Repayment of the First-Time Home Buyer Credit is contributing to low inventory levels?

By
Real Estate Agent CO: II100035296

Repayment of the First-Time Home Buyer Credit

 

Many of us have heard about the “low inventory” problem.    This problem is not in the high end/luxury market.    My theory is that the low inventory problem may be related, in part, to concerns related to the repayment of the First Time Home Buyer Credit, which was utilized by many buyers between 2008 and 2010.

 

I’ve talked to homeowners that are not selling because they would not have enough equity to purchase another home after repaying the credit.    

 

Before I go any further, here is the link to the IRS’s website page that discusses repayment of the First Time Home Buyer Credit.    http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc611.html .    

 

Each person’s tax situation is different.  For example if the home owner is/was in the military, different rules may apply.  Therefore, it is important to consult with a qualified Certified Public Accountant about your particular situation. 

 

Basically,

 

If you, the home owner, bought your home in 2008- You are liable for repayment of the credit for a total of 15 years or until you sell your home. 

 

If you bought your home in 2009 or 2010, if you sell your main home to an unrelated person or entity, you repay the credit only up to amount of the gain that you receive.    Of course, gain must be calculated per the IRS's rules.  Seek qualified help. 

Update:  Today I went back onto the IRS website and confirmed 

"You purchased your home in 2009 or 2010

Generally, you must repay the entire credit for the year you sell the home or it is no longer your main home. There are some exceptions to this rule, however, and you do not need to repay the FTHBC for a home you purchased in 2009 or 2010 if it remains your main home for the three years after the purchase."  

There are a few comments below that explain it a little better than I have done here.  

 

Regardless, there are some people that are not selling their homes right now because they purchased would have to repay the credit.

 

It becomes more complicated.

 

The chart below is from the IRS website.  I’ve highlighted some of the relevant statements. 

Repayment Triggers

 IF

AND

THEN

You bought a home in 2008 and received the first-time homebuyer credit

You sell the home to a related party within the next 15 years

You must repay the full amount of the credit, reduced by any amount of the credit that you previously repaid. You must complete Form 5405 and attach it to your federal tax return for the year you sold the home to report that you sold the home and to repay the unpaid balance of the credit.* This is required whether you had a gain or a loss on the property.

You bought the home in 2009 or 2010 and  received the first-time
homebuyer credit

You sell the home to a related party within 36 months of buying the home

You must repay the full amount of the credit. You must complete the Form 5405 and attach it to your federal tax return for the year you sold the home to report that you sold home and to repay the credit*. This is required whether you had a gain or a loss on the property.

You bought your main
home in 2008, 2009 or 2010

The home is destroyed or condemnedand you do not replace it by rebuilding or buying a new main home within two years of the event

You must repay the full amount of the credit. You must complete Form 5405 and attach it to your federal tax return for the year of the destruction or condemnation of the home to report the destruction or condemnation. You must also complete another Form 5405 and attach it to your federal tax return for the year in which the two-year period ends to report that you did not replace your main home within the two-year period and to repay the unpaid balance of the credit.* 

You bought your home in 2008, 2009 or 2010

You convert the home entirely to a business or rental property

You must repay the full amount of the credit. You must complete Form 5405 and attach it to your federal tax return for the year you convert the home to report that you converted the home and to repay the unpaid balance of the credit.*

 

Due to repayment provisions, the First Time Home Buyer Tax Credit's isn't exactly conducive increasing home inventory levels, conversion of homes to income producing property, or to the transfer to family members..... 

Update:  Today I went back onto the IRS website and confirmed 

"You purchased your home in 2009 or 2010

Generally, you must repay the entire credit for the year you sell the home or it is no longer your main home. There are some exceptions to this rule, however, and you do not need to repay the FTHBC for a home you purchased in 2009 or 2010 if it remains your main home for the three years after the purchase."  

There are a few comments below that explain it a little better than I have done here.  

Regardless, there are some people that are not selling their homes right now because they purchased would have to repay the credit.

 

Sincerely,

Sondra Meyer Peterson, CPA 

Certified Public Accountant - Texas
Colorado Horse Property Specialist
 

Comments (56)

Tessa Skeens
Hampton ReDesign, Home Staging and Redesign - Grand Junction, CO
Staging For Realtors, Builders & Investors

It's rare to get something for nothing and using government programs to buy a home requires eyes wide open.

Great research Sondra - I'm sure you've hit on one factor in why sellers are not in a hurry to put their home on the market this spring.

May 12, 2014 10:24 AM
Roseanne Campagna
John L. Scott RE Maple Valley, WA - Maple Valley, WA
Kent/DesMoines/Blk Diamond/Renton/Maple Valley, WA

Interesting thought and just might be contributing to that market segment. Thanks or posting the resource.

May 12, 2014 11:20 AM
Gary Woltal
Keller Williams Realty - Flower Mound, TX
Assoc. Broker Realtor SFR Dallas Ft. Worth

I will say if they took advantage of the credit to get into a house and then the market moved down, it is doubly cruel making you have negative equity. Tax credits are tricky and I had lengthy discussions with the IRS and insurance agents on something similar to get in trouble, Obamacare subsidies. Not subsidies but tax credits. If income varies to the wrong side, BIG pay back to the government in 2015. So many are unaware of this. The math challenged!

May 12, 2014 11:37 AM
John G. Johnston
John G. Johnston & Associates, LLC - Westcliffe, CO
An Exclusive Buyer's Agent ~ Westcliffe, CO

Sondra  Trust a CPA to look at 'options'.  I always appreciate new view points and this is one I never thought about.  

May 12, 2014 11:42 AM
Janice Zaltman
United Realty Group - Boca Raton, FL
South Florida Residential Real Estate

Thank you for educating us on this issue. Have not run across this as of yet in my market.

May 12, 2014 11:57 AM
Sharon Parisi
United Real Estate Dallas - Dallas, TX
Dallas Homes

CPA's are an important part of business transactions.  Most lenders in the Dallas area made the fine print clear to buyers.  If it seems too good to be true, check with your CPA.

May 12, 2014 01:10 PM
Travis "the SOLD man" Parker; Broker/Owner
Travis Realty - Enterprise, AL
email: Travis@theSOLDman.me / cell: 334-494-7846

Excellent info and thank you for the chart. It's gonna help A LOT!!

May 12, 2014 02:09 PM
Kirk Knight
Alain Pinel Realtors - Alameda, CA

Sondra,

I regret that I have to disagree with your hypothesis.

HERE'S THE CULPRIT - INTEREST RATES

The biggest problem is many existing owners have refinanced into 3-3.5% loans (some even hae 2.5% rates!).

Current loans of 4.5% represent as much as 13.5% reduced buying power for the same monthly payment. A 1% change in interest rate = 9% change in buying power. Meanwhile, prices are zooming upward on all properties, but proportions are less important than the actual cost of monthly payment.

DEMAND SUPPLY MISMATCH IN ADDITION TO LOW INVENTORY

In California, the total number of 2009 tax credits is about 13% of 2013 sales. Our inventory mismatch is literally a multiple - 300-400% demand to inventory. That 13% is insignificant blip in low inventory.

ACCELERATED TAX PAYMENT IS INSIGNICANT

Here in the SF Bay area, $5,000 accelerated tax payment is insignificant. That's what a 2008 buyer would pay to escape in 2014.

In 2008 a starter 2br 1ba 1,000 sq ft home was selling for $450K in 2008. Today it's $600K. 

In short, 2008 buyers won big by getting a house, enjoying 5 years of mortgage interest deduction, enjoying home ownership, and watching appreciation take off like a rocket. The tax break was icing on the cake. Paying back the 10 year remaining credit isn't a problem. 

May 12, 2014 04:49 PM
Millie C. Legenhausen
Calcagni Real Estate, Hamden, Connecticut - Hamden, CT
CRS, GRI, CIPS, MBA, Realtor

In Greater New Haven, people aren't selling due to lack of equity. Despite glowing statistics from other parts of the country, our prices are rising very slowly. We were up between 2-3% last year. The tax credit was an incentive to build communities, rather than focus on the investors and "flippers". I don't think it's made a big difference in our area.

May 12, 2014 09:53 PM
Anonymous
Josh P
Sondra, Your blog needs correction. In bold red font, you say "If you bought your home in 2009 or 2010, if you sell your main home to an unrelated person or entity, you repay the credit"....but in the chart below that, you say "You bought the home in 2009 or 2010 and You sell the home to a related party, you repay the credit." First you say "unrelated", then right below that it says "related". The correct answer is "related".
May 12, 2014 11:29 PM
#46
Amanda Christiansen
Christiansen Group Realty (260)704-0843 - Fort Wayne, IN
Christiansen Group Realty

Very interesting thoughts here Sondra.  I think in some cases this thought process would certainly apply.  

May 12, 2014 11:48 PM
Sondra Meyer:
Colorado Springs, CO
See It. Experience It. Live It.

Thank you all for your responses.  The responses were almost more interesting than my "theory" that I thought of the other night.    The more I think about it and the additional research that I've done into to the topic makes me tend to agree that the 1st time home buyer tax credit is only playing a small role in home owners unwillingness to sell.  

Kirk, I really hope that our current interest rates around 4.5% or so is not playing a major role.....  That could be scary because the interest rates will probably continue to climb instead of going back down as the economy improves.  There isn't too much room to go down but lots of room to go up....  That said, I'll concede - interest rates effect everyone that finances.  My "theory" effects a much smaller group.    

---------- 

The various responses also remind me about how real estate markets are often very different from each other.   Colorado Springs, which has four military installations, does not have the housing shortage other areas are facing either.   With my "theory" military transfers are reasons that a person would not have to repay a first time home buyer credit.  

----------

Josh P.  Thank you for your comment/concern.  I'm trying to think how to better clarify the point.  I carefully read your comment, what I wrote and went back to the sources that I was quoting from.  

The comment in red above the chart about the "unrelated person" was correct for home sold in 2009 or later or within 36 months of receiving the credit.  For that set of people, if they sell within 36 months to an UNRELATED person, the amount of credit that would have had to be repaid would have been limted to the gain.  Thus, if they sold at a loss, they might not have had to repay any gain.   (IRS tax topic 611 - 3rd paragraph "Exceptions to Repayment"  This is a favorable thing compared to the 2008 rules.  

The chart below discusses repayment to Related Parties (Family Members generally). In that case, even if the home owner sold at a loss - the entire amount of the credit would have to be repaid.  (The chart was from http://www.irs.gov/uac/First-Time-Homebuyer-Credit-1)  

Tax code can be very confusing.......

------------

As I've considered people's comments and looked into the topic further, the good news is that the majority of people that took advantage of the first time homebuyer tax credit did so in 2010.    Thus, the repayment concern should be a mute point by now.  I posted a link in one of my comments earlier above that showed breakdown by state of people that took advantage of the credits in 2009 and 2010.  

Bad news is that the people that purchased in 2008 and received the tax credit are still stuck with repaying their first time home buyer tax credit in most cases.  To date, I haven't been able to find the numbers of homeowners that took advantage of the 2008 tax credit.    

As usual, instead of responding to everyone here, I try to visit each ofyour blogs instead.  Due to the number of comments, it may take me a few days.  

 

 

 

  

 

 

May 13, 2014 05:52 AM
Gary Woltal
Keller Williams Realty - Flower Mound, TX
Assoc. Broker Realtor SFR Dallas Ft. Worth

Sondra, I didn't find the state by state numbers for 2008 either, but I did find them for New York state, in the below article at 45,865 taxpayers, so maybe with your later year numbers they scale.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/money/payback-time-first-time-homeowners-advantage-2008-tax-credit-article-1.138691

May 13, 2014 07:40 AM
Debbie Laity
Cedaredge Land Company - Cedaredge, CO
Your Real Estate Resource for Delta County, CO

I can see how this situation with the tax credit would keep people from listing their home. Although we didn't see a lot of people jumping on the credit in my area. We are seeing lower inventory, but it isn't a drastic amount yet. 

May 13, 2014 02:38 PM
Diana White-Pettis
Bennett Realty Solutions - Upper Marlboro, MD
GRI, CDPE, CNE, WHC Upper Marlboro Homes for Sale

Good post and good points.  I hadn't thought about this credit being contributed to the low inventory of homes.  Quite thought-provoking!  It pays to consult a CPA for guidance in this situation. Thanks for the information!

 

May 13, 2014 09:33 PM
Chandler Real Estate Liz Harris, MBA
Liz Harris Realty - Chandler, AZ
#ChandlerRealEstateAgent

Enjoyed this post today (wednesday) and look forward to more in the future.  Liz Harris in Chandler, AZ

May 14, 2014 06:58 AM
Gayle Rich-Boxman Fishhawk Lake Real Estate
John L Scott Market Center - Birkenfeld, OR
"Your Local Expert!" 503-755-2905

Sondra, I've missed you so stopped by and had completely missed this very thorough post. WOW. Alot of good discussion material. This kind of number-crunching and governmental info leaves my head spinning. 

Glad YOU tackled it! 

Hope you're doing well...just know that I'm thinking about you. 

Jun 04, 2014 02:55 AM
Les & Sarah Oswald
Realty One Group - Eastvale, CA
Broker, Realtor and Investor

This is great information for first time home buyers who took advantage of the tax credit. I will have to be on the alert with my clients who fit into this scenario! 

Jun 04, 2014 03:28 AM
Jeff Jensen
The Federal Savings Bank/Lending in 50 states - Greenwich, CT

It is really amazing the way some things can come back and bit you.

Jun 04, 2014 07:11 AM
Trey Thurmond
BCR Realtors - College Station, TX
College Station , Texas Homes

We only have a 2 month supply of homes  in the mid 200's and under.

Jul 09, 2014 03:09 PM

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?