Why Are You Questioning My Client’s Lender?
I have seen a trend with some REO listing agents to require a specific lender pre-qualify a prospective buyer as a pre-requisite to submitting and offer on their listing. This goes beyond a requirement that the pre-qualification be with anyone at a bank, but pointed at a single loan officer.
I can understand a bank wanting to ensure that they do not waste time with an offer before making a commitment to accept the contract, but when it is pointed at an individual lender that is not connected with the bank that holds title to the property is this not steering?
There is usually a disclaimer that the buyer can still chose to get their mortgage with the lender of their choice, and maybe even a waiver of some fees if the buyer uses that lender, but I feel that when the agent pushes to a single source are they going beyond due diligence? It may be understandable that an agent would have preferred lenders that they feel confident will get their clients approved for their best opportunity to buy, and will not over state value. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that they can attempt to promote all their business through a single source.
I have seen this in the past, and have always had the loan officer of choice for my lender call the ‘chosen one’ to discuss my buyer’s financials and then get an acknowledgment that their criteria has been met. It may not satisfy either the agent’s or the loan officer’s desires but I don’t think they had the best of motives to start.
No one wants to start a transaction with a buyer that may not be able to close a contract. For that reason we take the time to call the loan officer that submitted the pre-qualification letter and chat as best we can the buyer’s capabilities so that we can best inform our selling clients of that person’s abilities to purchase. Just don’t try to get overly involved with my client.
Comments(18)