Special offer

By Lender's Standard, Is A Buyer Really Prequalified Even if.....

By
Real Estate Agent with eXp Realty

By Lender's Standard, Is A Buyer Really Prequalified Even if.....

I'm not a lender and I don't play one on TV so I'd like to summon your take on this and respond to the queries at hand (agent and loan officers alike).

We all understand that mortgage financing is conditional upon certain things happening.  Among those these, we Seal of Approvaltypically view the following as acceptable conditions:

  • Verification of employment
  • Verification of income
  • Rental/mortgage history (if applicable)
  • Ability to obtain homeowner's insurance (if applicable)
  • Condition of property meets lenders and FHA standards (if applicable)
  • Sales price supported by appraisal

But what about if the buyer has some credit issues that need to be cleared up before a loan can fund?  And assuming that buyer can clear those credit issues prior to closing, then in the opinion of the lender, do you consider to buyer to be pre-qualified? 

In my little feeble mind, the answer is a resounding NO.  How many of you would issue a pre-approval letter even if funding was conditional upon the buyer clearing up a credit report issue prior to closing?

How many buyer's agency would knowingly bring a buyer's offer knowing of this contingency?

How many listing agents would advise their seller of this condition and advise to accept or not accept?

Just curious.

Kathryn Maguire
GreatNorfolkHomes.com (757) 560-0881 - Chesapeake, VA
Serving Chesapeake, Norfolk, VA Beach

Goodness!  I would hope that this would not be a situation where someone is considered pre-qualified.  That just would shoot any remaining credibility we have in pre-qual letters!  Parking to see lender reponses....

Jun 07, 2012 10:49 PM
Sussie Sutton
David Tracy Real Estate - Houston, TX
David Tracy Real Estate for Buyers & Sellers

WOW! I am waiting to see what the comments reveal. I too am worried about the effect on pre qual letters the answers have. My pea brain agrees with yours on your opinion.

Jun 07, 2012 10:59 PM
Charita Cadenhead
eXp Realty - Birmingham, AL
Serving Jefferson and Shelby Counties (Alabama)

Kathryn and Sussie I am hoping lenders honest weigh in on this (even those that could consider this a bonafide pre-qualified applicant).  Even if they do view this as being pre-qualified, hopefully they'll answer why they deem it as such.

Jun 07, 2012 11:01 PM
Mike Cooper, Broker VA,WV
Cornerstone Business Group Inc - Winchester, VA
Your Neighborhood Real Estate Sales Pro

I would agree with you, Charita, but in our wacky world of numbers manipulation anything can happen.  We just had an unusual one that had some of that shifting stuff around at the last minute.  It saved the say, but it was a close one.

Jun 07, 2012 11:06 PM
Dick Greenberg
New Paradigm Partners LLC - Fort Collins, CO
Northern Colorado Residential Real Estate

Hi Charita - By now, I pretty much know which of my local lenders will give the wrong answers to your questions, and any buyers unlucky enough to be using them are treated with some suspicion. Maybe a bit unfair, but necessary.

Jun 08, 2012 12:40 AM
Christine Smith
Buyers Brokers Only LLC - www.BuyersBrokersOnly.com - Canton, MA
Exclusive Buyer Agent & Attorney, Canton, MA

Charita...that is why I prefer my buyers to use my preferred lenders who I know will not preaprove someone until these issues are cleared.  In fact, I have buyers working out such an issue right now BEFORE their lender will issue their preapproval.  Of course I cannot force anyone to use a specific lender so I could have some buyers who have just such a shaky preapproval and I would not know it.  But if I knew about it, I would not be showing them houses or submitting an offer.

Jun 08, 2012 07:26 AM
Brenda Mullen
RE/MAX Associates - San Antonio, TX
Your San Antonio TX Real Estate Agent!!

Umm, that would be a NO for me....course, I am just an agent.  How sure are we that credit issues would be cleared up?  That is random..clear it up first, then pre-qualify/pre-approve, then come talk to me lol :)!

Jun 10, 2012 01:04 AM
Gene Mundt, IL/WI Mortgage Originator - FHA/VA/Conv/Jumbo/Portfolio/Refi
NMLS #216987, IL Lic. 031.0006220, WI Licensed. APMC NMLS #175656 - New Lenox, IL
708.921.6331 - 40+ yrs experience

Charita:  The answer is yes ... and no.  Depending on the issue needing be resolved, I would issue a pre-qual letter ... with a contingency attached that the issue must be resolved to the satisfaction of underwriting.   The validity or strength of that pre-qualification rests solely on the strengths and abilities of the mortgage lender it is issued by and ... just how well that lender can orchestrate or navigate/direct the removal of the contingency involved.  Having a track record with the mortgage lender issuing the pre-qual ... or a knowledge of their success rate ...  will likely make an agent either satisfied that the transaction will proceed successfully ... or terribly nervous.  Obviously a pure pre-qual is desired, but depending on the property and number of offers received, a contingency pre-qual might be better than nothing.

Lots more could be written about the pros and cons of securing this type of pre-qualification, but that is my short answer in a nutshell ...

Gene

Jun 10, 2012 07:36 AM
Charita Cadenhead
eXp Realty - Birmingham, AL
Serving Jefferson and Shelby Counties (Alabama)

Without question Mike, it can happen.  It just a bit to close for comfort for me.

Dick I'm with you.  I would attach that same vail of suspicion (right or wrong).

Christine if we can get them to understand why we refer to a particular lender and then they accept that rationale, then half the battle is over.  We know the buyer is in the hands of a good lender and we know that particular loan officer is as good a gold.

That's my train of thought Brenda......clear up the issue first then come back when you are really ready.

Thanks for weighing in Gene.  You know I appreciate your input.  I 100% agree that the lender makes all the difference in the world particularly one in which we have a relationship with.  I think that pre-qual letter would scare me a little Gene and I'd be hesitant to encourage my seller to accept it, particularly if I were not familiar with the lender or the mortgage broker. For me Gene, knowing the tract record of the lender might make all the difference in the world, but buyers often come to the table with lenders that we have no experience or knowledge of.  To be clear, I am using lender and mortgage broker interchangeably for the purpose of this post/comment.  In some cases it's a tough call.  In others, it's a no brainer.

 

Jun 10, 2012 10:34 PM
Gene Mundt, IL/WI Mortgage Originator - FHA/VA/Conv/Jumbo/Portfolio/Refi
NMLS #216987, IL Lic. 031.0006220, WI Licensed. APMC NMLS #175656 - New Lenox, IL
708.921.6331 - 40+ yrs experience

Exactly my point, Charita ... you express it beautifully.  As the scenario changes ... what lender ... buyer's circumstances ... seller's needs ... it can make a huge difference as to how you react in this case.  And I agree, your sellers would need to know the truth and the value of the offer prior to accepting it.  More proof that WHO you work with is vital to the success of the transaction ... and how smoothly it goes.  I do want to add that ... along with the contingency added to this pre-qual ... I am honest with my agent as to what it will take to get the contingency cleared and how likely that is to happen.  They then must move forward as they judge fit ...

It truly is teamwork that gets a transaction successfully closed these days, isn't it??

Gene

Jun 11, 2012 02:35 AM