Home > Blogs > Dan Gobis > Dan Gobis's (dgobis) Blog

Is there a Republican candidate capable of winning in November?

By Dan Gobis

Real Estate Agent with Re/Max Newport Realty Corp.

January 20, 2008 09:47 AM

I am an independent voter.

According to a September 3, 2006 Washington Post article, A Nation of Free Agents, by Marc Ambinder:

"Independent voters comprise about 10 percent of the electorate, but the percentage of persuadable independents has shot up to about 30 percent. In the 27 states that register voters by party, self-declared independents grew from 8 percent of the registered electorate in 1987 to 24 percent in 2004, according to political analyst Rhodes Cook. Consistently, about 30 percent of U.S. voters tell pollsters they don't belong to a party."

I don't think any of the Republican candidates are capable of beating either Obama or Clinton. Paul makes the most sense of the Republican candidates, but he isn't "presidential" looking and truly doesn't stand a chance of winning the nomination much less the election in November.

Romney won't win, the majority is not sure of electing a Mormon, or a Baptist Minister, McCain, who won South Carolina, could be nominated, can't win in November, Thompson, he's no Ronald Reagan, Giuliani, too many wives.

The Democrats eventual nominee has a distinct advantage thanks to the Bush Administration. The vote in November will be more of a vote against the Republican Administration "led" by Bush, than a victory by the Democrats.

When is the last time the Vice-President of a two term President was not even remotely considered as a Presidential candidate?

Clinton, Obama, or Edwards? Reminiscent of Bush vs. Gore, Clinton won more votes in the Nevada Caucus, but it appears Obama receives more Delegates. Experience? Does that mean toe the party line? If so, not necessarily an attribute. Edwards? I doubt it.

Packer game just started. Gotta set priorities.

Comments(10)

Comment

Show All Comments Sort:

Endea Thibodeaux

Lanham, MD

Solar Energy Consultant, CDPE, CLHMS

It's a bit dismal. I think though the Democrats will get in. Not much they can do though!

Jan 20, 2008 10:12 AM

John Chase

Ask about land and ranches for sale in WY- Chase Brothers - Sheridan, WY

Land and Ranches in Sheridan, WY

Yes, there are a couple. Romney has what it takes to lead a nation. Huckabee pulled Arkansas back to its feet after the Clintons left it in the trash. This doesn't mean our country will be smart enough to vote for someone who can do the right thing. I guess were at a crossroads. Do we head into socialism, or continue to keep the Republic alive.

Bush has screwed up and lost my backing, but it's not for the reasons everyone else thinks. I think he screwed up by trying to outspend the Democrats.

Jan 20, 2008 10:18 AM

Dan Gobis

Re/Max Newport Realty Corp. - Racine, WI

Endea, I sense we'll see an exciting run to November, once the nominees are decided. Hopefully, for our countrys sake, the the debates will be positive, challenging, and spirited. A tough combination, but it would be stimulating, and the country needs stimulation.

After two years of economic challenge we are ready to move forward.

Jan 20, 2008 10:23 AM

John, I agree. It's tunnel vision that has voters stereotyping candidates, and making poor decisions at the polls.

Jan 20, 2008 10:30 AM

Jon Zolsky, Daytona Beach, FL

Daytona Condo Realty, 386-405-4408 - Daytona Beach, FL

Buy Daytona condos for heavenly good prices

That's not entirely fair. Cheney said from the get go that he will not be considering becoming a President, so the question should be "When is the last time the Vice-President of a two term President was not even remotely interested in becoming a President?"

As for America tired of Bush, it is a very personal statement. I was way more tired of frolicking Clinton. But it is a matter of taste.

You are confident about Hillary, that she can beat McCain, and I am far from it. Why would the nation trust a lady, who was one day saying that there was a right wing conspiracy against her faithful husband, and then a few days later, when he finally figured that fellatio had something to do with sex, which he did not know before - gee, what an accomplishment!- and she ate eat without slapping him. This is a political marriage, so why is McCain, a person with real integrity, has no chance against the Clintons?

So, when America gets tired of those republicans, and picks a democrat, it is only a matter of time, until the country gets tired of those wonderful guys screwing everything. That's pretty much why we have them succeeding each other.

Jan 20, 2008 10:38 AM

Jon, If Cheney was not even remotely interested in becoming President, he should not have accepted the nomination for Vice-President. You don't think if the Bush Administration had more success, Cheney would not have a different position on the Presidency? Have you ever heard of a politician changing their mind or position?

I am not confident that Hillary can beat McCain. I am confident that the Bush Administration and their inability to lead will cause the Republican candidate to lose.

I never said the Democrats were wonderful guys. I am not sure who I am voting for, a Republican or a Democrat, but I will exercise my right to vote.

Jan 20, 2008 11:03 AM

Chuck Willman

Chuck Willman - Alpine, UT

NewHouseUtah.com

I think McCain has a chance against Hillary. I don't think we'll have a good grasp on these candidates for a couple weeks. They all seem to be fine-tuning their messages still.

Jan 20, 2008 11:22 AM

I'm with you on that Chuck.

Jan 20, 2008 12:18 PM

Dan,

Give me one good reason for someone to come subject to him not ever trying to become a president, and said it from day one, and never ever gave a hint on changing his mind.

The way he acted he proves that he did not lie. If you want to be there, you will put your face out, and Cheney did not. Al Gore did, in every capacity.

I, however, think that Americans have taken it upon themselves not to love any administration at the end of its rule. I think we have a very short attention span, and want everything quick. We are the immediate gratification people, and economy has tough time pleasing in a moment, wars are not won in a week, and I am afraid Americans do not give anyone a chance to build anything. Quickly you only can build the homes from cards, but they are paper. Building as a process takes time. We do not want to give it to them. WOuldn't you agree?

Jan 21, 2008 02:35 PM

Jon, Maybe it's me, but I am not sure what you are saying in the first two sentences.

I didn't care for the Bush Administration from day one, and have gained no respect for it now that we are near the end of it. I think the popularity polls show most Americans feel this way.

Immediate gratification? Eight years is not exactly immediate gratification.

I'm not 100%, but I think I agree to disagree.

Jan 22, 2008 12:10 PM

Is there a Republican candidate capable of winning in November?

Comments(10)

Dan Gobis

Real Estate Resources

Recent Posts