To be specific, what does a quality appraisal mean to you? I read something one time that pointed out that quality means different things to different people. I am a real estate appraiser by profession and take great pride in my work, which would consist of the appraisal report being clear, concise, accurate, and complete. I’ve seen some reports where people do as little as possible, maybe by hitting the F3 key (an inside appraiser joke referring to canned comments assigned to one of the function keys on your computer keyboard), give as little explanation as possible, slap a value on it and call it a day. Others spend hours on market research, including detailed neighborhood analysis, write complete narrative reports and end with a final value that the reader of the report can understand because the writer made everything understandable.
I’m sure there are many other report quality variations between these two extremes but my main point revolves around the question of whether all this means anything to the person ordering/reading/using the report. What if the report that received the least amount of time and effort came in right on the money (the contract sales price), or what if the report that was well written, complete, and supported came in low and “killed” the deal. Which report would you say was a quality report? Would it be the one that made the deal work out or would it be the one that revealed that the buyer may not have been getting a good deal (which could open a door for negotiation and possibly save the buyer thousands of dollars)? I would be interested in reading peoples thoughts in addition to seeing whether the definition of quality is different for an appraiser, realtor, or mortgage loan officer, etc.
Comments(12)