The Federal Reserve has proposed a rule that would disable the most effective legal tool that borrowers have to fight foreclosures, and has rankled the ire of hundreds of consumer and civil rights organizations, state and local legal aid programs, and homeowners' attorneys. |
Myrl, did you mean the three DAY right of rescission? I just looked this up and could find no reference to a 3 year time period. If there is such a long period, would you please send me the source so I can read up on that?
Hi Myrl, I was a little baffled by this article as well. I know borrowers have 3 days to recind, I'm not sure under what circumstances a 3 year window exists. Learn something new everyday.
Juli - The source of the "three year" window was the New York Times article referenced at the end of my blog: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/opinion/29mon2.html?ref=opinion
Bob - When I saw the article which precipitated this post, I was astounded. I thought the information important enough to share.
Mary - I was also curious about that. I suspect the 72 hour or 3 day period we are accustomed to, refers to the cooling off period. However, if a borrower believes there has been a failure to disclose, they may try to rely on the three year timeframe.
Myrl I had not heard of the 3 year rule either. I think if more consumers knoew about this it may be used more often.
Myrl ... the Fed is now gaming the economic system. Even Alexander Hamilton would have voted "no" if he'd known how distorted the system would become. There has always been a disconnect between the "market economy" and the "fed economy" ... and the ordinary guy is the one who is most disconnected! Thanks for sharing ...
Marcy - I kept reading and re-reading the source information for this blog. I think we all learn something new most everyday!
Jack - Aha, you quote one of my favorite statesmen, Alexander Hamilton. And you are right about the ordinary guy being the most disconnected, or just plain shut out of the economy.
I did some more research today and could find nothing about a 3 year ruling. Okay, I PROMISE to do some more research.
Myrl - thanks for sharing this latest bit of information! From one day to the next, I never know what they will come up with next!
This is only maddening if you think that the Fed has the best interests of the public at heart or somehow represents the people of the United States.
Juli - You can click on that link at the end of the blog to get the source information.
Barbara-Jo, We continue to learn new things each day! The 3 year rule was something which had remained unknown to me until the New York Times article came out.
Elizabeth - I think it was PBS which presented the documentary, "Inside the Meltdown" which provided amazing insight into the events at the Fed during the collapse of the Wall Street a couple years ago. I found it fascinating that Hank Paulson and others were so virulent in their beliefs for relaxed regulation of the marketplace, yet were left to sound the alarm before President Bush and Congress, while asking for bailouts, with hats in their hands.
Myrl, I agree banks need to be in compliance and the power does not need to shift AWAY from the borrower.
Hi Myrl, I didn't sign up for another site NYT, so I didn't access the article. I am sure I will find it online. Thanks for bringing this subject forward.
Gary -It seems few shifts have been toward the consumer in recent years, other than changes to credit card rules which came a few months ago. It is surprising however, how few of us actually knew of this 3 year rule!
William - With the link I provided at the end of this blog, you shouldn't need to sign up to read the article! I hope you had a great Thanksgiving!
Comments(27)