purchase investments in good areas with no cash flow or bad areas with cash flow? I have an idea

By
Real Estate Agent with The Indy Realty Shop

With the slow housing market in Indiana, I have been inundated with out of state investors looking to cash in on investment properties locally before the market heats up.

I get asked almost daily whether investors should purchase properties in questionable areas, but that have good cash flow, or purchase in newer or more expensive areas, but have less cash flow?  IMHO, it always pays off to purchase in quality areas and spend more money up front and have less cash flow.  AT the end of the day, 15-20 years from now, these less cash flowing properties will be worth much more, have caused less headaches, and have less tenant wear,tear, and neglect.

I have an investor that recently purchased investment properties in questionable areas, now he is having serious issues with tenants not paying, tearing the place up, etc. now he wants out.  

In my experience with properties I own, it always pays to buy good properties, in good areas with good schools.  I have been fortunate to have started this way in my investing career.

 

 

close

This entry hasn't been re-blogged:

Re-Blogged By Re-Blogged At
Tags:
real estate investing
indianapolis real estate

Post a Comment
Spam prevention
Spam prevention
Show All Comments
Rainer
136,184
Bill Exeter
Exeter 1031 Exchange Services, LLC - San Diego, CA
1031 Tax-Deferred Exchange Expert

Hi Craig,

I completely agree.  It always boils down to you get what you pay for.  If you pay less, you will receive less.  It's just the way it is. 

Dec 30, 2007 06:54 PM #1
Post a Comment
Spam prevention
Show All Comments

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?

Rainer
56,841

Craig Bartels

Ask me a question
*
*
*
*
Spam prevention

Additional Information