Candidates focusing on the wrong house

By
Education & Training with REAZO

White House, Republican presidential candidates, debates, housing industry 

The only house candidates appear to be concerned with

Working in the real estate industry and being a political junkie, I have been watching the recent debates and primaries with much interest. During the most recent debates in Florida I thought where better for the candidates to discuss their plans for jumpstarting the ailing real estate industry? For the most part, Republican candidates have remained quiet on the issue. 

Now, with the Florida debate and election over, the quiet remains. In the most recent debate, the candidates got their chance to address the issue when a member of the audience asked about how they would use Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to help the housing industry. Unfortunately, the chance was wasted when Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney took advantage of the question to attack each other for making money from the mortgage giants either through consulting or investing.

After a back and forth between the two candidates, Rick Santorum pretty much summed up my feelings by suggesting the two should set aside their "petty personal politics" and that the candidates should focus on the larger issue. But even after his comment, Santorum had no concrete suggestions of his own on what should be done.

It strikes me as curious that while there is much talk about the economy there is so little talk about the housing market. It will be difficult, at least, to see significant improvement in the former until there is improvement in the latter. 

For me it was a Washington Post opinion piece that made sense out of the silence. Apparently all four of the candidates are on the record (at least vaguely) for wanting to see government take a smaller role in the housing industry. That is consistent with the Republican philosophy of less, not more, government. The problem for all four is that many industry experts say that is exactly the attitude that got us in this mess in the first place. A common sentiment among pundits is that it will take large, bold efforts to make a signifficant differnece.

That leaves the candidates with little to say. And that's unfortunate for them. President Obama seems vunerable, at least, on this issue. It's pretty clear his efforts over the past three years have fallen short. We'll see what will come of his new efforts to reduce interest rates for many homeowners.

But I'm a betting guy and I bet none of the candidates, neither Republican nor Democrat, will give this issue the public attention it deserves. Fixing the ongoing problems in the housing market is, as my father used to say, "A tough nut to crack." I'm thinkin' none of them want to take on this challenge right before an election.

(Despite the ailing market, some real estate professionals are doing just fine. Check out my interview with Mike Phillips, arguably the most successful broker in the United States. See the blog here at http://actvra.in/rYM.)

Grant Sasek works for Real Estate Pipeline, an Internet-based lead generation service.

Posted by

    

 If you enjoyed reading this,

 

 

                                                                                                                           

Comments (3)

Mike Carlier
Lakeville, MN
More opinions than you want to hear about.

I'm afraid that the only hope for constructive progress in housing is for President Obama to continue to lose his war on business.  With the economy seeming to be on its way back up the cycle, there will be more jobs and fewer people worrying about losing their jobs.  That should affect the number of distressed homes and ultimately the housing market.

Up to now, government emphasis has been on delaying the return to rental by folks who can't afford their homes.  There have been seemingly conflicting actions to assist the quicker return to rental by those willing to undergo a short sale.  Now the Obama solution is leaning toward helping people who can afford their current but above market rate interest loans.  How will this improve housing?  Simple answer is that it will do nothing positive. 

Decreased home values have put many home owners in the state of total immobility unless they want to walk away from their homes.  They may be able to make significantly higher payments and have enough saved for a decent down payment.  They just can't afford to  bring a truckful of money to the closing table.  Portable debt for financially able home owner/buyers would be a huge step toward revitalizing the housing market. 

Feb 01, 2012 01:39 AM
Angela Lyons
REAZO - Missoula, MT
Reazo.com for home buyers and sellers.

Mike,

Unfortunately I agree with all you have to say. It could be a long road back to a healthy market.

Feb 01, 2012 01:47 AM
Lynn B. Friedman CRS Atlanta GA 404-939-2727
Atlanta Homes ODAT Realty - Buckhead - Midtown - Westside ... Love our City - Love our Clients! - Atlanta, GA
Concierge Service for Our Atlanta Sellers & Buyers

Dear Grant -

Mike's idea of "Portable debt for financially able home owner/buyers would be a huge step toward revitalizing the housing market." sounds like a great idea to share with Gingrich - Check out GIngrich's 15% flat tax for people and the 12.5 flat tax for business proposal - or - in his plan - one could continue to pay the now existing method. Empower the citizen to decide which way to pay ...

Have a happy day -
Lynn

Feb 02, 2012 08:08 PM

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?