Admin

Non attorney closings in Georgia - unauthorized practice of law

By
Real Estate Attorney with Mozley, Finlayson & Loggins LLP

Georgia is one of those states - only attorneys are legally supposed to close real estate transactions - with very limited exceptions.  Yet, non-attorney entities constantly close deals here in Georgia.

There are several other states that define real estate closings as the practice of law - South Carolina, Alabama, North Carolina, New York, Connecticut and Massachusetts.  The common justification in these jurisdictions is that the state regulates the bar and can police unscrupulous practitioners.  The Georgia Supreme Court has held that closing attorneys have a duty to the public.  While it is left unsaid in the opinion, the fact is that real estate as a form of property is central to the well being of our economy - and has been since the founding of our country.  You don't have to look to far to see how failure to properly safeguard property rights can impact all of us.

In return for this exclusive franchise, attorneys must look to maintain the public records so that they accurately reflect the interests of persons in real estate.  This often means delaying a closing to be certain that old defects are cured.  Since attorneys hold the keys to the courthouse, they have a higher legal obligation to make sure that the rights of the various parties to closing are properly handled.

If you are considering using a notary service to close a transaction in Georgia, just remember that aiding the unauthorized practice of law (UPL) is as much of a crime in Georgia as committing the crime itself.  UPL is a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail or a fine of $1,000.00 or both.

Given the amount of money involved in the financing, purchase and sale of real estate, who would you rather have supervise your deal - an attorney familiar with the local property records and real estate laws or a notary public that works for an out of state closing company?

Comments(4)

Show All Comments Sort:
Laurie Mindnich
Centennial, CO

Brian, having relocated from a state that did NOT require that consumers use attorneys for closings, my first thought is that a $1000.00 fine (not the jail part) might be well worth spending absent the atty fee, which at least in NY, is in excess of that. If a consumer doesn't want/need the legal contingent involved, they shouldn't be forced. The unauthorized practice of law position for simple legal documents (as evidence in states without it) isn't brain surgery. I'm guessing that those that really want a lawyer involved in their real estate transaction (as many do) wouldn't permit their absence. The notary thing I know nothing about; title company closing coordinators presented docs and handled the closings in Colorado.

Sep 02, 2008 08:42 AM
Frances Sanderson
Bean Group / Franklin - Franklin, NH

Hi Brian,

Thank you for your thought-provoking blog. Here in New Hampshire, Notaries can legally close transactions, and personally, I haven't seen any negative repercussions as a result. I chose to do a little further research on this and found a rebuttal, if you wish, on the National Notary Association website below. Do you have a comment about the issue they raise in regards to creating a real estate monopoly for attorneys?

http://www.nationalnotary.org/news/index.cfm?Text=newsNotary&newsID=1152

Just curious. I have no real opinion either way.

Frances Sanderson, Franklin, NH  REALTOR®, Certified EcoBroker®

Sep 02, 2008 08:52 AM
Brian M. Dubuc
Mozley, Finlayson & Loggins LLP - Marietta, GA

Good morning:

Thanks for the posts.  This debate has been ongoing for years - most recently in North Carolina.

The Georgia Supreme Court has defined a "closing" as that whole series of events begining with the title search, issuing an opinion of who has interests in the subject property and culminating in the transfer of those interests.  I agree that supervising the execution of documents is not brain surgery.  Explaining what the documents mean to a borrower or seller does require particular knowledge of real estate secured lending as well as state and federal laws governing residential real estate mortgages.

Part of the issue too may be that Georgia is a non-judicial foreclosure state.  The Georgia Supreme Court may be of the opinion that attorney involvement in the loan closing ameliorates the possibly harsh result in transactions that end up in foreclosure - although Georgia is high on the list of states for numbers of foreclosures.

There is no doubt that defining real estate closings as the practice of law does create a "monopoly" for attorneys in Georgia.  That has not adversely impacted consumers though since there are a large number of closing attorneys - compare that to states in which the large title insurance companies have direct operations and you will find that the number of providers of closing services vendors is much lower.

Thanks for taking the time to comment!

Sep 03, 2008 02:18 AM
Laurie Mindnich
Centennial, CO

Brian, great post- thank you. For those of us located in attorney states, the input is of value.

Sep 03, 2008 02:53 PM