Why not use local title and escrow companies,
I've been listing REO's for a while now and one thing I still don't get. If my local escrow company will match the discounted price of the lender's preferred company, why not use a local company?
- Price would be the same to the seller.
- The local company has people that we have dealt with successfully before.
- Much quicker movement of paperwork, deposit checks, etc.
- Saves more money by not having to Fed-Ex paperwork overnight.
- Keeps the local economy alive.
Here's one scenario:
My last buyer lived in Santa Barbara,CA; was purchasing a property with cash in Santa Paula, CA; the asset management company was in Orange County, CA and the escrow company was in Long Beach, CA. My office is in Simi Valley, CA. The span from one end to the other is about 150 miles. I, to this day, have never met the buyer face to face; and I have never met the seller face to face.
If one piece of paper, or one document page is missing initials, it takes two days to fix. Now had I been able to use a local Simi Valley escrow and title company, I could stamp out those fires in an hour.
I currently have a REO listing where the asset manager is on the east coast, I'm on the west coast and the bank wants a title company in Glendale, CA which is about 50 miles from my office. The property, both agents, and the buyer are all in Simi Valley within literally blocks of one another, and in the same parking lot as an escrow company!
I'd really like to hear from some of the asset managers out there who might share their thoughts as to why the agents can't choose title and escrow as long as the costs are the same.
Rudy Detgen
Comments(8)