There is a question I think we need to ask more often about new construction:
Who is actually controlling the transaction?
In a resale transaction, the answer feels straightforward.
The seller has a home to sell. The buyer has a home to buy. The agents help bring the two sides together, negotiate terms, manage the process, and keep the transaction moving.
New construction is different.
By the time a buyer walks into a builder's sales center, much of the transaction has already been designed.
- The builder controls the contract.
- The builder establishes the incentive structure.
- The builder sets the construction process and timeline.
- The builder determines what is included in the base price and what becomes an upgrade.
- The builder controls the selections process.
- The builder establishes the warranty terms.
- The builder has a defined sales process designed to move a buyer from interest to purchase.
None of that is a criticism.
It's the builder's business.
The builder is supposed to have a process for selling and delivering its product.
The more interesting question is what happens to the agent's role inside that process.
Maybe the Agent Doesn't Need to Control the Transaction
I think we've sometimes given agents the wrong objective in new construction.
We tell them they need to “control the transaction.”
But can they?
Should they?
The builder isn't handing over control of the contract, construction schedule, selections process, or warranty.
And trying to insert the agent into every part of that process can create an unnecessary fight over something the agent was never going to own.
There is another way to look at the role.
The builder controls the transaction.
The agent helps protect the buyer's decision within it.
That is a very different job.
What Does the Agent Actually Control?
More than it might seem.
The agent controls the questions being asked.
- They can ask why an incentive is structured the way it is rather than simply repeating the dollar amount.
- They can help the buyer understand the difference between the base price and the price of the home the buyer actually wants.
- They can bring attention to the homesite, lot premium, HOA, CDD, insurance, taxes and other costs that don't necessarily appear in the headline price.
- They can ask what is known about future development around the community.
- They can help the buyer distinguish between something that is included, something that is optional and something that may become necessary for the way the buyer intends to live.
- They can slow down a decision that is being driven primarily by emotion.
And they can ask the uncomfortable question:
- “Before we say yes, what haven't we considered?”
That may be far more valuable than trying to be the person who knows every answer.
The Model Home Is Not the Transaction
This is one of the easiest traps in new construction.
A buyer walks into a beautiful model.
They see the upgraded kitchen.
The oversized island.
The designer lighting.
The outdoor living space.
The landscaping.
The furniture.
The finishes.
They fall in love.
And why wouldn't they?
That's what the model is designed to do.
But the buyer isn't necessarily buying that house.
They're buying a floor plan on a particular homesite, with a particular set of structural and design selections, subject to a particular contract, at a particular price, in a particular community that may still be changing.
The emotional decision can happen before the financial and practical decision has been fully evaluated.
That's where the agent matters.
Not because the agent should kill the excitement.
Because someone needs to help the buyer understand what the excitement actually means.
The Agent's Job Isn't to Say No
This is important.
Buyer advocacy in new construction shouldn't mean becoming the person who finds a problem with everything.
That's not helpful either.
The agent doesn't need to tell the buyer:
“Don't buy this.”
The better question is:
“Do you understand what you're saying yes to?”
Those are very different conversations.
A good agent can be excited with the buyer about the house while still asking about the things that aren't exciting.
- What will the total monthly cost be?
- What will the buyer actually pay for the homesite?
- Which features shown in the model are included?
- What happens if construction is delayed?
- What does the contract say about changes?
- What does the warranty actually cover?
- What will the neighborhood look like when it is complete?
- What costs could change?
- What does the buyer give up by choosing this home over another one?
Those aren't negative questions.
They're decision-making questions.
Expertise Isn't Control
This may be the biggest shift I think agents need to make.
Expertise in new construction isn't about knowing more than the builder.
- The builder knows more about building the builder's homes.
- The builder knows its construction process.
- The builder knows its contract.
- The builder knows its incentive programs.
The agent doesn't need to compete with that knowledge.
The agent needs to bring a different kind of expertise to the table.
The expertise of helping the buyer evaluate the decision.
That means knowing what to question.
Knowing what to compare.
Knowing what deserves a second look.
Knowing what isn't obvious.
And knowing when the buyer needs more information before making a decision.
So What Does the Agent Control?
- Not the builder's contract.
- Not the construction schedule.
- Not the incentive program.
- Not the selections department.
- Not the warranty.
But the agent can influence something much more important:
How the buyer makes the decision.
That's the part of the transaction where I believe the agent's value becomes clearer — not by trying to control what isn't theirs to control, but by making sure the buyer doesn't surrender control of the decision simply because they fell in love with the house.
The builder's job is to sell the home.
The agent's job is to help the buyer decide whether they should buy it.
Those are two different jobs.
And I think new construction gets a lot more interesting when we stop pretending they're the same.
What do you think an agent actually controls in a new-construction transaction?
I'd genuinely like to hear how other agents approach this.
Comments(5)