I thought I would share a situation regarding a major double standard I am facing with Fannie Mae regarding a potential home purchase.
I have a client that is trying to buy a larger home. Instead of selling his home at what we believe is the bottom of the market, he will keep it as a rental since it will cash flow. I understand that with concerns over strategic defaults, that the lender can not use income (projected) on his current home since he does not have a one year history of that income and that they will have to still count his payments, etc., as a debt. Even with those limitations, my client qualifies!
We made an offer on a Fannie Mae REO and was SHOCKED that it got rejected since they are calling my proposed Owner Occupant and investor since he will be owning a second home! The buyer is going through the HomePath Mortgage program. HomePath is a Fannie Mae product being used to by a Fannie Mae property and yet they are not treating this client equally!
Parts of the problem include:
1) The listing has a provision stating that the home will not be sold to investors for the first 15 days it is on the market. I believe today is day 76 but they are claiming that since the property fell and came back on the market (even though it was continuously in the MLS showing either contingent or pending for a while) that the clock starts over so they can't even address our offer for another 10 days because my buyer is "an investor".
2) Because they have labeled him as an "investor" they are also not going to apply the 3.5% of the buyer's closing costs!
3) The incentives on the 3.5% closing costs and $1,500 selling agent incentive expire if the home is not closed prior to 12/31/2010 and they won't even let us submit our offer till after the 1st due to them determining it takes 15 days after the home is back on the market!
I have requested to the listing agent that they send me the copies of the Fannie Mae guidelines that warrant their response. I am doubtful they will comply. I have checked with my lender and several other agents and they all agree it is CRAP.
I am open to suggestions and curious if any of you have run into similar Catch 22's.

Comments (14)Subscribe to CommentsComment