Internet Defamation Lawyer (California and Arizona)

By
Real Estate Attorney with The Law Offices of Steven C. Vondran, P.C. Attorney at Law

INTERNET DEFAMATION / ONLINE SLANDER AND LIBEL / CIVIL HARASSMENT

      Is someone trying to make your life miserable on the internet?  Are they making defamatory, libelous or slanderous statements about you, your family, or your company?

      Have you tried to get the postings or listings taken down to no avail.  Have you asked the perpetrator to stop with no success?

     Today, we are seeing all sorts of ploy on the internet that attempt to drag someone's name or their company through the mud.

     Disgruntled employees are setting up websites or making online postings that defame their former boss or place of employment.

     Angry medical patients are starting blogs and posting websites that state false statements of fact and down right defamatory content about their doctors or surgeons.

     Students are bullying other students online or defaming their teachers by making false accusations on internet websites such as myspace.com, friendster.com, facebook.com, and free eblogger sites.

     These defamatory postings threaten to damages the victims reputation in the community and may cause serious mental, emotional and career damage.

      If all this sounds oh so familiar, contact us to see if there is a service we can provide to help eliminate, or alleviate the online defamation, cyber-bullying or civil harassment situation.

DIGITALDEFAMATION.COM                                               

 

                                              PROTECT YOUR GOOD NAME & REPUTATION

     Defamatory Postings ж Corporate Tarnishing ж Private Photos and Videos ж False and Misleading Statements ж Exposing Personal Details  Blackmail  ж  Hate Speech  ж Smear Campaigns  ж Cyber-harassment  Cyber-bullying ж Hate e-Mail

DIGITALLY PUBLISHED AND DISTRIBUTED ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB AND STORED ON INTERNET SERVERS POTENTIALLY FOR ETERNITY 

ITS TIME TO FIGHT BACK!

CALL
877-276-5084
IF YOUR BELIEVE YOU CORPORATE GOOD NAME OR PERSONAL REPUTATION IS BEING TARNISHED, DAMAGED, OR INJURED, CONTACT US FOR A FREE CONSULTATION

PROOF ELEMENTS FOR DEFAMATION

(1) A FALSE STATEMENT OF FACT (EXPRESSLY STATED OR BY INNUENDO)

Your attorney needs to be able to affirmatively PROVE the false statement of fact.  Opinions are protected free speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.  It must truly be an opinion however.

 (2) ABOUT A PERSON OR CORPORATION WHO IS REASONABLY IDENTIFIABLE

Under the law, a Corporation is treated as a "person" believe it or not.  Note:  You cannot defame the dead (how are you going to hurt their reputation of a dead person?)

(3) PUBLISHED TO A THIRD PARTY

"Publication" generally requires that a third person (someone besides the target of the defamation) actually see or hear the defamatory statement.  Making false statements of fact when no one is around is NOT defamatory for legal purposes.
 
            (4) STATEMENT TENDS TO INJURE THE REPUTATION OF THE PERSON OR CORPORATION OR PRODUCT

Hard feelings.  Anger.  Embarrassment.  This is normally NOT enough injury to bring a lawsuit for defamation.  Usually, there needs to be a definite and distinct injury to the reputation of Plaintiff before the Court's will allow a recovery.  For good reason, defamation is referred to as the Tort of the Rich and Famous!  It is much easier for a famous persons to establish there injury.  There are four SPECIAL CATEGORIES, where damages to the REPUTATION OF THE person or corporation are presumed. 

(i.) Publicating to a third party that a woman is UNCHASTE

(ii.) False statements of fact concerning a person's BUSINESS or PROFESSION

(iii.)  Publicating to a third party that a person has a LOATHSOME DISEASE

(iv.) Publicating to a third party that a person has been convicted of a CRIME INVOLVING MORAL TURPITUDE
__________________________________________________________________________

THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF DEFAMATION:
 
LIBEL
=
Written Defamation  /  SLANDER = Spoken Defamation

 

California Civil Code: Law of Libel and Slander Defamation

__________________________________________________________________________

CALL
877-276-5084
IF YOUR BELIEVE YOU CORPORATE GOOD NAME OR PERSONAL REPUTATION IS BEING TARNISHED, DAMAGED, OR INJURED, CONTACT US FOR A FREE CONSULTATION

or visit The Law Offices of Steven C. Vondran on the web at www.VondranLaw.com

Put a Stop to Online Defamation and Digital "Trash-Talking

 

"Truth"
is an absolute defense to a defamation claim.
But keep in mind that the truth may be difficult and expensive to prove if you are named as a Defendant.

_______________________________________________________________

OPINIONS
are protected Free Speech under the First Amendment!
Note: merely labeling a statement as your "opinion" does not always make it so.  For example is a speaker says: "In my opinion you have AIDS"  although the speaker prefaced the statement by saying it was just an "opinion" if it can be affirmatively proven that the subject of the speech did not have AIDS, then the statement is defamatory.

     In deciding whether the statement is one of fact, or opinion, the Courts often use the "reasonable listener test" (meaning, would a reasonable listener, given the context of the communication, have concluded that the speaker was asserting a statement of fact). If so, the "opinion" becomes potentially  actionable as a defamatory statement of fact.

The Law Offices of Steven C. Vondran EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: TIPS ON AVOIDING DEFAMATION (Coming Soon)

______________________________________________________________________________

THERE ARE TWO
 FIRST AMENDMENT
CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES
TO BE AWARE OF:

(1) THE SPECIAL PROOF CHALLENGE WHEN SUING THE MEDIA:

A Plaintiff who wishes to sue a media defendant for defamation (ex. suing the radio station or newspaper company) must show at least "negligence" on the part of the media defendant in order to recover.

If the Plaintiff happens to be a Public Figure / Public Official (discussed below) then they must prove "actual malice" on the part of the media defendant.

ACTUAL MALICE:  Means you must show that the media defendant had KNOWLEDGE of the FALSITY of the statement, or that the media defendant acted in RECKLESS DISREGARD for ascertaining and reporting the truth.  This can be a tough challenge to overcome, but is not insurmountable.

The Law Offices of Steven C. Vondran EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: IS A WEB BLOG PUBLISHER A MEDIA DEFENDANT ENTITLED TO THE "ACTUAL MALICE" STANDARD?

(2) THE SPECIAL CHALLENGE OF A "PUBLIC FIGURE" / "PUBLIC OFFICIAL" PLAINTIFF:

Public Figure:  These are your sports stars, movie stars, tv stars, and those who "thrust themselves into a controversy."

Public Official:  These are your politicians, and elected officials

THE PUBLIC HAS A LEGITIMATE RIGHT TO COMMENT ON THE ACTIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF PUBLIC FIGURES AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.  THIS IS THE CORNERSTONE OF A FREE SOCIETY - TO ENGAGE IN FREE AND OPEN DEBATE WITH A FREE FLOW OF IDEAS.  THIS IS THE HEART AND SOUL OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

Consequently, the burden will be on your attorney to prove the elements of "actual malice" (cited above) if you are a public figure or public official plaintiff.

_____________________________________________________________________________

 SOME OTHER GOOD DEFENSES FOR A DEFENDANT IN A DEFAMATION LAWSUIT INVOLVING EITHER LIBEL OR SLANDER

QUALIFIED IMMUNITIES ("Qualified" means if the speaker abuses the privilege - she loses the privilege).  There may be more or less defenses available depending on the jurisdiction.

(1) Attorneys, Judges, and Legislators, in the course and scope of their duties, have a qualified immunity

(2) Witnesses at a trial also normally enjoy a qualified immunity so that they may testify truthfully

(3) Politicians in the course and scope of their legislative duties while on the floor have a qualified immunity

Note:  The above scenarios assume the comments and statements made relate to the nature of the proceedings

________________________________________________________________________________________

RETRACTIONS OF DEFAMATORY STATEMENTS
MAY SERVE AS A MITIGATING FACTOR FOR THE DEFENDANT AND MAY
REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGES AWARDED TO THE PLAINTIFF

________________________________________________________________________________________

LIABILITY FOR REPUBLISHING
DEFAMATORY STATEMENTS

Generally, anyone who repeats or republishes someone else's statements is just as responsible for their defamatory content as the original speaker if they knew, or had reason to know, of the defamation.

Note:  Internet Service Providers (ISP's) have generally been granted immunity (per Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act) for most all forms of defamation that occur on websites hosted on their service.  The rationale for this is that it is impossible for an ISP to verify the truthfulness of every statement posted on a webpage or blog.  This is simply too cumbersome and unrealistic.  

______________________________________________________________________

THE LATEST RAGE: MEDIA LIABILITY INSURANCE

Many insurance companies are now offering media liability insurance policies designed to cover online libel claims that arises from distributors of information and communication over the internet.  Premiums can vary greatly.  Some homeowner's insurance policies provide protection against libel claims.  Major Insurers offering Media Liability Insurance Coverage

_____________________________________________________________________________

. NOT DEFAMATION - BUT STILL LEGALLY ACTIONABLE

(1) INVASION OF PRIVACY TORT - PLACING PLAINTIFF IN A "FALSE LIGHT"

The tort of "false light" (invasion of privacy) occurs where the publisher portrays something as being factual, but which in reality creates a false impression about the plaintiff.  For example, writing an autobiography about a person but attributing to the subject views or opinions the subject never actually held or entertained.

Note: False light claims are subject to the same constitutional protections discussed above.

(2) INVASION OF PRIVACY TORT - "PUBLICATION OF PRIVATE FACTS"

To establish a claim for the tort of Right to Privacy Public Disclosure of Private Facts, the Plaintiff must generally prove each of the following: (a) an intentional public disclosure, (b) of a private fact, (c) concerning the Plaintiff, (d) that is not of legitimate public concern, and (e) is highly objectionable to a reasonable person (i.e. to a juror).  For this tort, TRUTH IS NOT A DEFENSE!!!

The key is to prove the statement was highly offensive to a reasonable person.  This is a factual question for the jury to decide, assuming the case gets past summary judgment.

______________________________________________________________

 

Defaming Goods and Services of a Company: TRADE LIBEL

Trade libel is defamation against the goods or services of a company or business. For example, saying that you found a dead roach in a can of beans when such is not true.

if someone or another company is disparaging or tarnishing your goods, or services, or company brand or trademarks, let us know.  We can structure flat rate fees or low hourly rates depending upon the situation.  Don't let those with unscrupulous motives post digital defamation on websites, blogs, bulletin boards, in podcasts, and other digital online places.  Hire an attorney to put a stop to it.


_____________________________________________________________________


DEFAMATION RESOURCES 

MediaLaw Resource Center

Major Insurers offering Media Liability Insurance Coverage

__________________________________________________________________________________________

CALL

877-276-5084

IF YOUR BELIEVE YOU CORPORATE GOOD NAME OR PERSONAL REPUTATION IS BEING TARNISHED, DAMAGED, OR INJURED, CONTACT US FOR A FREE CONSULTATION

or visit The Law Offices of Steven C. Vondran on the web at www.VondranLaw.com

Fighting For YOU!

California: 620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1100 Newport Beach, CA 92660

Arizona: 2415 E. Camelback Road, Suite 700, Phoenix AZ 85016

Because most of our internet defamation law can be done, and is done, by phone fax and email between us and you we are able to serve our California clients in the following California Counties and Cities

Alameda
Albany
Berkeley
Dublin
Emeryville
Fremont
Hayward
Livermore
Newark
Oakland
Piedmont
Pleasanton
San Leandro
Union City
Amador
Amador City
Ione
Jackson
Plymouth
Sutter Creek
Chico
Gridley
Oroville
Paradise
Angels Camp
Colusa
Colusa
Williams
Antioch
Brentwood
Clayton
Concord
Danville
El Cerrito
Hercules
Lafayette
Martinez
Moraga
Orinda
Pinole
Pittsburg
Pleasant Hill
Richmond
San Pablo
San Ramon
Walnut Creek
Crescent City
Placerville
South Lake Tahoe
Clovis
Coalinga
Firebaugh
Fowler
Fresno
Huron
Kerman
Kingsburg
Mendota
Orange Cove
Parlier
Reedley
San Joaquin
Sanger
Selma
Orland
Willows
Humboldt
Arcata
Blue Lake
Eureka
Ferndale
Fortuna
Rio Dell
Trinidad
Imperial
Brawley
Calexico
Calipatria
El Centro
Holtville
Westmorland
Inyo
Bishop
Kern
Arvin
Bakersfield
California City
Delano
Kern County
Maricopa
McFarland
Ridgecrest
Shafter
Taft
Tehachapi
Wasco
Avenal
Corcoran
Hanford
Lemoore
Lake
Clearlake
Lakeport
Susanville
Los Angeles
Agoura Hills
Alhambra
Arcadia
Artesia
Azusa
Baldwin Park
Bell
Bell Gardens
Bellflower
Beverly Hills
Bradbury
Burbank
CalabasCarson
Cerritos
Claremont
Commerce
Compton
Covina
Cudahy
Culver City
Diamond Bar
Downey
Duarte
El Monte
El Segundo
Gardena
Glendale
Glendora
Hawaiian Gardens
Hawthorne
Hermosa Beach
Hidden Hills
Huntington Park
Industry
Inglewood
Irwindale
La Canada-Flintridge
La Habra Heights
La Mirada
La Puente
La Verne
Lakewood
Lancaster
Lawndale
Lomita
Long Beach
Lynwood
Malibu
Manhattan Beach
Maywood
Monrovia
Montebello
Monterey Park
Norwalk
Palmdale
Palos Verdes Estates
Paramount
Pasadena
Pico Rivera
Pomona
Rancho Palos Verdes
Redondo Beach
Rolling Hills
Rolling Hills Estates
Rosemead
San Dimas
San Fernando
San Gabriel
San Marino
Santa Clarita
Santa Fe Springs
Santa Monica
Sierra Madre
Signal Hill
South El Monte
South Gate
South Pasadena
Temple City
Torrance
Vernon
Walnut
West Covina
West Hollywood
Westlake Village
Whittier
Chowchilla
Madera
Marin
Belvedere
Corte Madera
Fairfax
Larkspur
Mill Valley
Novato
Ross
San Anselmo
San Rafael
Sausalito
Tiburon
Mariposa
Mendocino
Fort Bragg
Point Arena
Ukiah
Willits
Merced
Atwater
Dos Palos
Gustine
Livingston
Los Banos
Merced
Modoc
Alturas
Mono
Mammoth Lakes
Monterey
Carmel
Del Rey Oaks
Gonzales
Greenfield
King City
Marina
Monterey
Pacific Grove
Salinas
Sand City
Seaside
Soledad
Napa
American Canyon
Calistoga
Napa
St. Helena
Yountville
Nevada
Grass Valley
Nevada City
Truckee
Orange
Anaheim
Brea
Buena Park
Costa Mesa
Cypress
Dana Point
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Garden Grove
Huntington Beach
Irvine
La Habra
La Palma
Laguna Beach
Laguna Hills
Laguna Niguel
Lake Forest
Los Alamitos
Mission Viejo
Newport Beach
Orange
Placentia
San Clemente
San Juan Capistrano
Santa Ana
Seal Beach
Stanton
Tustin
Villa Park
Westminster
Yorba Linda
Placer
Auburn
Colfax
Lincoln
Loomis
Rocklin
Roseville
Plumas
Portola
Riverside
Banning
Beaumont
Blythe
Calimesa
Canyon Lake
Cathedral City
Coachella
Corona
Desert Hot Springs
Hemet
Indian Wells
Indio
La Quinta
Lake Elsinore
Moreno Valley
Murrieta
Norco
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Perris
Rancho Mirage
Riversi
San Jacinto
Temecula
Folsom
Galt
Isleton
Sacramento
San Benito
Hollister
San Juan Bautista
San Bernardino
Adelanto
Apple Valley
Barstow
Big Bear Lake
Chino
Chino Hills
Colton
Fontana
Grand Terrace
Hesperia
Highland
Loma Linda
Montclair
Needles
Ontario
Rancho Cucamonga
Redlands
Rialto
Twentynine Palms
Upland
Victorville
Yucaipa
Yucca Valley
San Diego
Carlsbad
Chula Vista
Coronado
Del Mar
El Cajon
Encinitas
Escondido
Imperial Beach
La Mesa
Lemon Grove
National City
Oceanside
Poway
San Marcos
Santee
Solana Beach
Vista
San Francisco
San Joaquin
Escalon
Lathrop
Lodi
Manteca
Ripon
Stockton
Tracy
Arroyo Grande
Atascadero
Grover Beach
Morro Bay
Paso Robles
Pismo Beach
San Luis Obispo
San Mateo
Atherton
Belmont
Brisbane
Burlingame
Colma
Daly City
East Palo Alto
Foster City
Half Moon Bay
Hillsborough
Menlo Park
Millbrae
Pacifica
Portola Valley
Redwood City
San Bruno
San Carlos
San Mateo
South San Francisco
Woodside
Santa Barbara
Buellton
Carpinteria
Guadalupe
Lompoc
Santa Barbara
Santa Maria
Solvang
Santa Clara
Campbell
Cupertino
Gilroy
Los Altos
Los Altos Hills
Los Gatos
Milpitas
Monte Sereno
Morgan Hill
Mountain View
Palo Alto
San Jose
Santa Clara
Saratoga
Sunnyvale
Santa Cruz
Capitola
Santa Cruz
Scotts Valley
Watsonville
Shasta
Anderson
Redding
Shasta Lak
Sierra
Loyalton
Siskiyou
Dorris
Dunsmuir
Etna
Fort Jones
Montague
Mount Shasta
Tulelake
Weed
Yreka
Solano
Benicia
Dixon
Fairfield
Rio Vista
Suisun City
Vacaville
Vallejo
Sonoma
Cloverdale
Cotati
Healdsburg
Petaluma
Rohnert Park
Santa Rosa
Sebastopol
Sonoma
Windsor
Stanislaus
Ceres
Hughson
Modesto
Newman
Oakdale
Patterson
Riverbank
Turlock
Waterford
Sutter
Live Oak
Yuba City
Tehama
Corning
Red Bluff
Tehama
Trinity
Tulare
Dinuba
Exeter
Farmersville
Lindsay
Porterville
Tulare
Tulare
Visalia
Woodlake
Tuolumne
Sonora
Ventura
Camarillo
Fillmore
MoorpaOjai
Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Santa Paula
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
Ventura
Yolo
Davis
West Sacramento
Winters
Woodland
Yuba
Marysville
Wheatland
 
 

 This is an advertisement and communication pursuant to State Bar Rules.  Legal Services Offered to California and Arizona Clients Only.


                                                                    

 This is an advertisement and communication pursuant to state bar rules.

Comments (1)

Anonymous
Jennifer Collins

My name is Jennifer Collins. I am the adult child in a much publicized child abuse, custody case.  My father abused us severely (including broken bones to my mother and a fractured skull to my brother.) The (Minnesota) family court found he was abusive, but couldn't understand my mother's fear of him still after 2 years of being divorced. The judge assumed that my mother must have mental health issues (even though all of the treating/evaluating therapists determined she only suffered from post traumatic stress disorder.)  The judge concluded that it was easier to monitor my father's physical abuse to us than the damage of having a ‘broken mother' and he reversed custody of me and my brother to our abusive father. 

After the custody reversal we were only allowed very limited supervised visitation with our mother so that she would not interfere in restoring our relationship with our father. During visitation I showed my mother (and the court supervisors) fresh welts and bruises on my back and bottom and told them "he's still hurting us."  The supervisor scolded me "you know you are not allowed to talk about those kinds of things anymore." During another visit when we told our mother (and the supervisors) of even more abuse they told us that if we ever say that our father is hurting us again will we not be able to see our mother anymore.  My brother was 11 and I was 9 so we started writing notes at our father's house and we would sneak them into our mother's pockets during visitation.  We begged her to come save us. 

We ran away from our father's house and we met our mother at a video store and fled the United States for New Zealand. We were apprehended in the Netherlands for inadequate travel documentation. We were held in refugee centers for 3 long years. We eventually won our case and were the first Americans to be granted asylum in the Netherlands.  We lived in secrecy for 12 years until we were recently found by the American authorities.  The central authorities tried to have my mother extradited back to the United States. The Dutch Ministries first asked for the American Federal Authorities to investigate whether or not we were abused by our father as we claimed.  The FBI concluded that we were abused and then the Dutch Ministries extended our asylum to "indefinite status."

I was determined to have my mother's name cleared and try to find a way to hold the court officials accountable for the court appointed child abuse we suffered after they were made aware of the abuse. I started a letter writing campaign. I sent out over 1000 emails to every (MN) state representative, every US Senator, federal commission I could think of and every domestic violence organization I could find. I was contacted by Marlene Kaufmann from the Helsinki Commission.  Ms. Kaufmann and Democratic Majority leader, Congressman Steny Hoyer have been a pivotal part in helping me find justice. All parental abduction charges against my mother have been dismissed. My mother refused to write a letter of apology to the local judge so she ended up pleading guilty to one count of contempt of court, but now she is a free woman!

I am studying psychology and I have become a domestic violence advocate. I have been invited to be a key speaker at several conferences around the United States. I have met with several congressmen in attempts to enforce child protection laws. I have interviewed with national television shows; Good Morning America, Prime Time, 20/20, Inside Edition, etc...  I was on a live talk show program, Mike and Julia with Geraldo Rivera speaking out against Parental Alienation Syndrome. Glenn Sacks, a very public father's rights columnist was advocating for PAS.  Mr. Sacks was quite offended with my appearance. Someone from his site said that I was a paid actress as part of some conspiracy against the father's rights movement.

Glenn Sacks sent out an article to his 50,000 followers asking them to investigate me and my family. Then he personally published several articles all over the place attacking my mother, and trying to discredit me. Mr. Sacks has consistently accused my mother of being an actual "kidnapper" even though all parental abduction charges against our mother were dismissed.

Glenn Sacks has crossed legal and ethical boundaries by his recent defamation of character attacks against me, my mother and my brothers.  He deliberately and maliciously tried to discredit me personally and professionally and ruin my reputation as a public speaker (against child abuse.) He and his followers are also trying to sabotage my organization CA3. Glenn Sacks has personally attacked my credibility and is trying to ruin my career as a child advocate.

Glenn Sacks articles are full of false accusations, misrepresentation of the evidence, publication of personal information, violations of sealed court records and blatant lies in his deliberate attempt to discredit us as abuse victims. Glenn Sacks has personally concluded that we were not abused by my father more specifically that my brother's fractured skull was not caused by my father's abuse. He has also stated in various articles that my mother was and is mentally ill, which every single treating psychological (past and present) has refuted. 

Glenn Sacks has sent his 50,000 followers on a witch hunt by requesting them to investigate the lives of a battered woman and her abused children. We were terrified by threatening mails and public posting of horrible insults, libelous accusations and intimidating threats. He has posted horrific details of rape and abuse in an obvious attempt to further humiliate the victims. This is clearly an invasion of privacy.  I would like to know if Mr. Sacks can be held responsible for the public threats on his site including to "gang rape" a rape survivor (my own mother.)  By his own admission, Glenn Sacks screens all comments before he personally posts them on his site. Can he be held for the content of those postings?

Glenn Sacks articles have been a deliberate attempt to defame us adult abused children and our battered mother. Mr. Sacks fails to mention supporting medical records, police reports, child abuse investigations and numerous witness testimonies. He ignores all of the supporting evidence, including a trial courts finding that the father, Mark Collins was found to have committed domestic violence. His defamation has impacted my career immensely. Several television programs have canceled or postponed the airing of my interviews. I have been advised that it is due to complications arising from Mr. Sacks ‘investigation and accusations.' This man is destroying my career and personal reputation!

Glenn Sacks articles have directly resulted in a clear defamation of character and personal injury to me, my mother (Holly Collins) and my brothers, Zachary and Christopher. (Please note that Christopher is only 15 and should have some protection from Glenn Sacks publications of his name and personal situation.)

Glenn Sacks must be held responsible for his malicious and damaging actions.  I was advised to find an attorney in California, since that is where Glenn Sacks resides and the defamation took place

Would you be willing to investigate this case and help repair the damage to my reputation?  My career helping children is at stake.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Collins

on behalf of myself and my family:

Jennifer Collins,

Zachary Collins

Christopher Collins

& Holly Collins

Feb 22, 2009 08:56 AM
#1