Admin

Typo-Squatting and Misspell-Squatting - Bad Idea

By
Services for Real Estate Pros with MyST Technology Partners

At NAR this week a very nice realtor explained to me how many mispelled words she published to gain a competitive advantage in search - it was an impressive array of analysis and effort. It always amazes me how far someone will go to game the system to beat the competitor - who can blame them - they just want to get clicks.

I pointed out to this well-intentioned soul that this was a tactic that is not sustainable and may soon become irrelevant. At the very instant Google decides to correct search query mispellings automatically and/or browser companies leverage smart URL corrections [automatically], this tactic will then start to work against you. Advice - when building *anything* on the web, always think about quality and sustainability.

Somewhat relevant... Typo-Squatting Infringes the Anti-Cybersquatting Protection Act

On September 1, 2006, a U.S. District Court in Wisconsin, decided that the Defendants, a group of the Plaintiff's affiliates, acted in bad faith when they used typo-squatting to generate revenue on the Plaintiff's sales by linking to their commercial website. In the case of Lands' End, Inc. v. Remy, the Defendants were accused of acting in bad faith when they attempted to gain extra commissions from the Plaintiff's affiliate program via its website, http://www.landsend.com./ Lands' End sued under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, [15 U.S.C. §1125(d)] ("ACPA"). The Defendants argued that they did not act in bad faith, however, the court did not agree.

Show All Comments Sort:
Matt Heaton
Timu Corp - CEO, ActiveRain - Co-founder - Bothell, WA
Using mispellings has become such a prominent way of manipulating search engines that I expect that search algorithms will use them to help determine spam sites (if they haven't already started).  So having many mispellings may hurt your pages rank for the real terms.
Nov 15, 2006 09:24 AM
Bill French
MyST Technology Partners - Dillon, CO

Matt -

I agree, but see it as a problem for different reasons. Even if search engines never view it as a manipulative tactic, they may simply institute spelling as a quality indicator. Competitors that spell everything correctly would thus be ranked better than lower quality sites. Why would a search company create hueristics based on spelling? Quality; it's what people want.

Nov 15, 2006 09:37 AM
Sharon Simms
Coastal Properties Group International - Christie's International - Saint Petersburg, FL
St. Petersburg FL - CRS CIPS CLHMS RSPS
Bill, I agree people shouldn't intentionally misspell to steal traffic, and also suggest that when you buy your own domain, that you buy domains close to it and point them to your main domain, just to stave off others doing that and stealing your traffic.
Nov 15, 2006 10:50 PM
Bill French
MyST Technology Partners - Dillon, CO

Sharon -

"that you buy domains close to it and point them to your main domain, just to stave off others doing that and stealing your traffic"

That's a difficult idea to agree with or ignore. I can see why you'd want to defend against this tactic, but why not simply buy the misspelled (or similar) domains and then just not make them active?

Imagine that Google developes a hueristic that measures the number of misspelled domains linking (or redirecting) to a common domain. And they decide that say 10 or more such domains behaving like this is a clear indication of a gaming tactic. You don't want to be mistaken for nefarious activity, so my advice is to do what the big boys do - buy the domains to create a defense, but don't active them.

Nov 15, 2006 11:39 PM