67% of all statistics are made up on the fly.
It may actually be higher than that, since I just made that one up on the fly. You get the point. This morning, I read a report on MarketWatch that struck me as more than odd. It struck me as misleading. So, I decided to use my EyeJot This! bookmarklet and put out a little video message on Twitter.
What you see below is the instant conversation that took place. It's best to read it from the bottom of this post to the top. And it illustrates a couple of things for me.
First, the speed at which conversations can move in the social media space is incredible. This bulk of this took place in a span of about 30 minutes and as I'm typing this word, it's still going on. (My apologies to those who might be left out below. I'm writing this quickly to further illustrate the point.) The speedy reaction to the assertion that "67% of all agents are now members of social networks" was almost 100% negative.
Second, in this day and age, if you put out a press release making specific claims you need to be prepared to defend it. Vigorously. In this case, I merely questioned the real estate professionals who use social media the most, those on Twitter. I don't know if any of the execs at Quantum Digital are engaging the real estate community on Twitter, but if they are not, it may further illustrate just how far off the 67% number may really be. As Teri Lussier points out below, how they conducted the survey and how they defined "social network" play a large role in how they got to that number. (Just as my use of Twitter ONLY severly skews this conversation!) Neither of those pieces of information are included in the press release, so we're all left to guess. Leave a void and it will be filled. Guaranteed.
What should Real Estate Brokers be thinking right now?
If I don't write this post, the folks at Quantum Digital probably never see that conversation. So, Brokers, do you have any idea what conversations your real estate agents are having online? If not, you should. My bet is that a very high percentage of brokers are not actively engaged at all with the kinds of conversations, like this one, that are taking place almost every minute of every day in places like Twitter. And if the number really is as low as many state below, then, in part, the absence of a social media strategy at the broker level is to blame. That must change. Right now, the RE.net is talking to itself for the most part. And if social media is to provide the return it has the potential to provide, that also has to change.
Here's the conversation. Just the replies directed to me. Again, it's best to read it from the bottom up.
-
-
SteveBelt: @respres for my brokerage, it looks like it might be as high as 25% have a social network account...but less than 1% are using it actively5 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
KevinBoer: @respres I suspect their definition of "online social network" includes Realtor.com Then 67% makes sense. http://tinyurl.com/6nxfgy
-
acummings: @ResPres I don't know any other agents in my area here on Twitter. Few on FB and MS, a few on AR, that's about it that I've seen.14 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
mattwilkins: I think @respres opened the perverbial can of worms by uncovering the truth about the RE using social media/networking!14 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
Vingold: @ResPres unless we're counting something like ActiveRain as a social network - I would say here in MD the numbers are low low - 5% if that14 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
ChrisShouse: @ResPres I say only me in my office period and in the valley on Twitter I think John and I are most active agree@LVRealEstate16 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
wharriman: @ResPres I would second the other people here, 67% is WAY high. I can only think of a handful that are actively using... http://ff.im/1ce
-
wharriman: @ResPres I would second the other people here, 67% is WAY high. I can only think of a handful that are actively using SM in their biz.
-
BradCoy: @ResPres in my local market, it seems that their are maybe a handful of RE pros are *using* Social ntw. 'a part of' maybe 15%less than a minute ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
DaleChumbley: @ResPres When I teach @ my local office, less than 10% have MS, facebook, LinkedIn accounts. 67% is way high IMHO.
-
Twitterzilla: @respres that would probably be an interesting polldaddy to put on Active Rain. Ask what % is social in their office 1-5% 5-10% 10-15% etc.
-
mlbroadcast: @ResPres I am sooooo looking forward to that blog post
-
DaleChumbley: RE: 67% RE Online. Bunk! Besides me, I know less than 10 RE peeps on Twitter in all PDX/Vanc. area. http://www.eyejot.com/et?ResPres-5142233 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
mlbroadcast: @ResPres 1000 percent I agree jt
-
LVRealEstate: @ResPres In Las Vegas I think we're a lot closer to 6 to 7% than we are to 67%. Consistent users are probably less than 3%.5 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
2 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
EricaWallace: @ResPres cannot wait to see the blogpost on this!
-
joelrunner: @respres 10 or 15 out of 65 if you count having a facebook account that hardly gets used.
-
ResPres: @mattwilkins oh, you'll get credit. Be careful what you wish for.
-
mattwilkins: @ResPres as long as you give the twitterazzi credit as the inspiration :)
-
ResPres: @mlbroadcast I don't care what it is. Misleading information is dangerous, IMHO. I know you agree.
-
mlbroadcast: @respres it's exactly this type of traditional media bullcrap that is going to go the way of the T-Rex. SocNets will kill it eventually.
-
ResPres: Now that I know 67% of real estate profs can see it, I'm going to turn this Tweetfest into a blog post. Hope y'all don't mind. :)5 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
joelrunner: @respres I have 35 agents at my RE company and another 30 I consult for, and I can think of 5 (out of 65) who are active in social media.
-
mlbroadcast: @respres quantum sees no threat in that number, they know it's crap. that is a press release, not an article, its an Ad not editorial
-
PhoenixREGuy: @respres whoops, missed @terilussier's point. But it is at least a data point that great minds think alike ;)
-
Twitterzilla: @ResPres http://www.eyejot.com/et?ResPres-514223 Just looking around my office I would guestimate maybe 15% &I would think that is ambitious
-
jasoncrouch: @ResPres Actually, @LaniAR may be even closer with her estimate of 15%. Any time I mention this stuff, I get blank stares from agents.
-
ResPres: RT @LaniAR: @jasoncrouch aren't you nice? i would argue about 15% ( re: http://www.eyejot.com/et?ResPres-514223 )7 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
mattwilkins: @ResPres I agree with ya. if I had to guess at most 10% of the RE professionals in my local market are social netowork members
-
jasoncrouch: @ResPres I am in a tech-savvy town, and VERY few of the agents I know are members of ANY social network. This in inflated IMO - maybe 30%?
-
ResPres: @PhoenixREGuy Yep. I think that's the point @terilussier is making. Would be interesting to see how they collected their data.
-
ResPres: @mattwilkins I realize our conversation here is anecdotal, but I'm convinced the report is way off. http://www.eyejot.com/et?ResPres-514223
-
PhoenixREGuy: @respres - re 67%. Ask people via a blog post, and you'll get a high number. Walk into a brokerage and many will say "do I social what?"
-
mattwilkins: @ResPres I also think that's very high considering I'm the only member of a 1000+ member local REALTOR board that ACTIVELY uses the medium
-
ResPres: RT @Twitterzilla: @ResPres 67% belong to soc networks & the rest are still looking for the "any key" http://www.eyejot.com/et?ResPres-51422316 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
ResPres: @604homesguy I have Eyejot Pro account, which allows for your own branding. http://www.eyejot.com/et?ResPres-514223
-
jimreppond: @ResPres I guess if you consider email itself as an "online social network", then MAYBE 67% :-)18 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
SeattleCondo: @respres wonder if it included non-business social networking...&/or someone who just signed up at a few sites but don't ever participate19 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
Twitterzilla: @ResPres 67% belong to social networks & the rest are still looking for the "any key" http://www.eyejot.com/et?ResPres-514223
-
ResPres: @TeriLussier excellent point. How survey was conducted is critical. http://www.eyejot.com/et?ResPres-51422319 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
ResPres: @wilkeshe @Agentaudrey I certainly think you're right. But even on inactive use, I think 67% is high.
-
Agentaudrey: @ResPres I think 67% is very high. I invitied everyone to AR. Probably 25 signed up and 3 of us use it, and only 2 of us use it daily.22 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
wilkeshe: @respres the telling # would be active. There's a bunch of agents on AR in my area, about 7 actually post.
-
ResPres: @Twitterzilla LOL email use failure is one of the reasons I think the 67% number is misleading. http://www.eyejot.com/et?ResPres-514223
-
wilkeshe: @ResPres It'd be a stretch here. I'd say about 20% here. Some large companies auto-sign agents on facebook,etc, might account for some?
-
FreedomWeaver: @ResPres I definately think the 67% number is high also. I've been in RE for 13 years and I'm a lil tech savvy and i joined SNs > 2 yrs ago33 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
Twitterzilla: @ResPres Further, I did 1mailing thru quantum in my hood, card came to my house addressed to Ex, had never lived @address.Reputabl, reliabl?
-
Twitterzilla: @ResPres 95% of all agents have an email address, but how many of them actually check their email? Just sayin'.
-
DezDaniels: @ResPres sounds way off to me in my daily experience with agents... I would say they might have signed up but don't utilize at all 47%39 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
retechblog: @ResPres That eyejot video bar should get best innovative tool for 2008
-
PhoenixREGuy: @ResPres Really struggling with that 67% number. Even if that's just making a profile and never coming back, that seems way high. WAY
-
jeanettejoy: @ResPres Love eyejot! I think the 67% is high. Agents may be members of Facebook, Linkedin, or Twitter, but they don't participate.43 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
susieblackmon: @ResPres 67% is not only surprising, it is misleading.43 minutes ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
EricaWallace: @ResPres umm yeah that seems really really high! must be counting membership for sites like linked in but not active participants...
-
-
ManaTulberg: @ResPres I agree with you. Most sign up and never return. On AR there are many in my area that sign up and do nothing.about 1 hour ago · Reply · View Tweet
-
-
ResPres: Does anyone else find this 67% number surprising? http://www.eyejot.com/et?ResPres-514223about 1 hour ago · Reply · View Tweet



)


























Comments (55)Subscribe to CommentsComment