1031 Exchange - 2008 Farm Bill Affects Water Rights As Like Kind Property

By
Services for Real Estate Pros with The Law Offices of Elisabeth A. Lambert

 

ARE WATER RIGHTS LIKE-KIND PROPERTY?

 

On May 22, 2008, Congress enacted the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008 which is often referred to as the Farm Bill. Among other things, the Act amends IRC Section 1031(a)(2)(B) to exclude mutual ditch, reservoir or irrigation company stock from the definition of "stock." As a result, mutual ditch, reservoir or irrigation company stock should now be eligible in §1031 exchanges. In order to qualify for this treatment, the new law requires that ditch stock must be treated as an interest in real property under the law of the state in which the corporation is located.

So, what does this all mean? A little background information will help you understand it. For the most part, this very positive change will largely affect farmers and ranchers. However, it will also have an affect on areas (like California, New Mexico, Nevada, Colorado) where water is scarce and the state that recognizes water rights as REAL PROPERTY.

Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 1031 provides, in part, that no gain or loss is recognized on the exchange of property for other property of a "like-kind." In other words, to qualify for income tax deferral under §1031, the property relinquished in the exchange must be sufficiently like the property received in the exchange.

Fortunately, most property rights characterized as real property under state law are considered like-kind to other interests that are also considered real property under local law. Thus an easement or mineral right in most cases will be considered like-kind to a fee simple interest in real property and vice versa. If easements and mineral rights are considered like-kind to a fee simple interest in real property, then what about water rights?

In recent years, developers have been willing to purchase water rights at a significant premium and some economists expect the premium to increase in the future. Does a sale of water rights qualify for income tax deferral under §1031?

 

In most states, perpetual water rights are recognized as an interest in real property that would qualify as "like-kind" to a fee interest real property. See, e.g. Revenue Ruling 55-749, 1955-2 CB 295; IRS Letter Ruling 200404044. On the other hand, water rights that are limited in amount or duration may not be considered sufficiently like a fee interest in real property. In Weichens v. United States, 228 F. Supp. 1080 (Arizona - 2002), for example, the court held that the water rights in question were so limited in priority, quantity, and duration as to not be like-kind to a fee simple interest in real property.

DOES DITCH STOCK QUALIFY FOR §1031 DEFERRAL?

Like-kind issues also arise where water rights are owned indirectly. In some states, water is allocated among land owners by means of ditches. Ditches may be individually owned or may be "mutual" incorporated ditches. Water in incorporated ditches is allocated by shares issued by the company. The ditch shares represent proportional amounts of water rights held by the ditch company.

In most cases, stock certificates are issued by ditch companies. So, can ditch stock be exchanged for real property in a §1031 exchange? Section 1031(a)(2)(B) provides that "stocks, bonds or notes" may not be exchanged in a §1031 exchange. Thus, an exchanger cannot sell stock in a corporation that owns real property even if the underlying real property would qualify as like kind property. Under this reasoning, it would seem that a sale of ditch stock should not qualify for deferral under §1031.

 

THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR EDUCATIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE. INDIVIDUALS ARE STRONGLY ADVISED TO SEEK THE GUIDANCE OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL TAX AND LEGAL ADVISORS REGARDING THEIR SPECIFIC FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES.

Lisa A. Lambert, Esq.             559.433.5399 or LisaL@apiexchange.com

Asset Preservation,  Inc.      800.282.1031 or info@apiexchange.com or www.apiexchange.com

 

Comments (3)

Michael A. Caruso
Surterre Properties - Laguna Niguel, CA

Hi Lisa,

I just wanted to let you know how beautiful those pictures are, they really caught my eye.  Have a great 4th.  Michael A. Caruso

Jul 02, 2008 12:45 PM
Lisa Lambert
The Law Offices of Elisabeth A. Lambert - Fresno, CA
Esq. 1031 Exchange Expert

Michael:

Thanks for visiting and leaving a comment. I really appreciate it. I found the photos through Microsoft's clip art. I'm glad you appreciated them.

Lisa

Jul 02, 2008 12:48 PM
Alix Pinzon
Open Mortgage, LLC NMLS # 2975 - Downey, CA
(562)743-6086

Hi Lisa,  I'm an Appraiser with a quesiton for you.  I would appreciate any insight that you can offer.  My concern is how to collect from deadbeat AMC's (Appraisal Managment Companies), in the event that they go bankrupt, or just choose not to pay me.  I haven't worked for AMC's yet, but I want to be proactive.  I'm wondering if I can get the client to sign a form that will allow me to collect from them, in the event that the AMC's doesn't pay.  I doubt that the AMC's will like that, but until I've established a relationship with any company, I like to have the upper hand.  I don't know the legal ramifications of this, since the borrower is not the client, but they will be a benefactor of the appraisal.  Can you let me know what you think about this, or ask around to see if this is legal, and enforcable?  I may be interested in hiring you to assist me in drafting a form, again, if it's legal and enforceable.  Thanks for your time.

Feb 08, 2009 11:07 AM