Special offer

Why You Should Not Be Afraid Of A Trulia/Move Merger

By
Real Estate Technology with Home Value Leads

This article was originally published by me on the Home Value Leads blog entitled "Trulia/Move Merger Could Be Great For Realtors" and is being republished here for your consideration and discussion. 

Trulia Move Merger 300x267 Trulia/Move Merger Could Be Great For REALTORS

I have never hidden my dislike of the National Association of REALTORs, which is ironic because I am a member. My primary distrust and dislike of NAR stems from them allowing the monetization of its membership by Move, Inc who is the operator of realtor.com and the “membership by force” tactics that NAR uses. I’ve even suggested that the REALTOR brand had become obsolete.

Yesterday, a rumor surfaced that Trulia was potentially looking to acquire Move, Inc. The interwebs went crazy with dissension and complaints, but I think this could be great news for REALTORS.

How Could The Merger Be Great?

The original agreement between NAR and Move, Inc was written back in 1996. The agreement is what is known as “evergreen,” meaning that there is no expiration date. The agreement was also written very specifically with specific metrics that must be met, however those were metrics written in 1996.

I think we can all agree that a LOT has changed on the internet since 1996, right? For example, NAR requires that REALTOR.com have a minimum of 500,000 visitors each month. In 1996, that number was big, but fast forward 18 years and that number is peanuts. Realtor.com had 22.9 million visitors in February of 2014, but was eclipsed by Trulia with 27.4 million visits and Zillow commanding 52.2 million visits.

Under the original guidelines of the agreement, the acquisition of Move, Inc without NAR’s consent is grounds for termination of the agreement. This means that NAR could use this merger as a significant leverage point for negotiating a new, updated agreement that is more beneficial for NAR members. Since this merger is with Trulia, it is conceivable that NAR could push these negotiations to include Trulia.com in addition to Realtor.com.

Imagine if NAR required direct, “follow” links to each listing agent and broker’s website?  Removal or limitation of advertising on listings supplied by REALTOR associations?  An increase in fees payable to NAR by Trulia and Move?

The options are limitless and the significance cannot be understated.

Starting From Scratch?

What if Trulia and Move just decided to terminate the agreement and go through with the merger anyways? While there would be a transitional phase, NAR would not be starting from scratch. According to Move’s annual filing with the SEC,

If our operating agreement with the NAR was terminated, we would be required to transfer a copy of the software that operates the realtor.com® web site and provide the NAR with copies of our agreements with advertisers and data content providers, such as real estate brokers or MLSs. The NAR would then be able to operate the realtor.com® web site itself or with another third party.

 

 

This means that NAR would once again totally control and own Realtor.com without a third party involved.  The Trulia and Move Merger has generated some heated discussions, but when you stop to think about the different aspects of it, the Trulia/Move merger could be great for REALTORS.

Would love to hear your thoughts on the matter. Comment below.

Posted by

Brian Rayl

Licensed Dallas Real Estate Agent 

Co-Founder of Home Value Leads

What is Home Value Leads?

Seller Lead Generation Tool

Mitch Muller - Charlotte NC Real Estate
ProStead Realty Charlotte, NC CRS SRES mitch@prostead.com - Charlotte, NC
Certified Residential Specialist

Brian I agree with you wholeheartedly! Especially the membership by force as this caused me to shut down a secondary company of "non Realtors". (not to mention using our own data to sell leads back to us!) I was the owner of another company of "non Realtors" but because of NAR's rules, because I was a "Realtor" (mandatory to use MLS) all the members in both companies also had to be members. The purpose of the company was mostly a referral company so it was not necessary for them the pay all that extra money to be "Realtors". I also agree with Doug! They'll find a way to screw this up for us by acting in their own best interest. It's all about the dollars to them. NAR lost their way a long time ago.

Jun 21, 2014 12:12 AM
Gary Woltal
Keller Williams Realty - Flower Mound, TX
Assoc. Broker Realtor SFR Dallas Ft. Worth

Thanks for the update, I did not know any of this was going on.

Jun 21, 2014 12:53 AM
Sybil Campbell
Fernandina Beach, FL
Referral Agent Amelia Island Florida

Brian, thanks for your thoughts, very interesting.

 

Jun 21, 2014 01:05 AM
Joe Pryor
The Virtual Real Estate Team - Oklahoma City, OK
REALTOR® - Oklahoma Investment Properties

Brian, I think that being a REALTOR® is more relevant than ever, and my invovlement in committies like MLS Policy and with Chairmanships, as well as the effectiveness of RPAC and victories like with flood insurance, helping to defeat QRM among others makes this organization an imnperative to support. I certainly don't agree with every decision or move tyhat they make like with money expended on RPR, but I think without them life would be more difficult for us. Whatever happens with MOVE it remains to be seen what is good or bad. I was a part of the vote to expand what they can do and hopefully they will improve their position and ours.

Jun 21, 2014 02:19 AM
Richard Arnold
Keller Williams Realty East Valley - Tempe, AZ
Realtor - Tempe, Chandler, Mesa, Gilbert, Phoenix

I like what you're saying and hope this situation works to our benefit - or at the very least to our FREEDOM from Move, Inc.

 

Jun 21, 2014 02:49 AM
Brian Rayl
Home Value Leads - Highland Park, TX
Active Agent and Co-founder Of Home Value Leads

Wallace: DDOS attacks can cripple any business, and I don't hold that against Move (or NAR). Several big name companies, as listed in the article you reference, have been victim to DDOS attacks. Some have even gone out of business because of them. It is rumored that Facebook was even a victim at one point last week, although their services were only down for about 30 minutes. They certainly aren't an "old school" company, so it goes to show that any website can be affected. 

Winston: Thanks for the comment and compliment! 

Dick: A fear that I have as well. 

Doug: Two thoughts I had as well. I'm trying to think positively though. =)

Mitch: NAR actually doesn't receive "much" from Move, surprisingly. It looks like they get about $2 million per year according to SEC filings from Move. While that is a signficiant amount to most of us, considering Move is valued at nearly $600 million, maybe that puts it in perspective. 

Gary: Always a good idea to stay informed! Glad I could make that happen for you. 


Sybil: Glad you enjoyed it. 

Jun 21, 2014 02:56 AM
Brian Rayl
Home Value Leads - Highland Park, TX
Active Agent and Co-founder Of Home Value Leads

Joe: I wanted to respond to you individually because I happen to agree with you. I think the National Association of REALTORS provides a vital service to homeowners. In my article about the REALTOR brand being obsolete that I linked to above, I mentioned that their political activism and fight for homeowners is a vital need. However, the mission of NAR is to “help its members become more profitable and successful.” I don't see them doing this personally. I see them as a CONSUMER organization more than a REALTOR organization. They work to improve conditions for the homeowner, which I guess by reflection helps REALTORS (and non-realtors alike). 

That being said, I hope that they will negotiate on behalf of their MEMBERS when discussing this merger. Personally, I'd rather have an increase in dues in order for NAR to run Realtor.com themselves than have consolidation in the industry when usually results in higher prices and less service. 

I knew you were a stand up guy when I met you nearly 2 years ago at Agent Reboot. Unfortunately I don't go that far north in Oklahoma very often. We will have to get together again at some point. :)

Jun 21, 2014 03:10 AM
Brian Rayl
Home Value Leads - Highland Park, TX
Active Agent and Co-founder Of Home Value Leads

Rich: I hope so too. 

Jun 21, 2014 03:11 AM
Melissa Barkalow
DCRE Residential - Arlington, VA
Providing an Excellent Real Estate Experience

Thanks for the posting Brian.  That is a lot of food for thought and what it could ultimately mean for each of us Realtors out there, many of us who have to be members to gain access to local MLS databases.  

Jun 21, 2014 03:37 AM
Elizabeth Weintraub Sacramento Broker
Elizabeth Anne Weintraub, Broker - Sacramento, CA
Put 40 years of experience to work for you

I think the thing that seems to upset most people is that they want to believe that all of these for-profit websites and 503c nonprofit trade associations and whatnot have their best interest at heart and fail to understand there is no fiduciary, never was and never claimed to be. It is not their job to protect us or look out for us, it simply wants to monetize, and what's wrong with a desire for profit?

Jun 21, 2014 05:47 AM
Brian Rayl
Home Value Leads - Highland Park, TX
Active Agent and Co-founder Of Home Value Leads

Melissa: I am one of those Realtors by force so I know what you mean. 

Elizabeth: 1) In many areas, you are REQUIRED to be a REALTOR in order to be a part of the MLS. 
2) Their Mission Statement says that they help its members become more profitable and successful. That sounds like a duty to me, even if it is not a fiduciary one. 
3) I'm not saying Move or Trulia has to have our best interest at hearts. They are a for profit company and have their investor's interests (and pocketbooks) at heart. I'm saying that NAR should have OUR best interests at hearts because they are supposed to be helping us to become more profitable and successful (their words, not mine)

Jun 21, 2014 06:08 AM
Norma Toering Broker for Palos Verdes and Beach Cities
Charlemagne International Properties - Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Palos Verdes Luxury Homes in L.A.

Interesting thread.  The 1 billion dollar building is news to me, but I rarely read news from NAR--their skinny little magazine is short on news of value and usually hits the circular file without me leafing through it.  I've always found their value questionable and their fees too high.

Jun 21, 2014 06:55 AM
Bruce Kunz
C21 Solid Gold Realty, Brick, NJ, 732-920-2100 - Howell, NJ
REALTOR®, Brick & Howell NJ Homes for Sale

Thanks, Brian. Pretty much above my head, but anyone that makes an "evergreen" deal is an idiot.
Thanks for sharing & I'll be watching this closer.
Bruce.

 

Jun 21, 2014 06:56 AM
Maria Morton
Platinum Realty - Kansas City, MO
Kansas City Real Estate 816-560-3758

Interesting thoughts, Brian. The history of the NAR is certainly admirable and helped us (members) as well as home owners at one time. Much of what is going on with the NAR, Realtor.com, and Trulia in the present world has nothing to do with protecting and serving anyone. It is all about the power and money now. 

Jun 21, 2014 07:27 AM
Pamela Seley
West Coast Realty Division - Murrieta, CA
Residential Real Estate Agent serving SW RivCo CA

I too have heard about the merger on the internet. For whatever reason, the powers that be behind Realtor dot com aren't able to make the site number one. I think it's too early to tell if the merger if it happens is a good thing or bad for Realtors®. I was just thinking the other day, I wonder if it's even worth calling myself a Realtor® any more since the word is synonymous with "agent." Even 30-year brokers can't pronounce it correctly, and say REAL-A-TOR. Drives me nuts.

Jun 21, 2014 03:42 PM
Brian Rayl
Home Value Leads - Highland Park, TX
Active Agent and Co-founder Of Home Value Leads

Norma: A lot of what NAR does to benefit us is done behind the scenes such as lobbying congress and fighting for homeowners rights. Other than that? I'm just not seeing it...

Bruce: Evergreen is a fool's agreement, except for the party who is getting the benefit (Move in this case). 

Maria: NAR is SUPPOSED to be protecting us (helping us more profitable and successful to use their words). 

Jun 21, 2014 04:05 PM
Brian Rayl
Home Value Leads - Highland Park, TX
Active Agent and Co-founder Of Home Value Leads

Pamela, the reason that Realtor.com is not number 1 has a whole nother set of reasons behind that. Part of THAT is NAR's fault as well because they hamper some of the innovation behind the site. NAR has people on Move's board of directors and they have to approve just about any significant change to RDC. 

I don't use the REALTOR term much anymore for the exact same reasons. Nobody knows the difference and the title means jack when a newbie whose ink isn't even dry on his license yet can be (or is FORCED to be) a REALTOR. 

Jun 21, 2014 04:09 PM
Richie Alan Naggar
people first...then business Ran Right Realty - Riverside, CA
agent & author

The NAR needs something meaningful to do...When they discover what that is...we will all know and care...Until then...Real Estate is a business not a Moose club

Jun 21, 2014 11:22 PM
Elizabeth Weintraub Sacramento Broker
Elizabeth Anne Weintraub, Broker - Sacramento, CA
Put 40 years of experience to work for you

I think the difference in our outlook, Brian, is that I have worked for a trade association as a director and acquired initimate knowledge. I started out believing the warm touchy feeley public image until I participated in the inner workings, and then it dawned on me.

Jun 22, 2014 12:38 AM
Brian Rayl
Home Value Leads - Highland Park, TX
Active Agent and Co-founder Of Home Value Leads

Here is my follow up article for the many in here who seem discontent with NAR: Trade Dis-Association? Maybe It's Time to Give NAR The Boot

Enjoy :)

Jun 22, 2014 04:27 AM