Admin

Real estate brokers to blame for sub-prime mess?

By
Real Estate Broker/Owner with Townhouse Real Estate, Inc.

A recent article on Co-Star's web site argues that the real estate brokerage community is partially to blame for the current sub-prime loan debacle. Realtors, the theory goes, pushed unqualified buyers to buy homes they could not afford.  These brokers and agents, who knew, or should have known, that their prospects were unqualified, referred those prospects to mortgage brokers, with the understanding that the mortgage brokers would sell the unwitting prospects on loans they could not afford.

I don't buy it. At least not entirely. Sure, there are unethical real estate brokers out there, just like there are unethical doctors and pilots. If real estate brokers are guilty of anything wrong, I submit that their (our) crime is putting stars in sellers' eyes. I have known lots of brokers who were great at convincing sellers that their homes were worth excessive amounts.

Some say that's just part of the broker's obligation to represent the seller's interest. I say that it's not always in a seller's interest to get the last dollar out of the buyer. Of course we try to maximize the seller's gain, but we also have to balance the asking price against factors such as market reality, time on market, and probability of closing. Sometimes a seller is better served by presenting a lower offer from a buyer who is more likely to close, and who can do so more quickly and with fewer problems.

In any event, whatever happened to caveat emptor? Are we so deeply in a welfare/nanny-state, glory-to-the-victim mentality that we are willing to completely relieve buyers of all responsibility for their own decisions? The one thing I have not yet heard from any talking head is that maybe- just maybe - sometimes it is a buyer's own wishful thinking that gets him or her into financial trouble.

If you earn $40,000 a year, you ought to think twice about buying four multiple dwellings, needing work, in a burned-out neighborhood, with variable-rate loans, and without a lawyer. I am not making this up.

I'm not saying that all buyers who get in trouble should have known better and tough on them. Every day I see several who genuinely  were victims of mortgage fraud, or fraud by their sellers. I have seen, and continue to see, situations that reek of conspiracy among sellers, builders, appraisers and others. A big part of my practice right now is to actively work with the victims of mortgage and real estate scams to help them out of their situations.

In short, are real estate brokers partially to blame for the sub-prime troubles? Certainly, in part. Their part is pretty small, however, compared to all the other players.

Show All Comments Sort:
Anonymous
Brad
I think it would be very vaive not to realize that the brokers and agents have not played a part in the issues surrounding the industry.  What's the common phrase you here from agents and brokers, "I got into this business to make money."?  And if you haven't noticed, that permeates through in a lot of blog posts here too.  In my opinion, your side of the industry needs to squash that phrase and start teaching people what they are in the business to do . . . help people sell and buy real estate.  In my opinion, the brokers who embrace that will last and the others will "go away".
Oct 24, 2007 03:05 AM
#1
Johnny Park
AmREDS - Bakersfield, CA

I'm know  that there is plenty of blame to go around for everyone. Sure there were probably some unethical, money driven agents as surely as the buyers who wanted that property so badly that they were willing to stretch and stretch to buy the property. The mortgage brokers are to blame to. I used to share an office with one and because of the small size of the office, I could not but help over hear some of his phone conversations.

Some went something like this:

Mortgage broker (MB): I need a loan for a couple. The wife has a good FICO score 700s but has too little income. The husband makes good money but has a horrible score 500s. How can I make that work. Do I have to go stated? Can't I just add his income without him on the application? How can I make that work? How can we exclude the husband but keep his income? I need to get the loan to work. ETC.

Now I don't know the exact circumstances and I might be inferring too much into it. He might have just been doing his job to get the loan for that couple, but it seemed like to me that he was trying some unconventional ways to get around the loan application. There's a reason why lenders use a FICO score and income to determine if they will give out a loan and at what rate. You shouldn't cheat that process by adding income from a spouse but not putting that spouse on the application because of a bad FICO score.

All in all there's alot of people to blame for the mess. There's people who are trying to blame Alan Greenspan even.

Oct 24, 2007 03:13 AM