Laclede County MO stats for September 2008

By
Real Estate Broker/Owner with Debbie DiFonzo - United Country VIP Realty, SW Missouri

The Laclede County MO real estate market report for September 2008 includes: Lebanon MO, Phillipsburg MO, Conway MO, Stoutland MO and Sleeper MO.

Laclede County MO Real Estate Market Report - September 2008

Residential Property:

  • 23 Residential properties sold in Laclede County MO in September 2008
  • Average List Price: $163,201
  • Average Sold Price: $155,054
  • Average Days on the Market: 113
  • Least Expensive Property Sold: $45,000
  • Most Expensive Property Sold: $900,000
  • 8 pieces of property sold with 2 acres or more

Vacant Land:

  • There were ZERO vacant land parcels sold in Laclede County MO in September 2008 (per the Lebanon MLS)

Commercial Property:

  • 1 Commercial property sold in Laclede County MO in September 2008
  • Days on the Market: 67
  • Sales Price: $59,500

Residential property continues to sell well in the Laclede County (MO) area. Days on the market were less for September than they were in July 2008. (July 2008 DOM = 143)

I have to admit, I am a little shocked by the lack of movement in the Land sector. Land has retained it's value and remains a solid investment in this ever changing world. As the saying goes, "They aren't making any more of it!"

Trout at Bennett Spring State Park, Lebanon MO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*** Based on information from the Lebaon Board of REALTORS multi list system for the period of September 1st, 2008 through September 31, 2008. The LBOR does not guarantee this information nor does the LBOR claim responsibility for the accuracy of said information.

*** Please remember, this information is from the MLS and may not reflect all the sales recorded for the said time period. There may have been other real estate activity handled outside of the LBOR multi list system.

Posted by

Debbie DiFonzo on GoogleEmail Debbie DiFonzoConnect on FacebookDebbie DiFonzo on LinkedInFollow me on TwitterFlickr

Comments (6)

Laura Cerrano
Feng Shui Manhattan Long Island - Locust Valley, NY
Certified Feng Shui Expert, Speaker & Researcher

Deb, Do they have a lot of land parcels for sale?   I too am surprised, once gone it will be exactly that, GONE!

Oct 19, 2008 02:44 PM
Debbie DiFonzo
Debbie DiFonzo - United Country VIP Realty, SW Missouri - Lebanon, MO
Lebanon MO and Buffalo Missouri Real Estate

I just had to laugh, Carole - not sure why I added a picture of a trout vs a picture of a land track.

Laclede County Missouri has 35 parcels over 5 acres actively listed in the MLS. I'd say this is an all time low, but I did not confirm that. You sum it up well- one these pieces are gone, they cannot be brought back.

Oct 19, 2008 03:24 PM
Donna Mitchell- Middle Tennessee's Best Banker
Brentwood, TN

Wonder if the lack of land sales has anything to do with land being one of the types of property that is harder to get financing on?

Bank of America and Countrywide both had LOT loans a few months ago, and both companies, along with many others, have suspended lending for lots.

Vacant land loans have always been harder to come by apart from Farm Credit's speciality loans.

The difference between "vacant land" and a "lot" is the lot is in a subdivision's recorded plan with utilities available, road access, etc, while "vacant land" may not even have road access, etc.

Oct 19, 2008 05:38 PM
Don Rogers
Keller Williams Realty Chesterfield - O'Fallon, MO
Realtor, Broker, CDPE, GRI, OnullFallon MO & St Charles County MO homes

Deb,

One thing for sure is that you have some nice size fish and clear streams there in Lebanon.  The number of sales, is that a real slow down or just about normal?

Oct 19, 2008 11:53 PM
Debbie DiFonzo
Debbie DiFonzo - United Country VIP Realty, SW Missouri - Lebanon, MO
Lebanon MO and Buffalo Missouri Real Estate

Donna - Great clarification between "lot" and "vacant land." I think you are right - lending has tightened on land along with an increase in % down. I have to admit, I really don't understand that. Land is not going away and the value remains there. From a risk stand point, I would think it would be less on a bank. A house can burn down or be "trashed" - land remains rather stable; not too much can happen to a piece of land!

 

Don- Are area was very fortunate until August of this year. We did not see dramatic shifts in sales or sales prices until then. Now we are in line with the rest of the country, seeing double digit declines in sales.

Oct 20, 2008 03:18 AM
Donna Mitchell- Middle Tennessee's Best Banker
Brentwood, TN

Debbie,

Two main distinctions on the risk of vacant property vs. that with a home on it.  The first is the availablity of a buyer, should the collateral be foreclosed on.  As we can see in the current market, banks don't want to have an inventory of homes because they can't liquidate them for a profit in most cases after a foreclosure, and that is even more true for vacant land.   A lot or land with a home on it is much more likely to sell faster than a vacant lot or land where the buyer has to actually build a home on it.  The current market is a very good example of this since we can all see that new construction is pretty well dead on a relative scale compared to existing home sales.

Secondly, in the case of vacant land, it may not be acceptable for zoning laws, which can always change until built upon, and, in some cases, roads can't even be built to get to the property without a recorded easment in place....let alone right of way easments for utilities, phone and cable.  Lending is always about the risk of both the borrower and the property and the property is just important as the borrower...more so than ever now.  Banks have to stay "liquid" to stay in business, and no matter how valuable a property may be "some day", if it can't be liquidated for a profit immediately so the money can be used to lend to other clients once it is foreclosed on, it is bad news for a bank.  Again, today's marketplace is evidence of this.  Banks own a LOT of properties right now that will undoubtedly be very valuable in the future.  But if the banks don't have enough money to stay in business because they are not getting payments in on the loans they paid out for those properties, it doesn't help them.

It's all about liquidity and the less liquid the property, the less desireable it is as collateral.  The longer it might take to sell, the less desireable it is.  Just like equity for a homeowner...it doesn't really affect your "net worth" unless you sell it or borrow against it.  That is only wealth on paper until it is sold or a loan is closed taking cash out that you can use.

Oct 20, 2008 03:37 AM

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?