I must agree. I work with several investors and they ALWAYS have first dibs at a property I show them. I did actually buy one 2 years ago that I showed to 2 investors, but both passed on it and told me to have at it. (I think they were far smarter than me, btw.)
Hi Jon,
Different perspective on the BBA. We learned this week in a legal update that basically it committs the buyer to paying us commission even if they buy from another agent, ie the listing agent, in the event we aren't paid by them.
Great post!
If you believe in using BBA (or are made to) there are all sorts of great reasons to do it but this example is a new one on me. I've never heard it before but I suppose it could happen. I agree with you though that it makes the agent look bad and look like we're out to screw our customers. How much worse can we look?
what a great point as another method of educating buyers on why this is important to them!
Mark - what point your are talking about? I am saying that this is horse$hit, you are saying that this is important to them, adn at the same time sounds like you agree with me...
I am confused
Gloria - I think buyers start with simply trying to look at the properties, and for me it is the time that allows me to demonstrate that I bring value to the table, which they did not see before. It is an opportunity to show them how much more I know which they don't and how this knowledge is important for their successful purchase
Than - I do the same, and I am sure any decent agent would do the same. I am sure that Mike would do the same, and is using it to affect the buyers.
DeeDee - true. the whole point is that BBA has a lot for the agent, but not much if anything for the customer. But this is not how it is presented in the post
Jill - it just plan bad. I can't imagine coming to a buyer and telling him that he better sign the agreement with me, or I can compete with him
Ouch
Comments(10)