Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Heck, Mona... you can even give me a full one-minute commercial. That would be fine.
Yes, Rachel Maddow IS special. And she is incredibly bright. And, as you said, guests who come on her show do NOT have to worry about "gotcha" moments, so she gets more guests who are either conservatives or Republicans than many of the other shows... and simply "discussed" subjects. What a concept.
Tonight I watched her show, and as usual, she was brilliant. And... gulp... even Ed Schultz is growing on me. He "hangs" with lots of middle America folks, and is very much a battle it out in the trenches kind of guy. And... since Rachel always follows the Ed Show... I very much enjoy the back and forth between Ed and Rachel as he ends his show, and turns over the airwaves to Rachel.
I am so thrilled with the outcome of Tuesday's election. And, the fact that President Obama won EIGHT of the NINE "battleground" states just thrills me even more. He won every one of them except for some nameless state just north of South Carolina, and just south of Virginia. To quote the great Red State Texan Rick Perry... Ooops.
Yayyyy Rachel!
PS... try taping Morning Joe... from 6am to 9am Eastern Time... and get to know Mika Brzezinski. I just KNOW you will like her as well.
Great blog Mona, I am glad that you are happy with the results, I worry about the great divide in our country right now, hopefully we can all get past these differences and start working toward the best solutions for everyone.
Also thanks for the Rachel Maddow recommendation, I will watch her.
Good Morning Karen Anne, when possible I do watch Joe Scarborough and Mika. Personally? I like a fair and balanced view of current affairs. Interestingly enough, very often I like to listen to former RNC's chair Michael Steele and republican strategist Steve Schmidt...as long as they are on someone's show who will actually let them get their viewpoint out. In fact, I'd rather witness their participation sometimes than I would someone like Chris Matthews who is in so much of a hurry to make sure you hear what he has to say than what his guests have to say.
Hello to you Bob, I also have a tremendous concern for the polarization in this country and sometimes I blame the extreme bias approach to so called news. I wonder if there aren't a couple of gods on some virtual Mt Olympus someplace maniputlating the strings and casting side bets for amusement. The fires must be getting stoked for some reason. I hope you'll enjoy Rachel Maddow and thank you for having an open mind to tune in. Have a wonderful day.
Good morning Mona. I appreciate and agree with your viewpoint and missed Wednesday's show with Rachel so it was terrific experiencing it here. It did happen and it was great. Reality is a good place to be in: it may be tough but always beats fantasy in my view.
It was a good night and restores some of my hope for a more enlightened world. I am puzzled about the apparent turn around since 2010 and question its stability. The passage by voters for marriage equality, legalization of MJ as a controlled substance, and the ousting of avowed women haters do appear to be an indication of a coming paradigm sift but only time will till if the tread continues. I hope it will.
Rachael may be the best that mainstream media has to offer up for broadcast news but that still does not set the bar too terribly high. Her broadcasts are as divisive as any of the others and, though, what she reports is mostly accurate, the voids in the reporting of vitally important information are enormous. If she reported real news and told the whole story she would not have a job at MSNBC or any other mainstream outlet.
Our mainstream media is not there to inform or enlighten, it is there to propagandize. Rachel's enthusiastic support in the clip you shared for the two party (duopoly) is a more than telling example. Our choice every election cycle, which she will never point out, is the duopoly or nothing. When it comes down to it our choices are a bit like the hens being given the choice for the fox or the weasel to be in charge of the hen house. Doesn't really matter much to anyone, except maybe to the fox or the weasel.
Mona, I am very happy with the Presidential results. That other guy just plain scared me!
I missed this episode of Rachel! Thank you for sharing...I have goosebumps!
Hi Sheila, I know your life in NJ has been a bit hectic with the new house, selling the old house, hurricanes, nor'easters and I'm not surprised you didn't get a chance to see this. Glad you liked it.
Allen, is that your indoor voice? lol. The duopoly system is probably less than ideal and I wonder if we will ever evolve to much more simply from a logistics standpoint. We'd have to become a much more civil society for the public to be able to digest all they needed to from a multitude of choices. I think of Rachel as someone with one foot in the mainstream and one foot in the magical mystery tour of everything else...in short, a rebel. I get what you are saying but I guess for now, those who have the curiosity to know everything...including what isn't told to us, will need to continue to avail ourselves of other avenues. There are still some out there who don't have to report back to a corporate head with justification of the bottom line. Your comments are always insightful, edgy and refreshingly welcome.
Belinda, everything and everyone connected with the other guy made us nervous.
Lanise, put a sweater on and just remain ever vigilant,,,those campaigns in four years will need workers and cheerleaders. Glad you enjoyed it.
Sorry about the large type -- didn't realize until posting what I had done.
Whether Allen yells or not, I dig Maddow. Smart gal. Idealistic, yes. Fair, I think. Intelligent, no doubt.
Hello Mona!

Comments(11)