Admin

Who Owns the Photos?

By
Real Estate Agent with Keller Williams Realty

So you've hired a professional photographer to take photos of your newest listing (yay, you!).  Do you now own those photos?  In most cases, no ... what you've paid for is a license to use those images.  The extent of the usage depends on how the licensing agreement is worded.  Here's what mine says:

LICENSE AGREEMENT

  1. Grant of License.  This license grants the Client (“Licensee”), an individual, non-transferable and non-exclusive right to use the images described on page 1 of this invoice.  You may not sell, rent, lease, or sublicense the images to any other companies or entities not mentioned in this license agreement.

  2. Permitted/Prohibited Uses.  The images may be used for any press articles, marketing, on-line use, as well as any form of reproduction, printed or digital, needed to market the subject property.  In addition, you are permitted to use the images for self-promotion upon completion of sale of subject property.  The images may be backed up or archived as necessary to complete the above stated uses only.

    You may not resell, sub-license, give, lend, sub-let, distribute the whole or part of an image, whatever its size and resolution. You may not reproduce, resell or redistribute those images for commercial purposes or for marketing use with another selling agent or marketing company.

  3. Copyright.  All rights pertaining to the images are owned by Glenda Cherry Photography and protected by United States Copyright Laws, international treaty provisions, and other applicable laws. No title, copyright, or intellectual property rights in the images are transferred with this license. Full rights and copyright, including but not limited to self-promotion usage, remain with Glenda Cherry Photography, without exception.

Yes, I realize I could make up a much longer agreement filled with legalese, but this spells out the basics of the agreement (hey, we trust each other, right?).  Once you pay for the images, you can use them to market the property (and yourself). You can't give or sell them to anyone else.  I own the copyright and can use them to promote myself.  Pretty clear, huh?

If you've engaged a professional photographer, you need to know how you can use the photos.  Many professional photographers have licensing agreements that are much more restrictive than mine.  Don't let yourself get into trouble by violating the terms of the agreement.  If you haven't read it before, read it now!  

And if you want to read more about this subject, here are some good articles:

Who Owns the Photos? Not All Realtors Understand Photo Licensing

Photos, Photos, Who Owns the Photos?

Copyright and Licensing of Business Portraits

 

Show All Comments Sort:
Iran Watson
Georgia Elite Realty - Marietta, GA
Marietta Real Estate Agent - Photographer

I have had to explain this a few times to my agent clients.  It would seem on the surface that the act of paying for the photos would indeed entitle them to do as they please with the images, but very few professional photographers are willing to do that.  I mean I will sign away copyrights, but its going to be expensive.

Having said that, with the amount of online image theft and the difficulty policing such usage, it really is a matter of trust in many cases.  Sure you can always sue your client, but its a small world and I would hate to have to run down new business being known as the photographer that sues his clients...

Jan 18, 2011 04:02 PM
Team Honeycutt
Allen Tate - Concord, NC

Good question and one I bet half of us never thought about.  Thanks for the info

shelton

Jan 19, 2011 12:59 AM
Don MacLean
New England Real Estate Center Inc. - Easton, MA
Realtor-Homes for Sale- Easton, Mass 02356

Always love a photographer that inserts his signature after the fact.

Read all agreements lol

Enjoy the day

Jan 19, 2011 01:20 AM
Myrl Jeffcoat
Sacramento, CA
Greater Sacramento Realtor - Retired

Glenda - I remember a close friend that got married in the late 1980s.  In her exhuberance she did not read the contract she had with the photographer that was taking pictures of the wedding.  You guessed it, when the photos came, on the back of each and every one of them, it said they couldn't be duplicated.  A few years went by, the photographer disappeared, and having duplicates made became an issue.  The color quality of the originals was fading, and certain colors began to degrade.  Fortunately, with a scanner, she was able to scan to digital.  At first the copyright on the back showed through.  But that was alleviated by putting a piece of thick paper on the back to keep light from going through.  With photoshoping they were able to restore to a pretty good level.  But she still felt strange trying to keep a photo record of her wedding, because of that copyright on the back.  Hundreds of dollars spent on a product which did not last.

Jan 19, 2011 08:25 AM
Mary Macy
Top Agents Atlanta Metro - Roswell, GA
Top Agents Atlanta Metro

Thanks for posting this it is good information to know about photos.

Sep 18, 2011 04:59 PM