What happens to your flood insurance premiums after you make a claim?

By
Managing Real Estate Broker with Brad MacKenzie

What happens to your flood insurance premiums after you make a claim?

You might think that flood insurance premiums are like auto insurance premiums and that a claim you make for flood damage would greatly increase your cost of insurance, starting with your next payment.

Not so! Flood insurance premiums, like every aspect of flood insurance, are completely mandated and controlled by FEMA, the Federal agency tasked with the problem of insuring homes in flood zones.

Carolyn Marion wave

FEMA decides what land is in or out of a flood zone. FEMA establishes the premium for each piece of property in flood zones, and FEMA doesn't necessarily, or even usually, re-rate properties based on the claims made. That may be because the flood zones are established based on the actuarial risk of having a 1% chance of flood during any given year.  That 1% chance is what people are talking about when they say "a hundred-year flood". It's really the risk that their will be a flood THIS year.

So if you are paying $1,000 a year for flood insurance and make a claim for $150,000, how much will your premium be next year?  $1,000.

That fact doesn't change the hot button issue right now, which is that premiums are rising to match the true actuarial risk of flood. Sometimes this means that people who have been paying a few hundred or a few thousand dollars a year are now staring at bills with five digits and wondering how they can afford to keep their house.

Here in Massachusetts, there are some waterfront homes worth seven figures where doubling or tripling the flood insurance premium isn't going to sink, or soak, the owner in unaffordable premiums. Not every waterfront home here has a value like that, though.

If a house on a Louisiana bayou worth $150,000 suddenly has an annual flood insurance premium of $20,000 . . . well, that home owner might just walk away from the house. Never mind that a flood might someday damage or obliterate the house -- the insurance premium could render the home valueless today. That's a national problem, not just a local problem for waterfront owners.

We NEED a federal insurance program. The private market won't create insurance suitable for this risk. It's not just about oceanfront property, either. Many people across the country live in low-lying areas that are subject to flooding. Think Mississippi River.

What FEMA and Congress are now trying to figure out is whether the actuarial data that's been produced for the latest FEMA flood maps is right: whether it captures the true risk of flood or not. Then there is a battle about how much the premiums should be to cover that risk. Then there's the argument about whether flood insurance should cover only the lenders' and banks' risk of losing money on their mortgages, or whether homeowners should be forced to pay for more coverage to include their equity, their contents, their home interiors and their second floors.  (Flood insurance only pays for damage to the first floor.)

How this program will work in the coming years, and what it will cost, are the subject of enormous debate right now. Stay tuned for more news and information. Same Bat-Channel, Same Bat-Blog.

P.S. Yeah, that's my friend Carolyn waiting on a "happy" wave, not a flood disaster wave. Good times.

Comments (5)

Coldwell Banker
Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage - Duxbury, MA
More homes sold faster for more money than anyone

This is good. You should write more about flood insurance. It's such a big issue right now.

Nov 21, 2013 10:41 PM
Michael Jacobs
Pasadena, CA
Los Angeles Pasadena 818.516.4393

Hi Brad -- I have to admit to not knowing much about flood insurance.  Your post offers a lot of good information.   As part of the inspection/investigation period of a home purchase in my market, I advise buyers to contact an insurance broker(or more than one) to school themselves as to the coverage available, the costs, deductibles, etc. A seller typically provides a third party report describing such conditions but an insurance company makes it "real" for the potential homeowner.  

Nov 22, 2013 12:03 AM
Brad MacKenzie
Brad MacKenzie - Duxbury, MA
Turning Houses into Homes on the South Shore

I will, CB.

I agree, Michael. You can't trust the seller's opinion, although a report by a third party should usually be reliable. I'm not sure how that works in California? Here, the buyer's bank is going to do the legwork. In a cash deal, the buyer needs to do due diligence on this matter for itself.

Dec 05, 2013 01:29 PM
Jill Watts
Realty Pro, Inc. - Vancouver, WA
A Luxury Experience at Every Price Point!

Here in Clark County, WA the seller has to provide a "elevation certificate" for their waterfront homes to sell. It's basically a survey to see how far up from the water/possible flooding that the home sits above it. It averages from $300 to $500. 

 

Dec 14, 2013 04:15 PM
Brad MacKenzie
Brad MacKenzie - Duxbury, MA
Turning Houses into Homes on the South Shore

Yes, indeed, Jill. Interesting that the elevation cert is required for all waterfront homes. Yours are less expensive than ours. Please see also http://activerain.com/blogsview/4258949/do-you-need-to-have-flood-insurance-should-you-have-flood-insurance-

Dec 14, 2013 09:34 PM

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?