Special offer

Web access for the blind

By
Real Estate Agent with Coastal Properties Group International - Christie's International

Target stores agreed to a $6 million settlement because its website was not suitably accessible for the blind, accoording to an article in the Wall Street Journal today. I don't know much about the screen reading software mentioned, but I'd have to agree with Target that I thought the Americans with Disabilities Act referred only to physical buildings.

Have any of you considered whether your site complies with the Disabilities Act? How accessible is your site to the blind? I have to admit I've never considered whether the blind could access my website and my blogs.

 

Posted by

Sharon Simms
CIPS CRS CLHMS CRB RSPS
Coastal Properties Group
CHRISTIE'S International Real Estate
238 Beach Drive NE
St Petersburg, FL 33701
www.ssimms.com    www.coastalpgi.com   www.christiesrealestate.com
(727) 898-2582    Sharon@SimmsTeam.com

 

Neal Bloom
Brokered by eXp Realty LLC - Weston, FL
Realtor CRS-Weston FL Real Estate

Sharon,

I guess a consumer complained and they don't want to cause a ruckus. That's a lot of money!

Aug 28, 2008 01:11 AM
Sharon Simms
Coastal Properties Group International - Christie's International - Saint Petersburg, FL
St. Petersburg FL - CRS CIPS CLHMS RSPS

Neal - I think if we had a loser pays all legal system we wouldn't have as many spurious lawsuits hoping that the defendant will settle rather than spend the time and legal fees to defend themselves.

Aug 28, 2008 01:14 AM
Randy L. Prothero
eXp Realty - Hollister, MO
Missouri REALTOR, (808) 384-5645

I am sure they settled to limit negative press.  I just wonder what it would take to make a website more accessible.

Aug 28, 2008 01:21 AM
Patricia Kennedy
RLAH@properties - Washington, DC
Home in the Capital

Sharon, good grief!  I had no idea that ADA applied to web sites.  I know there has been a lot of progress with software people can buy to help them through the Internet with various disabilities.  If I had been Target, I might have fought this one. 

Aug 28, 2008 01:25 AM
Missy Caulk
Missy Caulk TEAM - Ann Arbor, MI
Savvy Realtor - Ann Arbor Real Estate

Sharon, I tag my photos with alt tags so they can know what the photo is about. Interesting, thanks for giving us a heads up.

Aug 28, 2008 01:31 AM
Harold "Hal" Place
A1 Connection Realty, Inc. - Sun City Center, FL

Morning Sharon,

Just goes to show you that there is an on going learning experience all thru our lives. I had no idea the ADA was so emcompassing. Thanks for sharing.

Aug 28, 2008 01:43 AM
Mott Marvin Kornicki
Waterway Realtors® • Notary Public & Apostille - Sunny Isles, FL
Miami Notary & Apostille 786-229-7999

There are so many things to do to comply with EVERYTHING! I'm very surprised that Target or for that matter any person or company could lose a lawsuit on Internet Accessibility.

Aug 28, 2008 02:57 AM
Retired Notworking
Tallahassee, FL

Very interesting. Not sure what a web site needs to do to be accessible to blind people, but wonder how putting alt tags helps.

Aug 28, 2008 04:10 AM
Retired Notworking
Tallahassee, FL

Well, here is an answer to the question I just asked about web accessiblity guidelines.

http://trace.wisc.edu/world/web/index.html#awsgI

I now realize that use of alt tags on pictures allows people who have limited sight to increase the font size so they can see it.  I had mistakenly thought that this was referring to people with no sight at all.

Aug 28, 2008 04:20 AM
Debbie DiFonzo
Debbie DiFonzo - United Country VIP Realty, SW Missouri - Lebanon, MO
Lebanon MO and Buffalo Missouri Real Estate

Sounds like the same attorney that had the McDonald's hot coffee lawsuit. Crazy stuff. I think $6 million is way too excessive!

Aug 28, 2008 06:48 AM
Robert Vegas Bob Swetz
Las Vegas, NV

Sharon - Congratulations on your 400k plus, I found your name on another persons post.

Aug 28, 2008 11:55 AM
Rob Brown
Agent Revenue - Peel, ON

This is a common concern of professional web developers.  Taking into account every possible user is key to the strong development of any marketing effort including the web.

Making websites accessible to people who use it in non-traditional methods isn't that hard.  If you have a standards compliant (google: wc3) website then you're defiantly on the right track.

Removing flash components and ensuring that your images all have ALT tags is a great place to start to ensure that people using screen readers and the like can find value in your online marketing effort.

Aug 28, 2008 12:02 PM
Sharon Simms
Coastal Properties Group International - Christie's International - Saint Petersburg, FL
St. Petersburg FL - CRS CIPS CLHMS RSPS

Randy - maybe, but I think it's still about all the hassle and expense involved in the defense - especially if they won at the first level, then had appeals, etc.

Pat - sometimes it's priciple vs. practicality. Hopefully a settlement doesn't become precedent.

Missy - I thought the ALT tags were just for search engines - didn't know they helped in other ways.

Hal - just when we thought we knew what the laws meant....

Mott - they didn't lose the case, they settled.

Colleen - I hadn't considered those with slight sight, only those that were totally blind.

Debbie - I still think that if the loser had to pay for the defendant's lawyers and costs, we'd have less crazy suits.

Robert - thanks! I've been blogging for quite a while.

Rob - while we should definitely make efforts to accomodate everyone, it doesn't make sense to me to remove flash or other elements that would improve the experience for the majority.

 

 

Aug 28, 2008 12:32 PM
Jennifer Fivelsdal
JFIVE Home Realty LLC | 845-758-6842|162 Deer Run Rd Red Hook NY 12571 - Rhinebeck, NY
Mid Hudson Valley real estate connection

Sharon - Thanks for this update, what does this mean for other industries?  I suppose we will all need some guidlines, I too was under the impression the law applied to a physical location. 

Aug 28, 2008 01:27 PM
William Johnson
Retired - La Jolla, CA
Retired

Wow, Sharon, This is beyond anything I have ever known about. I suppose I will need to check this out. What next?

Aug 28, 2008 04:09 PM
Rob Brown
Agent Revenue - Peel, ON

>> Rob - while we should definitely make efforts to accommodate everyone, it doesn't make sense to >> me to remove flash or other elements that would improve the experience for the majority.

Don't get me wrong, flash is a great tool.  However, not only does it have a negative effect on the ability of search engines to read your content, but it has a negative effect on the variety of different ways that the web can be read by humans too.

It is easier for a search engine or screen reader to interpret a photo gallery of your homes that has been programmed in javascript rather then flash.  The photo gallery could look almost identical, but to screen readers, mobile phones, search engines, etc your web site will be accessible.

Flash isn't really the problem though, it's a way of thinking about making your websites accessible that makes a difference.  Ensuring that your web developer creates standards compliant (google: wc3) pages is a great start.

Aug 28, 2008 10:21 PM