City of Minneapolis and Backflow Preventer Companies are in Cahoots.

By
Real Estate Agent with Edina Realty

Selling a home in Minneapolis?  You're required to have a city-approved inspector conduct a Truth in Housing inspection, and they will charge you at least $175 to do it.  They claim it is to "improve the housing stock" in Minneapolis. I say it's a bunch of Hooey. If Minneapolis wanted to improve the housing stock, they would perform actual inspections of homes prior to establishing an "estimated market value" which is how our property taxes are assessed. These inspections would be on a regular basis of each and every home in the city, not just on those that are being put on the market. 

As it stands today, one of the most common required repairs is for the home owner to place a backflow  preventer and all outside spickets and the laundry tub.  Now, if the city of Minneapolis were really trying to improve the housing stock, why would they let homes that are 80-100 years old sit without these backflow preventers until the time the homeowner wanted to move?

Nope, I'm convinced that these backflow preventer manufacturers are in cahoots with my city officials. The US Census estimates about there are about 171,000 housing units in Minneapolis.  If, on average, these homes have two outside spickets and one laundry tub that require backflow preventers, that's 513,000 backflow preventers. They average between $5-$10 per piece, so let's compromise and say at $7 per piece, that's $3,591,000 for the backflow preventer manufacturer.  The city of Minneapolis 7% sales tax would net the city over $251,370 (and I'm not even including the $21,375,000 the city would get at $175 per inspection).

Think of what we could do for the Minnesota economy if we made other requirements for home owners prior to the sale of a home.  We could require Minnesotans to buy a Ford truck (could we save the Ford Plant in St.Paul?) or buy a Northwest airline ticket, or bring your car to a Northwest Mechanic for an oil change.  These changes would be more effective ways to protect both consumers and our economy than the current Truth-in housing evaluation.

Comments (4)

Bonnie Erickson
Tangletown Realty - Saint Paul, MN
Lisa, the truth in housing inspector is paid the inspection fee, not the City.  I used to find it fascinating that owner occupied homes would not be flagged by the city inspectors for long grass or junk in the yards but every landlord in town was under the gun if the grass/weeds exceeded 6" or if a workman left the old toilet by the garage for later pick-up!  Thankfully, St. Paul does not yet have any required repairs except to have one hardwired smoke detector (and a carbon monoxide one in 2009!).  You think Mpls. is tough.  You should see some of the suburban inspections!
Jan 13, 2007 05:31 PM
Lisa Dunn
Edina Realty - Minneapolis, MN
www.TwinCitySeller.com
Bonnie, Minnneapolis isn't tough....which is part of the problem.  I do not think this inspection process results in an "increase in the housing stock". When the focus is on "spicket ismissing backflow preventer" and "stairway to lower level has inadequate headroom".   Do you know the St. Paul Fire Marshall wants St. Paul to have a similar inspection? It will be interesting to see what transpires!
Jan 13, 2007 09:13 PM
Bonnie Erickson
Tangletown Realty - Saint Paul, MN
Lisa, Yes, I'm in agreement with you about the increase in quality of housing that does NOT result from the truth in housing inspections.  When I discussed this with the inspections department their response was that they are looking out for public safety issues as well, i.e., the backflow preventers.  IF (and that's a big IF) the city water system were to be depressureized (made up word there) enough to suck water back in from my little house, it would indeed be an amazing feat.  Imagine all the toilet water that would be doing the same thing!  Yuck!  I agree that the Minneapolis truth in housing is not tough enough.  I explained this to my husband once saying the city inspections don't worry me at all unless there's something really wrong with the roof or paint.  The TIH inspection is done in about 20 minutes using that 4 page letter size checklist.  There are certain hot buttons that are especially emphasized and beyond that most anything can fly.  It's a lot like the Section 8 inspections I used to have done on rentals.  Check, check, check.  Also, I am very aware of St. Paul's consideration of making required repairs from the Truth in Housing.  It's an equally superficial inspection, but we're just waiting for the announcement that the inspection will now require repairs like Minneapolis does.  Both of the Twin Cities TIH inspections are nothing compared to the buyer's inspection done as part of the purchase process.
Jan 14, 2007 06:09 AM
Lisa Dunn
Edina Realty - Minneapolis, MN
www.TwinCitySeller.com
Amen. Buyer's, even though you see seller disclosures and truth in housing evaluation disclosures, get an inspection. Don't buy a house without one.
Jan 14, 2007 11:27 PM

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?