Special offer

Massachusetts Judge Stops Securitizers from Foreclosing

By
Real Estate Agent 3112649

Massachusetts Judge Stops Securitizers from Foreclosing

A Massachusetts judge has ruled that securitizers cannot foreclose on properties if they do not have key paper work in their possession to establish their ownership of the property.  This ruling will likely go to the Supreme Court. 

Wells Fargo and US Bankcorp had 2 foreclosure cases that were packaged into securitizations.  A lower courts ruling was supported.  2 foreclosure sales of homes were voided because the lenders could not prove that the loans had been assigned to them through mortgage backed securities (MBS).

Are banks mishandling foreclosures?

The ruling will not prevent foreclosures on loans that have been securitized.  Legislation is sure to follow.

We have all been hearing for the last couple of years from foreclosure prevention companies and some attorneys that the missing paper work could be used as a foreclosure defense.  We have also all been to seminars by attorneys who said that this defense would never work.

We will keep an eye on how this plays out when it goes to the Supreme Court.

Key West Conch house

Comments(7)

Mike Morrison
Will & Will Real Estate Brokers, The Woodlands, Texas - Houston, TX

Read the case & the Ibanez case. There are 2 major points of law. (1) have the states(courts) over a period of 20 years turned 800 years of Anglo-Saxon property law on it's ear?? Granting foreclosure with no standing in the lawsuit goes against private property rights.

(2) Here's the kicker: Does *efficiency* trump Property Law??The Us Government,thru Fannie & Freddie and along with the TBTF's came up with MERS. Yes, Fannie & Freddie ok'd MERS in 1999. The thought was an *efficient* process to keep up with "sold & securitized mortgage loans". Well, you see that that idea has us by the short hairs. However, state courts have given their blessings to efficiency.

My thought, too many trillions on the line. THE FIX IS IN. Watch this "legal" problem get papered over just like the Ally,GMAC & BoA *put back* settlements with Fannie & Freddie.(Backdoor Bailout)  

Jan 07, 2011 06:14 AM
Thomas McCombs
Century 21 HomeStar - Akron, OH

Lawyers are paid to create confusion. First, set up an exclusion to the law, then attack that exclusion as improper.

Lots of billable hours.

Jan 08, 2011 02:05 AM
Mike Morrison
Will & Will Real Estate Brokers, The Woodlands, Texas - Houston, TX

@Thomas, Where you been? Missed your comments.

Jan 08, 2011 04:45 AM
Thomas McCombs
Century 21 HomeStar - Akron, OH

Mike: It's a time thing. I come and go.

I "suggested" this post. We need more of these kinds of discussions.

Jan 09, 2011 01:19 AM
Maya Thomas, Broker
Tampa, FL
Please see my client recommendations.

The precedent has been set.  Banks across the United States will follow this decision.  

Mark and Tammy LaRace will retain their home.  

Antonio Ibanez gets the title to his home back.  Either repay Ibanez or re-foreclose.  Will the bank go after him personally?  Massachusetts is a recourse state.  The money is unsecured.  Short sale the home and and ask for full satisfaction if he does not the have resources to pay back the bank.

Was there a break in the chain of title of the other foreclosures?  

Is this the new out?

The new ruling is retroactive... what are the new home owners to do if they own a Massachuetts foreclosure?  

Will the title insurance company take the loss?

Big waves are coming.  I hope we can surf.

Jan 09, 2011 06:16 PM
Dan Rosenberger
Harvest Realty - Westfield, IN

Maya - This is a very interesting decision by the Mass. Supreme Court. Thank you for posting  about it.  I think it will take time to understand the full impact of this decision - and to see of other states follow suit.

Jan 10, 2011 12:40 PM
Maya Thomas, Broker
Tampa, FL
Please see my client recommendations.

Hi Dan,
I agree.  I was surprised.  It will be very interesting to see how things play out!
Maya

Jan 10, 2011 01:06 PM