The Future of Housing | Week 1
Most developers don't misunderstand modular because they've never built with it. They misunderstand it because they're trying to solve the wrong problem.
The first question I usually hear is, "Will modular reduce my construction costs?" My answer is often, "You're asking the wrong question."
Modular isn't simply another way to build a project. It's another way to run a development business.
Every stakeholder looks at modular differently. Developers want lower costs. Manufacturers need earlier decisions. Architects want design flexibility. Lenders want certainty. Investors want stronger IRRs. Contractors want predictable schedules.
None of them are wrong.
The problem is that everyone is optimizing their own piece of the puzzle while almost no one is optimizing the entire system.
That's why so many modular projects underperform. The team designs a conventional project, secures approvals, and only then asks the factory to make it modular. By that point, many of the decisions that create efficiency have already been made.
Modular is not another subcontractor. It is not a value engineering exercise. It is a different project delivery system.
The greatest advantage isn't lower cost. In some cases, modular may cost the same or even more. The real advantage is compressing the development schedule. Earlier revenue. Lower carrying costs. Reduced execution risk. Better returns.
The developers who consistently win don't ask, "How do I fit modular into my project?"
They ask, "How do I redesign my project around industrialized construction?"
Those are two completely different strategies.
Housing doesn't have a construction problem.
It has a systems integration problem.
The companies that recognize that first won't just build projects faster. They'll build more valuable businesses.
This is Week 1 of my new series, The Future of Housing, exploring how every stakeholder sees the housing ecosystem differently, and why aligning those perspectives is the key to solving America's housing challenges.
Comments(3)