners who were not distressed would find that they were as the values of their homes would plummet further).  You're quite right, it's not a perfect world.

Nov 27, 2010 12:29 PM
Mike Carlier
Lakeville, MN
More opinions than you want to hear about.

I'm not sure I hate lenders so much that I want to make it harder for them to collect a debt.  The lender advanced money to the buyer who gave it to the seller.  In exchange for receiving the money, the buyer/borrower agreed to pay it back and secured the promise in part with a lien on the property, and the buyer/borrower got their dream home.  Now that the borrower's purchase has shrunk in value, the lender deserves to forgive part of the loan?  Why not follow the money and make the seller give it back?  Right, neither alternative makes sense.

The MN legislature may want to consider going after the others who benefited from the transaction.  Real estate brokers and agents, title companies, loan originators all increased the cost of the shrunken asset with their charges.  A law requiring return of all that was taken from these poor "victims" could easily be proposed.  All in favor, raise your left hand.

Nov 28, 2010 01:22 AM
Charles Dailey
iLoan - NMLS ID#4474 - Saint Paul, MN

E.J. - A short sale is a consensual thing.  If the lender wants to retain they're right to collect the debt they can just deny the short sale.  

Nov 28, 2010 10:22 AM
Marcy Moyer
eXp Realty of California Silicon Valley Probate, Trust, and Investment Sales - Mountain View, CA
Probate, Trust, and Investment Specialist

Does not seem right to have deficiency judgments for short sales but not reos.

Nov 29, 2010 06:14 AM

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?