This has happened more than once and it is always upsetting.
You have worked with buyers and the buyers usually buy with a simple bank loan. You know what that is. They go to their banker who makes car loans or smaller loans of any type. That banker does NOT make 30 year fixed rate mortgages. The buyers have plenty of clout with the bank and can call the shots as he pleases and he knows he can get the money and he intends to get the simple loan.
You write the contract and fill it in saying the financing will be simple bank financing and it can close in two weeks. The seller is pleased because it will be easy and fast. The buyer goes to the banker and the banker is now pushing the mortgage department, which may make the bank more money. He tells the buyer that he should get this special investor 30 year mortgage or some kind of long term mortgage and refers them on to the mortgage department.
The banker, by doing that, is completely changing the terms of the original contract! He has actually made the buyer violate the terms of the contract. The time element is longer, more expenses will be incurred, a full-fledged appraisal has to be done, the buyer's ratios and income have to be in order and it has to go to an underwriter for final approval. What started out being a good deal for the seller has turned into a not-so-good-deal after all. We have to get amendments to the original contract.
The banker has put the contract in jeopardy. He has forced us to ask for new terms from the seller. What would the buyer say if the seller then said, "Since you are changing the terms of this contract, I'd like more money for my house."
When asked about why he has done this the banker will usually just say he was looking out for the best interests of his customer!
Comments(10)