I recently had a discussion with some real estate leaders in our state, and we were discussing the Days on Market indicator. It seems that many agents are pushing to get this data point eliminated in the system. Here are the arguments:
- Days on Market (DOM) is always a true picture. The number of days can be tweaked by agents in a variety of ways, depending on the system. Therefore, this number that many consumers and agents use to determine offer strategies is not always a true picture.
- DOM is not the end-all data point. Speciality properties such as luxury, commercial, or really unique properties will typically remain on the market for a longer period of time. When the DOM reflects a longer selling time, many will take this to mean there is something wrong with the property. That is not always the case.
- If the property was marketed on a private, non-MLS strategy, these days will not be a true story of actual days on market. This alone can be very misleading to consumers.
- Buyers like the DOM as they use it as a negotiation tool. As stated above, this may or may not be accurate, and a buyer may rely on this number too much, which could negatively affect their negotiation.
- Sellers may like the DOM factor to go away so they can get rid of a "time" stigma. They can then focus on creative marketing strategies with their agent.
- Many unique properties on the market may not have been around even 10 years ago. As building and designs have changed, is the DOM data point outdated?
This is an interesting debate, and I would love to hear from my real estate colleagues on this one. What's the discussion on this topic in your neck of the woods? I will be keeping my eye on this topic.

Comments(19)