In our area, we have reasonable priced investment type properties that can provide positive cash flow each month. A growing trend in our market is for out of town investors to be interested in purchasing these properties. This is not surprising to me as I understand other areas of the country do not have similar priced properties.
The part that really surprises me is the number of homes that are purchased without the buyer seeing the property in person. It would seem like it is hard enough to buy a property and manage them when you are in the area of the property. It would seem to be an overwhelming prospect to try and do this if you have not personal been to the property.
I was just wondering what some other points of view are on this. Are buyers really so eager to buy a property that is reasonably priced compared to their local market that they will over look all of this? I personally own properties in an area other than my local area. I can say that I visited and viewed each of them before I purchased them. I wanted to be comfortable with the condition and how they would fit into my portfolio.
As an agent, I would be very worried about recommending that a client purchase a property without seeing it. My perception of the condition could be very different from the potential buyer. I would not want to say that a property is in good condition and have a client it buyer it. They come into town to see their new purchase and say to me, "What the heck were you thinking!"
I would really like to have some other opinions on this subject.
Comments(17)