A question was posed to me in an email from someone who read one of my posts on Active Rain. I would appreciate your thoughts on the matter. I have set forth my reply below.
Question: "I heard testimony yesterday that a notary did not get a fingerprint for a signature done in 2005. The document was a trust, which gave real property to a particular person. The notary also testified that he did not personally witness the signature. Do you see any problems?"
Dear ___________:
"In California, it is the law that notaries must obtain fingerprints for ALL documents concerning real property transactions, including trust deeds. From your email, I am not sure if it was a "trust" or a trust deed" that was notarized. Most California "trust deeds" require acknowledgments, whereby the notary is acknowledging that the person appeared before the notary. The document can already be signed, but the person must appear before the notary at the time of the notarization. I obtain fingerprints from every person for every document I notarize just to be on the safe side. I hope this helps."
Would you have asked or added anything?
Comments(10)