New Regulations Hurting Small Mortgage Lenders?

By
Real Estate Attorney with federalfinanciallawgroup.com

I have a colleague that is also the President of a small lender. They have about 8 branches.  Members of his communities rely upon his bank because it is a local community bank and customers have pretty good access to him. He is involved in every loan transacation and he approves loans that pther lenders would not (and they rarely go into default). He advised me this week that new mortgage rules that took effect last week could further hamper small lenders’ ability to issue loans. This was widely reported in the Wall Street Journal.

Under the new rules, lenders must ensure that borrowers can pay back their loans. Loans that meet “qualified mortgage” (QM) standards will provide a safe harbor to lenders from future lawsuits, while loans issued outside of QM standards will carry more legal risk.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau defines “qualified mortgages” as loans that meet the ability-to-repay rule and in which borrowers spend no more than 43 percent of their income on debt. Furthermore, fees and other charges may make up no more than 3 percent of the loan.

Small lenders reportedly will tread cautiously in the new lending environment because they are worried about the legal risk of making loans that don’t meet new standards, according to The Wall Street Journal.
“We’re going to be very conservative just to make sure that we’re in compliance and don’t get into trouble,” says Mark Walker, chief executive of Michigan Mutual Inc., a lender with 300 employees based in Port Huron, Mich. “There are going to be loans that we did in 2013 that we are not going to be able to do in 2014.”

As reported, any lender who falls outside of the new rules may be unable to sell the loan to investors such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Large lenders—such as Wells Fargo and Bank of America—already have said they plan to continue issuing loans outside of CFPB’s Qualified Mortgage standards and will hold those loans on their own books.

Will smaller lenders even consider?  Non-bank lenders will be particularly cautious since they often don’t use their own investment portfolios to hold the loans on their books, The Wall Street Journal reports.

For example, Linda Sweet, president and CEO of Big Valley Federal Credit Union in Sacramento, Calif., says her credit union will mostly stop making mortgage loans in 2014. Her credit union made about 30 mortgage loans in 2013.

“The burden of trying to comply with the regulation is just overwhelmingly costly for a small financial institution,” Sweet says.

CFPB announced it is monitoring the new rule’s impact closely on loan availability to see if any tweaks need to be made.

“I think we got the rule right,” says Peter Carroll, CFPB’s assistant director for mortgage markets. But he adds that “we don’t want to see credit get unduly cut for people, where there are responsible loans being made.”


 http://www.realestatemoney.com/new-rules-for-lenders/#ixzz2r9WjXGKI

Paddy Deighan J.D. Ph.D

http://www.homesavers.pro

Comments (6)

Pamela Seley
West Coast Realty Division - Murrieta, CA
Residential Real Estate Agent serving SW RivCo CA

I also read somewhere that 2014 may be seeing people laid off from smaller mortgage lenders. That's sad. I wonder if this so there will be more government guaranteed FHA loans over conventional loans? Because it sounds like the QM rules haven't changed for VA and FHA. Just seems to me like a massive government takeover of the mortgage lending industry.

Jan 22, 2014 02:37 AM
Paddy Deighan MBA JD PhD
federalfinanciallawgroup.com - Vail, CO
Paddy Deighan J.D. Ph.D

Pam, what is also distressing is that the CFPB also added fees to all FHA loans to help fund ObamaCare

Jan 22, 2014 02:46 AM
Pamela Seley
West Coast Realty Division - Murrieta, CA
Residential Real Estate Agent serving SW RivCo CA

Paddy, so the FHA added fees are to fund ObamaCare? -- I completely forgot about that they have to find the money somehow. I also heard that the upfront higher fee for FHA can be added into the loan for a slightly higher interest rate for the borrower. So now they get to pay 30 years for ObamaCare!!! This is bad news for everyone. Many people this year had their healthcare insurance cancelled. The good news for some is not cancellation but they get to pay more for less services and higher deductibles.  

Jan 22, 2014 03:09 AM
Paddy Deighan MBA JD PhD
federalfinanciallawgroup.com - Vail, CO
Paddy Deighan J.D. Ph.D

yup, Pam..... .1% of every FHA loan now goes to fund Obamacare..increases cost to borrower fo the life of the loan!

Jan 22, 2014 03:14 AM
David Shamansky
US Mortgages - David Shamansky - Highlands Ranch, CO
Creative, Aggressive & 560 FICO - OK, Colorado Mtg

Its not about helping the small lender, they dont have lobbyists spending millions, its about nothing other than creating another round of TOO BIG TOO FAIL banks with minimal competition and a monopoly on the market. Amazing that America stands for the opposite of what it was founded on and based for fairness.

disgusting

Jan 22, 2014 12:07 PM
Paddy Deighan MBA JD PhD
federalfinanciallawgroup.com - Vail, CO
Paddy Deighan J.D. Ph.D

I agree David, it is not a level playng foeld and this is decidedly uncapitalistic and wrong

Jan 22, 2014 03:36 PM

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?