Seattle Real Estate - Commission Rebates for Buyer Clients

By
Real Estate Agent with Better Properties Seattle

Over on the Redfin Forum there is an ongoing discussion called "Rebate MESS!" that has become a huge frustration to the homebuyer. It has become increasingly "the norm" for All Commissions to be Negotiable between a Real Estate Agent and their client. Still...many agents seem to believe that only applies when "the Client" is a seller of a home and not when "the Client" is a buyer of a home.

To me, that suggests that the agents involved do not consider the Buyer and Seller as equal, and with equal rights to negotiate their commission with their agent.

I don't really care about the money of it. In fact, "negotiation" does not mean that the agent gets more or less money. It means that there is a meaningful and BINDING discussion between a Principal and their Client. Of course it is the Agent for the Buyer's job to know that they can perform as to the agreement they have with their Buyer Client, and there are limitations that will impact their ability to deliver what was promised. Consequently the old "don't OVER-Promise" applies and agents have to become more familiar with the laws and rules that govern their abiltiy to deliver what they have promised...before they promise it.

I am writing this post to urge agents to keep an open mind with regard to facilitating, within legal limits, the agreements between a buyer and his/her agent. In the linked case, the Agent for the Seller (and seller) are apparently refusing to reduce the price to allow for the credit, even though the net return to the Seller would not be impacted.

Being stubborn based on the principle? I don't know. But I do know this:

Real Estate Commission - Seattle

It's almost 2012.

If you ave been one of those agents who thinks that the buyer of a home has NO SAY in what their agent is paid.

If you are one of those agents who thinks the services a buyer receives from THEIR agent is "FREE".

I urge you to reconsider your stance...because...it's 2012 (almost) for Pete's Sake!

Start with YES...and only move to no if there is no possible way to facilitate that yes. But...know in advance...that there is a way.

Maybe it's time for NAR to add the HOW of that to the "Accredited Buyer Representative" Designation Course? I think so!

If you truly believe that the Buyer is your CLIENT...then you need to learn HOW to negotiate and enact commission charges with YOUR client.

It's as simple as that. Let it be so.

close

This entry hasn't been re-blogged:

Re-Blogged By Re-Blogged At
Topic:
ActiveRain Community
Groups:
RealtorsĀ®
Web 2.0
Tags:
real estate commissions seattle

Post a Comment
Spam prevention
Spam prevention
Show All Comments
Rainer
134,765
Stacia Whatley
Hawkins-Poe Inc. - Gig Harbor, WA
StaciaSellsHomes Your Western WA RealtorĀ®

Great post! I have been thinking this forever. I never understand the agents stance that they could never have their buyer sign an agency agreement. Even if money isn't involved! To me that just seems obsurd.

Jan 06, 2012 02:59 PM #1
Rainer
154,420
James A. Browning
Browning Real Estate School/REO Institute - International, IT
MRE REOCertified(R) SSCertified

Thank you for sharing your blog; we need Real estate Professionals to share their comments and information regarding their markets and experiences. Thanks again from beautiful

Jun 18, 2012 07:35 AM #2
Post a Comment
Spam prevention
Show All Comments

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?

Rainmaker
304,760

ARDELL DellaLoggia

Ask me a question
*
*
*
*
Spam prevention

Additional Information