Special offer

The Three Kinds Of Mortgage Lenders You Need Today--Your Commission Could Depend On It

By
Mortgage and Lending with Branch Manager NMLS 557050

One of my favorite agents that I work with is Harry.  Harry is a 20 year real estate veteran. 

Now I don't think Harry has ever done a lot of volume but you can tell he is a guy who is very serious about his business.   

You know a Harry.    Harry knows every line in every disclosure and contract.  Harry stays up on all of the legislation.   Harry wears his name tag all day, every day.   Harry is in a lot of groups and associations.   Harry can tell you details from every transaction he has ever done.  Real estate is not just a job for Harry. 

What makes Harry so great, aside from the fact that he is one of the best agents I have ever worked with, is how brutally honest he can be.

When I first met Harry, about four years ago, he was the listing agent on a transaction where I was the buyer's lender.   As I have always done, I emailed the listing agent all of my contact information and then I followed that up with a phone call to introduce myself.

"Harry, I am Aaron Gordon, the lender for Mr. and Mrs. Martin, on their transaction.  I just wanted to call and introduce myself and make sure you got my email.  By the way, I hope I can earn your referral business as well," I said. 

They call that "referral language."  If you have ever paid one dollar for professional coaching, that's their top tip. "Ask for referrals every chance you get," they tell you.  

What they don't tell you is that when you run into a vet with a lifetime of experience like Harry he can make you feel like the world's biggest schmuck for saying those words at the wrong time.

"You haven't even closed one transaction and you are already asking for MY business?" he scolded.  "Close this one first before you ask that question!!"   Then he hung up.

Needless to say, I ran into the office of the processor who was on my team at the time and said, "If you ever close one loan on time in your life, make it this one!"  She came through.   I didn't call Harry.

About a year later, we were on opposite sides of a transaction again.  When I saw his name on the contract as the listing agent, I wanted to crawl under my desk.   About three days later I built up the nerve to send the email again.  It took about four more days to work up the courage to make that follow-up call. 

He and I had a very nice conversation.   We talked about the market, we talked about Hawaii, which he loves. and we talked about investing in small apartment buildings, which I was looking to do with a group of friends at the time. 

I learned a lot from Harry in that short conversation, not only about hot spots on all the islands, but also about real estate investing.   NOW, I was in referral language position. 

"Harry, so who is your preferred lender?" I asked. 

"What kind of lender are you? Broker or banker?" he asked me.  

"I am a direct lender.  A mortgage banker."  

"Are you correspondent or retail?" he asked. "Correspondent," I said.

"I use three lenders.  I am looking for a new correspondent though," he said.  So we set up a meeting.  

In this meeting, I was all geared up to crush those other two lenders.  I was prepared to tell Harry why now that he had me, he didn't need those other guys.   But once again, Harry taught me something valuable.  And, today, more than ever, I think this is valuable information for us all.

He told me he has always had three lenders in his referral chain.  One retail lender.  One correspondant lender.  And one broker.

Three years ago I thought that was silly.  Most of us offered the same products, and I was even more bummed when he told me that although I would be the new correspondant on his team, I would be in second position.  His initial recommendation was, and is today, the lender at the big, brand-name bank.  He trusted them most.  His clients knew the company.  I understood that.

In today's stricter lending climate, I believe its more important than ever that your buyers have lending options. Your commission depends on it.

Therefore its important that you understand that there are three primary types of lenders out there today.  The three that make up Harry's team so that you can understand the difference. 

THE MORTGAGE BROKER

They broker loans as a middleman between you and the bank.  They have the ability to shop your loan to a multitude of wholesale banks like Countrywide, Wells Fargo, WAMU, Citibank, Chase, etc.   However, they cannot approve you loan in-house.  After they process it. they have to send it to an underwriter at the bank that they want to approve and fund your loan.   The advantage is that the harder your loan to place, the more options they may have, but the disadvantage is they have the least control over your loans closing of the three.  Once they send the file to the bank, its out of their hands.

THE CORRESPONDENT LENDER, MORTGAGE BANKER OR DIRECT LENDER

They have relationships with different divisions of the wholesale banks.  Banks like Countrywide, Wells, WAMU, Citi, etc.  They have what's called a correspondent relationship with them.    They process, underwrite and fund their own loans.  Then they have a contract that allows them to sell these loans, after funding, to the bigger banks.  I have spent most of my career in this area.  The advantage is that you get the most of the options of the broker, but you also get the control of the decision maker being in-house.  The disadvantage today is that this is the chain hit hardest by the recent credit crunch.   Many of these have gone out of business or have limited the loans they will allow to be funded in-house.

THE RETAIL DIRECT MORTGAGE BANKER 

This is Countrywide, WAMU, Wells Fargo, Bank of America.  Consumer-direct.   They process, underwrite and fund in-house and offer the most control.   Plus, you get the security of the brand name.  The disadvantage is you may not get the same selection of more challenging loan products at the retail level.   However, in recent months there is nowhere near the difference there was even six months ago. 

It used to be that a Bank of America product was the same no matter which channel you got it through; broker, correspondent or retail direct.  

And that's why I didn't agree with Harry's three-man team at the time.  We could all sell the same products so, to me, who you chose came down to experience and confidence in getting the deal done.  You could get away with one or two referral partners.

Today, thats not always the case.   The banks have reduced the guidelines in many cases to encourage you to go direct.   Some senior executives at these banks believe that a lot of today's challenges were created by the loss of control in the loan process.   As a result there may be different and stricter guidelines and loans at the different channels.

I have recently changed affiliations and am now at a retail bank.  I made this change because of the recent constriction of loan products.  In my opinion, based on my client base, I felt it was important to be at a big, name-brand, retail bank. 

However, that was a personal decision for me, not a statement on the industry.  By the way, as a result of my decision, I have lost Harry, as a client, for now.   Although he praised my decision and thinks it was the right move for me, he already has his guy at the bank where I moved and they have been together for more than 10 years. 

But that's the point.  And the one Harry made years before its time.  In today's market, you cannot afford to lose a single prospect that could have qualified for a loan if you had the right referral team. 

So today, I believe its important you do what Harry does and seek out three lenders across these lending channels for your team of lending advisors.   

You want the experienced retail guy at the big, brand name because I believe that's important for buyer confidence, product variety, quick turnaround times and the best of loan control.  

You want the experienced correspondent who you can call on if the retail guy waffles on his ability to close this loan or the buyer seems too challenged.   The correspondent may have a few more options and similar control.

You want the experienced broker when you know you face a major challenge, you need as many options as possible, and are willing to give up some loan control in order to make sure the deal gets in front of as many banks as possible.

In fact, I don't think it hurts to show the loan to all three to see what they all say.

If none of those guys can come through, at least you know, you did everything possible to save the transaction and your commission and, in today's market, I can think of nothing more important.   

 

 

Anonymous
Paul McFadden

Thanks, Aaron.  Great post!  As much as we'd like to be the only game in town, I think it's important that people look at all the options.  The cream always rises to the top anyway!  Have a great day.

 

Paul

Oct 12, 2007 02:00 AM
#1
Rey Gallegos
Supreme Lending (NMLS ID #2129) - Las Vegas, NV
FHA, VA, Home Loans Las Vegas, NV

Aaron,

Well written.  I did not know you had changed places.  Was this before you got onto AR or since?

Oct 12, 2007 07:52 AM
Fran Gaspari
Patriot Land Transfer, Inc. - Limerick, PA
"The Title Man" - Title Insurance - PA & NJ

Aaron,

Great post! I bookmarked and gave it a 5! Great primer to show new comers! Thanks,   Fran

Oct 12, 2007 08:51 AM
Keith Perry
Coldwell Banker - Hiram, GA
REALTOR - West Metro Atlanta
Super post!! Always good to have options.
Oct 12, 2007 09:00 AM
Jeff Belonger
Social Media - Infinity Home Mortgage Company, Inc - Cherry Hill, NJ
The FHA Expert - FHA Loans - FHA mortgages - USDA loans - VA Loans
  • Aaron....   good post and thought provoking. But I am going to disagree a little on the 3 choices. Yes, many people like the big name. But big is not always better. It also comes down to the loan officer. Now, being at a big lender or bank does have it's positives. The only three that I could figure out is.....
  • The banks name...  recognition.
  • The ability to lend in all 50 states.
  • Most importantly....   ex. Bank of America has a few programs that nobody else can touch. Some larger lenders can do this.

Now, on another note...  I think the only other decision would be the banker who has broker capabilities. Meaning... the company that I work for, we are a banker. We underwrite and fund our own loans. We have full control as the large companies do. But we can also broker out and not fund and or underwrite in our name. Meaning, that we are signed up with your Countrywide, WAMU, GMAC, and several other companies... plus all the subprime lenders.  I have best of both worlds.

Lastly.... some of these bigger companies either have their own subprime divisions or broker to a few. But they aren't as aggressive on these types of loans if placing them within their company. On the other hand, I have access to everyone if need be. This puts me up one. And this was even a bigger issue before the subprime meltdown.

Overall, this is just my opinion. Not putting true brokers down. But having the ability to do both I think is the best example period. One last note....  my company can be more aggressive on manually underwritten loans than some of the bigger lenders. I have done loans that were denied by larger lenders/banks. They have more volume so sometimes they don't go after the person with less than perfect credit.  Again, just my thoughts and opinions.

jeff belonger

Oct 12, 2007 08:30 PM
Aaron Gordon
Branch Manager - Las Vegas, NV
Home Loan Consultant - Las Vegas, NV

I think options are the way, Paul.  It certainly doesnt hurt and you are right.   The three lenders likely wont have equal talents so you will lean on the best one anyway.

 Thanks, Rey!  I made the switch about a month ago.  I was already here on AR.  Give me a call to discuss and I will tell you about it.

Thank, Fran.  I appreciate that!!

Keith and Robin---I thinks it very important today.

 

Oct 13, 2007 03:19 AM
Aaron Gordon
Branch Manager - Las Vegas, NV
Home Loan Consultant - Las Vegas, NV

I used to think the exact same way as you Jeff.  I come from the same world. 

First let me say that one point you make is excellent.  No matter the channel, it ALWAYS comes down to the loan officer.   There are talented people in each channel and its important that you have them on your team.

At the retail bank I am now at, I got a call this past week from a client who tried to get his loan done at my bank with another LO in another state.  They told him his loan couldn't be done.   I was able to get it done.  He asked me how I was able to when another at the same bank wasn't and the answer was simply, I understand the loan programs and options better.

I have only recently changed my opinion and that's when I considered the move.  Here is why. 

I think in times of uncertainty, people look for stability and have a better comfort level with the brand name banks.  

Next, because today we live in a Fannie, Freddie, FHA, VA dominated world again, and all the big banks do those loans too, there is not as much product difference between channels today.

In addition, like you point out, the big banks have some of their own products like Acorn, House America, etc. that do differentiate them.

Finally, although the correspondent channel does have the ability to offer many of the banks products, offering the "best of both worlds," today the big banks have different guidelines for retail, correspondent, and broker. 

In some cases, the correspondent guidelines are the most conservative of the three because the bank has zero control over the loan. 

So although you are offering Wells Fargo's products, you may be limited to 90% on a loan that the client can walk into the bank and get at 95%.   Or you may be limited to a 680 score on a product he can do at 660 by calling the retail guy or the broker.   The banks are stretching these differences further every day.

At my bank, the program guidelines show us three matrices for all products.  Retail, correspondent, and wholesale (broker).   They are far different in most cases. 

However, that doesn't mean that if you are limited to 90 with the B of A loan you cant do 95 at Wells, so thats why I think its important to have as many options as possible.

And I don't want to put brokers down either.  There are many talented brokers.  However, in my experience, they are the last of the three options for most real estate agents I know, because of the lack of control, but in today's market they may be able to offer some unique choices from some smaller regional banks so I think its important to have one on your team too.

The bottom line is options.   You need all the options you can get today.

 

Oct 13, 2007 03:41 AM
Jeff Belonger
Social Media - Infinity Home Mortgage Company, Inc - Cherry Hill, NJ
The FHA Expert - FHA Loans - FHA mortgages - USDA loans - VA Loans

Aaron....   I think you missed some of what I had mentioned. I am considered a Mortgage Banker without the big name. But we underwrite our own loans in-house. I have the ability to broker out if need be. So, we aren't following an investor"s guidelines. 

Yes, the larger banks have some of their own programs. But overall, I don't lose much business to that, because some of those loan officers just sell that type of loan, their specialty loan and forget about the basics. Look at Wachovia, they are advertising the hell out of the Pay Option Arm.... and the commercial is very misleading.

Overall, I have 99% of the options, in-house. And something that I will usually have a leg up on the larger bank or lender is the subprime stuff. It's great that you feel comfortable where you are at. And as stated in your example, that you could do this specific loan.... I get the same questions when others get turned down. How can you do it and what makes you different from the lender that denied me...  As you mentioned, it's because we know the ins and outs... but not only the guidelines, but I know what my underwriters will take, the risk factor, and what compensating factors that I need...   good post.

jeff belonger

Oct 13, 2007 04:43 AM
Shane Leady
Apella Business Solutions - Zolfo Springs, FL

Jeff,

Thank you for this post. As an appraiser I was aware of the three but I must say two things here.  Thank you for the reminder and that is one of the best blog post I have read.  I read a ton of blog post in and out of the rain.  I need to refer several people to this post.

Please keep up the great work.

Oct 13, 2007 12:02 PM
Aaron Gordon
Branch Manager - Las Vegas, NV
Home Loan Consultant - Las Vegas, NV

Thanks, Jeff!  So you guys have an internal set of guidelines you underwriter to?  Are you then selling the loans in bulk and brokering the rest?

Shane, I am not sure if you are responding to Jeff's replies or my post but nonetheless, thanks!

Oct 13, 2007 12:16 PM
Jeff Belonger
Social Media - Infinity Home Mortgage Company, Inc - Cherry Hill, NJ
The FHA Expert - FHA Loans - FHA mortgages - USDA loans - VA Loans

Aaron.... it's not really having our own set of underwriting guidelines. We follow the general FHA guidelines set by HUD. And we can just take certain risks or make decisions that we feel comfortable with. The investors will typically make sure that it's all together neatly and inline. Sure, they could still say that they don't want it. And yes, we sell many of them in bulk also.

In regards to Shawna's comments.....   I have never been anywhere, as a banker or broker, even since I started back in 1992, that it took 45 to 60 days. Not trying to be rude here, but they just didn't have their stuff together then. Even when I first got started, it took an average of 30 days... 

Everyone is going to have their opinions on this. And it does depend on what company you work for.  And in regards to fees.... most companies have the same platform. So many of you don't realize that we all get the money from the same place, when all said and done. It comes down to the company's profit margin. Plain and simple.

Just my .02.....

jeff belonger

Oct 14, 2007 09:24 AM
Aaron Gordon
Branch Manager - Las Vegas, NV
Home Loan Consultant - Las Vegas, NV

Jeff--- Got it!!

Shawna--- I think you took my post a little wrong.  I do not think the broker experience is a bad choice.  Its just a different one. 

In my experience, and I could be wrong nationally, most of the real estate agents I know and speak with look for a banker relationship first and foremost for control of the loan.  So let me explain what I mean by control. 

In my entire career, I have always had the underwriter in my office with me.   I have brokered less than 10 loans in my career because, quite frankly, those loans did not allow me to provide the levels of service my clients expect.  

Many broker account reps, in my experience, on challenging loans, say whatever you want to hear.  This creates a problem when you need to communicate to the borrower and his agent.  When you rely on third-parties, you now rely on them for communication as well.  You are no longer in control.

Because I work so closely with my underwriter on hundreds of loans yearly, we are able to communicate the strengths and weaknesses of all loans, even those most challenging.    There is a level of trust and communication there that you do not get when you broker a loan out to an underwriter you dont have the same kind of relationship with.

So as a result, if I meet with a client initially and they face a challenge, that day I can walk into my underwriter's office, go over the file with her, and if she doesn't something, we can communicate these challenges to all parties immediately. 

Additionally, in my experience, an underwriter at a broker bank, who doesn't know the quality of loan officer you are, has to err on the side of caution, especially today.    If they know the quality of LO you are and they know there is nothing fishy in the file, you are better off. 

Regarding turnaround times, your experience at the bank is one I am not familiar with.    When I was a correspondent, my avg turnaround time was 18 days.    At my retail bank, and I have only been here 30 days, a loan can be done in as little as three days or possibly less.   I just closed one in five days after it fell out of escrow elsewhere, with a broker, by the way.  I closed a cash-out refinance for $1.5M in nine days, including the rescission.

I appreciate your comments.  It makes my point.  There are many options for agents when it comes to having a referral team.  

Your point illustrates that its not only important to have partners in each of these channels but its also important to understand your partner's business and infrastructure. 

You don't want a retail banking partner whose bank takes 45 days to close loans, just like you dont want a loan broker who only deals with the same 2-3 banks on every loan.  Learn about your partner's business.  There are many banks out there like Shawna describes.

Let me touch on your subprime comment.  I did a lot of subprime loans.  I dont think its anything to be ashamed of.  I always tried to get them conventional or government financing first.  

In today's environment, as you point out, there are less choices for lower credit scores, but thats why, as an agent you need to help the client turn over every rock there is to see if there is a financing deal there for him that he can live with.  If you only have one referral source in one lending channel, you may be leaving a lot of rocks unturned.

Finally, let me address your rate comment.  I have done hundreds loans in my life and I can't remember the last time I lost one on rate.  

At the end of the day, rates don't vary bank to bank that much today because of the more limited product choices.  Loan officers and the commission they want to make on a loan varies substantially and that's where you see the biggest differences.

 

 

Oct 14, 2007 12:08 PM
Ken Stampe
iBrandPlan.com - Grow your e-Profile & Brand - Dallas, TX
iBrandPlan
Aaron....brilliant post.
Oct 15, 2007 06:14 AM
Aaron Gordon
Branch Manager - Las Vegas, NV
Home Loan Consultant - Las Vegas, NV
Thanks, Ken!
Oct 16, 2007 12:57 PM
Bill Nazur
First Lending Solutions - Riverside, CA

Aaron

Congratulations on the move!! Will you be keeping the company name a secret? You can send me an email separately.

I too have been on both sides, and I totally agree with your move and your thought process.

Oct 16, 2007 01:20 PM
Aaron Gordon
Branch Manager - Las Vegas, NV
Home Loan Consultant - Las Vegas, NV
Thanks, Bill!!  I will email you privately.  
Oct 16, 2007 02:06 PM