Admin

Sex Offenders On and OFF the LIST

By
Services for Real Estate Pros with Business Attorney and Success Advisor

Did you know that in Idaho sex offenders can ask to have their name removed from the sex offender registry?  That's right...a person can sexually molest a child, be convicted, do time or probation and THEN ASK TO BE REMOVED FROM THE ONLY WARNING SYSTEM WE HAVE IN THIS STATE.  Yes, I believe people can change...but the reality is re-offense among sex offender is very high.  Shouldn't the protection of children come ahead of a single person's desire to be removed from the sex offender registry?  If a person is convicted of horrible crime, is there ever a time they should be able to hide that from the public or from protective parents? 

How will parents know they're living next to a sex offender if the person is removed from the list?  How will parents know their children are going to the home of a sex offender if the offender has children of his or her own (or marries into a relationship with children...as ridiculous and idiotic as that sounds).

I have a very personal interest in keeping sex offenders on the list.  With two daughters of my own, it's very important to me to keep them safe...and I know other parents share that feeling.  If you didn't know sex offenders can ask to be de-listed, now you know.

Comments(2)

Show All Comments Sort:
Bill Gassett
RE/MAX Executive Realty - Hopkinton, MA
Metrowest Massachusetts Real Estate

Wow that is really strange! Is Idaho the only state that does it this way? What is the point of having a list if it is not accurate.

Aug 18, 2008 12:51 AM
Jason Romrell
Business Attorney and Success Advisor - Los Angeles, CA

Wow...after 1 month, this blog gets 2 comments.  Very cool.  I love polite, civil debate.  I think Rich's point would be a lot stronger if he actually had references for the public urination claim (in Idaho that's not usually a sex offense that puts you on the list) and the stat about reoffenders.  Of course, statistics lie (or liars can misuse statistics if you're into politics), but the fact remains...children are NOT able to protect themselves and we have an obligation to our children (or any child) to minimize risk when it comes to sexual abuse.  In some cases (in this the greatest country in the world) individual freedom has to take second place to other needs.

Sep 12, 2008 09:15 AM