Special offer

Sandy the Doorman advises: Don't buy a home until you're too old to live in it

By
Industry Observer

I read somewhere that a well-known financial advisor to the people, I think her name was Sandy the Doorman, has made some pronouncements about how you should sculpt your lifestyle.  It seems that she believes you need ay least 20% of the price of a new home, even your first one, for a down payment.  She also has cautioned that you need almost a year of living expenses in the bank before you buy a home.

If a family with an income of $80,000 wanted to buy a home and they followed the Doorman's rules, they would have a hard time buying a home until near the time they no longer needed it.  Let's say that they are able to save 8% of their income on a regular basis.  That's about 10% before taxes are paid, and it's an ambitious but realistic goal. Let's estimate that their new home will cost about two and a half times their annual income, or about $200,000.

They would save $6,400 a year toward their new home, and they would have enough for a 20% down payment in a little over six years.  The Doorman also says that you need somewhere between a half year's and a year's worth of living expenses in reserve before you buy a house.  Add another six to ten years to save the reserve.  That comes out to something between twelve and sixteen years before they can buy their starter home. 

Ok, so following those guidelines would make a starter home a reality before the first child graduates from high school.  That is, if there are no emergencies that alter the savings regimen.  In the meantime, the ever-increasing rent payment is almost as high as a mortgage payment, and their kids are living in an apartment, probably with no backyard.  They will be approaching or maybe have just crossed forty years of age, and they may finally be able to choose their wall colors and finally have that dog they've been wanting for a dozen years.

The Doorman does not understand the time value of time.  Fact is that you can take a calculated risk to improve your lifestyle in a couple years, or you can guarantee yourself a life of diminished enjoyment for most of the kids' life at home.  The idea that you should save until your family life is in its twilight may need a reality check. 

You can own your own home for not much more than renting, and with a down payment that is considerably less that 20%. Careful planning does not mean that you have to be halfway to social security before you buy a home.

If you're thinking about improving your lifestyle with a new home, call me.  I offer a free, no obligation, strategy session and real estate orientation.  It takes about an hour and most folks seem to have a good time while sorting out their future.  Call me now.

 

 

Posted by

 Mike Carlier  Lakeville, MN

 

612-916-3033

 

Comments (6)

Michael Kitsch
Coldwell Banker - Katy, TX

Sandy's suggestion seems a bit counter productive.  Hmm.  I hope no one is paying for his advice!  LOL!

Mar 18, 2011 08:05 AM
Chris Ann Cleland
Long and Foster Real Estate - Gainesville, VA
Associate Broker, Bristow, VA

I like the way Sandy thinks. And at the age of 26, with a semi-decent job, I had exactly what Sandy was talking about when I purchased my first condo. It's not impossible, but requires discipline.  Fewer toys, but more security.  I can't say I disagree with her.

Mar 18, 2011 08:41 AM
Brenda Whitman, Live in Laramie Real Estate
Live in Laramie Real Estate, Laramie, Wyoming - Laramie, WY
Broker/Co-Owner, Laramie, Wyoming

So I got over halfway through before I realized what "Sandy the Doorman" rhymes with... :-)  I don't know that 20% is doable for most people but I think it is certainly a worthy goal and at least makes you think about how the down payment fits into the big picture.

Mar 18, 2011 10:08 AM
Toni Weidman
Sailwinds Realty - Trinity, FL
20+ Years Selling Homes in New Port Richey, FL

We had to have 20% down when we bought our first house (you know, when we walked 6 miles in 6 ft. deep snow to school-the good ole days) so we worked and slaved and saved- it took a while. But I think people should be able to start earlier.

Mar 18, 2011 11:26 AM
Marzena Melby
Coldwell Banker Burnet Realty - Richfield, MN
Realtor, Twin Cities Minnesota Real Estate

Mike,

I'd love the couple in your example for renters, so if you ever meet them... send them my way.  lol

Mar 19, 2011 01:59 AM
Mike Carlier
Lakeville, MN
More opinions than you want to hear about.

My personal first time buying experience was ill-planned and poorly executed.  Managed to save enough to buy a house in just under five years.  It took two full time and one part time job with wife home caring for the child, then children.  We bought the first house we saw, new construction, with just a few hundred dollars short of 20% down.  Not a word was said by finance person or sales person about saving mortgage insurance with just a little more down, or a little lower priced home (there were several in the development).  After moving in, I lost my job and we struggled for a few years.  If we had followed the hallowed "expert guidelines" and waited until we had a half year's expenses in the bank, the price of the home would have increased to the point that we would possibly never be able to afford one. 

An exceptional person with little current financial responsibility can aspire to the perfect economic scenario.  That describes around five percent of the population.  If the housing industry can exist selling homes to five percent of the population, that would be fine.  It's not possible, and it is not practical either. 

If you save for eight years, you can save the 20% etc.  If you buy a home today with 5% down, in eight years, you will have paid down the loan to 20% equity and you will have lived in it for eight years.  Rich financial authorities never seem to consider lifestyle degradation or the time value of time.

Mar 19, 2011 02:31 AM