Some homes carry a heavy past- murder or suicide, drug activity, hoarding conditions, or other traumatic events.
These situations create what the industry calls a “stigmatized property.” Even when the physical structure is repaired, the emotional weight can linger for future buyers. After the recent heartbreaking case in Massachusetts involving Lindsay Clancy and the tragic murder of her three children, many people have asked how a home with such a history could ever be sold - and whether that information must be disclosed.
Massachusetts Disclosure Law: What MUST Be Shared
Massachusetts is very clear on this point: A seller or real estate agent is not required to disclose a death, suicide, homicide, felony, or other “psychologically impacted” event that occurred in a home. This is outlined under M.G.L. Chapter 93, Section 114, which specifically states that these facts are not material defects and therefore do not require disclosure.
Agents must disclose physical defects, known hazards, and issues affecting the property’s condition or title—but not past crimes or tragedies.
However… Buyers CAN Ask
If a buyer directly asks about a death or crime in the home, the seller or agent cannot lie. They may decline to answer, but they cannot provide false information. Many agents choose to answer honestly to maintain trust and avoid future disputes.
How Buyers Can Research a Home’s History
Because Massachusetts does not require disclosure of stigmas, buyers who care about a home’s past should take proactive steps:
Google the address – News articles often reference the exact location.
Search public records – Police logs, court records, and town meeting minutes can reveal past issues.
Check the Registry of Deeds – Look for foreclosures, liens, or unusual transfers.
Talk to neighbors – They often know the history better than anyone.
Review police call logs – Many departments publish them online.
Use specialty websites – Some track crimes, drug raids, or other incidents by address.
A stigmatized home can be sold, and many eventually are. Some buyers are unfazed; others want full transparency. In Massachusetts, the responsibility ultimately falls on the buyer to investigate the home’s past.
Comments(7)