Does Your Water Come From A well? READ THIS!

By
Real Estate Agent with Real Estate Showcase Photography


Submit an Augmentation Plan - Or Lose Your Water!

waterfallLocal news station, KRDO reported that 64 households in Teller County's Deer Mountain Ranch and Lakemoor West have been informed by the state Division of Water Resources that they must file a 'water augmentation plan' with the state by January 15, or stop using their wells by January 20. If they fail to do so, they will face court action. An Augmentation Plan is one that outlines how and when the water used will be replaced so as not to deplete the source of water to a senior appropriator, (see 'What are water rights, anyway?' below).

Residents say this is the first they've heard of it, had no prior information, and no warning of the situation. They have also been required to buy meters to monitor their well water use, at a cost of about 100 dollars, plus plumber's fees. The subdivisions have no active Home Owners Association that could have informed residents.

A senior appropriator somewhere along the line, has "called" in his right to that water.

 

So, how does this happen?   The Beginners Guide To Augmentation Plans For Wells , states:

"If you are considering using wells to provide water for a lawn and garden, domestic animals, a subdivision, or some other project, you should be aware that in some areas of Colorado you may be unable to get a well permit without an Augmentation Plan."

The question then is, was an augmentation plan not provided when these subdivisions were first planned? And if not, why not? According to my research, it was in 1972 that the first Colorado law was passed allowing for water augmentation plans.

 

What are water rights, anyway?River

The Doctrine of Prior Appropriation, (aka the "Colorado Doctrine" of water law), defines water rights as such:

"The allocation of water rests upon the fundamental maxim "first in time, first in right." The first person to use water (called a "senior appropriator") acquires the right (called a "priority") to its future use as against later users (called "junior appropriators")."  So, in times of drought, a senior appropriator has first right to the water, even if it means the junior appropriator ends up with none.

 

It is important to note here that a well permit does NOT grant a water 'right':

From Western States Water Laws:

"By law, every new well in the state that diverts groundwater must have a well permit. Exempt Well Permits, however, can be obtained for wells that pump less than 15 gallons per minute. For these wells, the state will give well permits that are exempt from the priority system. In order to obtain a permit, a person must file an application for approval of a permit with the State Engineer. A permit must be obtained from the state engineer prior to any utilization of groundwater, but the permit does not constitute a water right to the groundwater. A ground water right can only be obtained through the formal application to a water court."

If you have a well producing more than 15 gallons per minute, and you want to obtain the 'right' to that water, your well must be 'adjudicated'.

"Water rights in Colorado are adjudicated by the district water courts. Colorado has a process of individual adjudications where each right is adjudicated as it is approved."

Which means, you aquire a right, (through the appropriate water court), whether senior or junior, to that water. This would not mean, however, that a junior right would be guaranteed should the senior right holder require that water.

Water rights are a very complicated, and as we've seen, far reaching issue in our state. There are MANY attorneys in Colorado and other western states who specialize in water rights law.

As we deal with the other consequences of drought in our region, it would be good to remember the potential for loss of use of our wells, and educate ourselves accordingly.

 

 For More information, contact:

Colorado Division of Water Resources

1313 Sherman St. Rm. 818

Denver, CO 80203

303-866-3581

http://water.state.co.us/

Debi's signature

 

 

 

 

All Photos taken by Debi Boucher, all rights reserved and may not be reproduced without express written permission. Prudential Professional REALTORS, ASP REALTOR, Woodland Park Real Estate, Woodland Park Colorado 80863 – Serving the City of Woodland Park, Teller County, Ute Pass, and Park County since 1997.

 

Comments (15)

Pat Whitehouse
RE/MAX 1st Olympic Lynchburg Va - Lynchburg, VA
Broker/Owner

Hi Debi-Thanks for the very thorough and well written info. Obviously I don't live in Colorado but if it can happen there it can happen here and I do have a well and there has been drought conditions here. I wanted to let you know  I haven't forgotten to comment on my W.W. post. Just waiting on a good friend and I left him the link. He is a great supporter and a wonderful friend. His W.W. is sweet. Take a look.

http://activerain.com/blogsview/831134/Wordless-Wednesday-Guess-what-I-had-Last-Night-Uhmm

Dec 11, 2008 01:47 AM
Debi Boucher
Real Estate Showcase Photography - Woodland Park, CO
"Realtor Showcase" - Real Estate Photography/Virtual Tours

Hi Pat, Thanks for commenting. Realtors in this area have been talking about the 'water police' for a long time...if you have a well over 15 GPM, you risk having to meter your water, or lose the use (for a period, anyway) completely. Most people take their water very much for granted. It's time we pay attention, for ourselves, and for our clients. Water law is extremely complicated, hence the specialization of so many water attorneys. We routinely refer our clients to tax people, and real estate attorneys as a part of our contracts, to protect themselves.  We should be referring them to water attorneys as well.

Something to think about....

Anyone in AR specializing in water law? Would love to hear from you!

Debi

Dec 11, 2008 02:41 AM
Anonymous
Matt Machado, Bernard Lyons Gaddis & Kahn

Happened across your article.  I am a water attorney.  When a subdivision is created since 1972, the developer is required to adjudicate an augmentation plan to cover the wells.  This is part of the subdivision approval process, and necessary to obtain well permits to drill and operate wells.  Something must have gone wrong with the aug plan, or, if there never was an aug plan for this subdivision, something must have gone wrong in the subdivision approval process.  Since the wells shouldn't have been permitted without an aug plan, probably a serious problem with an existing aug plan.  Possible exceptions:  lot owners in some older subdivisions (pre1972) or subdivisions with lots >35 acres may be entitled to exempt well permits, but probably not the case here.  Aug plans are very expensive in that area.  The inquiry as to water rights vs permits is somewhat of a red herring--whether the water right for the well has been adjudicated is not too important.  Bottom line is all non-exempt wells must be permitted and included in an aug plan, which is complicated and must be adjudicated in water court.     

Matt   

Dec 11, 2008 05:21 AM
#3
Debi Boucher
Real Estate Showcase Photography - Woodland Park, CO
"Realtor Showcase" - Real Estate Photography/Virtual Tours

Matt, Thank you so much for your input! I was hoping to hear from someone with more insight into this issue. I had the same thought re: the issues for those folks. Something went wrong. The aug plan should have already been in place. I'm curious...you say the aug plans are very expensive. How so? About how much would you estimate? And in your professional opinion, should these homeowners be contacting an attorney to investigate the issue? Or would it even matter- gotta do what you gotta do, sort of thing? I'm wondering if they have any recourse to being put in this position...

Debi

Dec 11, 2008 05:53 AM
Mary Douglas
United Country Ponderosa Realty, Red Feather Lakes, Colorado - Red Feather Lakes, CO
REALTOR, Red Feather Lakes, Colorado

Hi Debi and Matt - I am very interested in how this will be resolved. It doesn't seem like the homeowner's have had very much notice in the matter! If for no other reason, they might want to consider forming an HOA to deal with the water issue as a group, rather than individually.  We live in a mountain subdivision under an Augmentation Plan.  We have a well, that is only permitted for household use ( no outside irrigation ) and we send our meter reading annually to the HOA, who reports the Subdivision's water usage to ( I believe) the State Engineer's office.

I wrote about the new legislation requiring all unregistered wells to be registered within 60 days after a conveyance, http://activerain.com/blogsview/829120/New-Colorado-legislation-regarding-water-wells-So-you-have-an-unregistered-well-now-what-do-you-do  the research alone made my eyes glaze over!  Water law is indeed a very complicated matter.  Thank God for the Water Attorney's who understand it!  I would tell those homeowners to find one ASAP!!

Dec 14, 2008 04:45 AM
Tim Bradley
Contour Investment Properties - Jackson Hole, WY
Commercial Real Estate Expert in Jackson Hole, WY

Great post! Awareness of water rights is climbing rapidly, and communities without secure water rights will be in big trouble in any prolonged drought.

Dec 14, 2008 04:49 AM
Debi Boucher
Real Estate Showcase Photography - Woodland Park, CO
"Realtor Showcase" - Real Estate Photography/Virtual Tours

Tim, Thanks for stopping by. Glad you found it informative. It's true, I think the water issue is big, and getting bigger. Will become a major problem for a lot of folks.

Debi

Dec 14, 2008 05:05 AM
Debi Boucher
Real Estate Showcase Photography - Woodland Park, CO
"Realtor Showcase" - Real Estate Photography/Virtual Tours

Mary, thanks for the great comments. I agree, forming an HOA would be the first step, and contacting an attorney the second. If nothing else, it may buy them the time they need to get their ducks in a row.

Debi

Dec 14, 2008 05:13 AM
Sabrina Kelley
ERA Herman Group Real Estate - Woodland Park, CO
Woodland Park Colorado Mountain Homes and Land

Now if we could only get this post and all the wonderful comments and opinions into the hands of the residents who are affected by this issue. Many people who have not lived in rural areas before are unaware of where to turn when it comes to water issues.

Does anyone have any clue as to why they have been ordered to resolve the issue so quickly?

Dec 17, 2008 01:32 PM
Mary Strang
Viroqua, WI

Gee I have heard that the Western States have some very strange water right issues. Water is something we take for grant here in Wisconsin, we have an abundantsupply. After reading this I am going to appreciate my well and free use of it even more.

Dec 17, 2008 01:50 PM
Debi Boucher
Real Estate Showcase Photography - Woodland Park, CO
"Realtor Showcase" - Real Estate Photography/Virtual Tours

Sabrina, I don't know. Seems rather abrupt. I'm guessing that by now, the folks there have obtained legal counsel, and are on the right track. I would be interested to know how this plays out.

Debi

Dec 18, 2008 05:15 AM
Debi Boucher
Real Estate Showcase Photography - Woodland Park, CO
"Realtor Showcase" - Real Estate Photography/Virtual Tours

Mary, Yes, other parts of the country are more fortunate re: water abundance. I know that in the western states, beginning with Colorado in the old days, water has ALWAYS been an issue. Ranchers have been dealing with water rights here for over 100 years. Excerpt from Marc Reisner, written in 1979, explains a bit of the issue:

"California, despite its semi-arid climate, its 23,000,000 people, its huge industrial base, and its ten million irrigated acres, gets enough rainfall in the mountains and along the North Coast to allow nearly half of its water to run out to sea without having first been put to some purportedly beneficial use. What is more, nearly ail the rivers with their headwaters in California also empty into the sea in California, so all of their water belongs, in a legal sense, to the state. Colorado's rivers carry only slightly more than one-fifth the annual run-off of California's-the state is more and than many people realize-and they all cross into neighboring states which are mostly desert, so Colorado has to share a great deal of the water in its rivers with, them. The result is that Colorado, second only to California in the arid West in population, industry, and irrigated acreage, has available for its use just over one-tenth as much surface water. Between the demands of agriculture, population, industry, and environmentalists not to mention the potential explosion in energy development- there doesn't seem to be enough to go around".

Debi

 

Dec 18, 2008 05:27 AM
Anonymous
L. Scott Holmberg

Hi Debi,

Just a quick note about the Deer Mountain Ranch Conservation Association (DMRCA) and our augmentation plan.

I am the past president for several years of the Arabian Acres Property Owners Association which had a central water system. We moved to Deer Mountain Ranch and frankly I knew little about augmentation plans.

We had no active home owners association and few if any of the likeminded folks living in Deer Mountain Ranch saw a need for one. I read the protective covenants and said "that's nice" and filed them away and enjoyed our life until.....

We received a letter from District Court Water Division 2 in Pueblo advising us that our well permit required that we have a "Totalizing Flow Meter" installed and provide them a water meter reading. I knew I didn't have a metered well and didn't know of anyone else who did in Teller County. Sure enough I looked at my well permit and there it was. We are law abiding citizens who grew up in the West, so I bought a meter, they aren't cheap, and had it installed. A month later I sent a reading and assured them I would continue to as they required.  I was thanked for my act of compliance and we went on living the dream again. 

Very shortly thereafter, and approaching the Christmas holiday, I was sent another letter from Division 2, telling me to cease all use of my well use because we were not in compliance with our water augmentation plan.

As of now we have incorporated Conservation Association (Deer Mountain Ranch Conservation Association) called for in our covenants with three initial executives and have our first scheduled meeting for this month. We are diligently working with District 2, our water provider in our augmentation plan, and coming quickly up to speed very quickly on Colorado's water laws and learning more about augmentation plans than you'll ever want to know.  

It is a challenge but working together we a confident we will hammer out a working solution for all of the home owners of Deer Mountain Ranch. I would encourage all other home owners to pull your well permit and any augmentation plan attached to your covenants and read them in excruciating detail. I think you will find that almost ALL well permits in subdivisions will require a totalizing flow meter be installed.

I understand that the Water Division has a couple of hundred augmentation plans to work through and your subdivision may be next. Be prepared.

 

 

 

Jan 09, 2009 04:29 AM
#13
Anonymous
L. Scott Holmberg

Hi Debi,

Just a quick note about the Deer Mountain Ranch Conservation Association (DMRCA) and our augmentation plan.

I am the past president for several years of the Arabian Acres Property Owners Association which had a central water system. We moved to Deer Mountain Ranch and frankly I knew little about augmentation plans.

We had no active home owners association and few if any of the likeminded folks living in Deer Mountain Ranch saw a need for one. I read the protective covenants and said "that's nice" and filed them away and enjoyed our life until.....

We received a letter from District Court Water Division 2 in Pueblo advising us that our well permit required that we have a "Totalizing Flow Meter" installed and provide them a water meter reading. I knew I didn't have a metered well and didn't know of anyone else who did in Teller County. Sure enough I looked at my well permit and there it was. We are law abiding citizens who grew up in the West, so I bought a meter, they aren't cheap, and had it installed. A month later I sent a reading and assured them I would continue to as they required.  I was thanked for my act of compliance and we went on living the dream again. 

Very shortly thereafter, and approaching the Christmas holiday, I was sent another letter from Division 2, telling me to cease all use of my well use because we were not in compliance with our water augmentation plan.

As of now we have incorporated Conservation Association (Deer Mountain Ranch Conservation Association) called for in our covenants with three initial executives and have our first scheduled meeting for this month. We are diligently working with District 2, our water provider in our augmentation plan, and coming quickly up to speed very quickly on Colorado's water laws and learning more about augmentation plans than you'll ever want to know.  

It is a challenge but working together we a confident we will hammer out a working solution for all of the home owners of Deer Mountain Ranch. I would encourage all other home owners to pull your well permit and any augmentation plan attached to your covenants and read them in excruciating detail. I think you will find that almost ALL well permits in subdivisions will require a totalizing flow meter be installed.

I understand that the Water Division has a couple of hundred augmentation plans to work through and your subdivision may be next. Be prepared.

 

 

 

Jan 09, 2009 04:29 AM
#14
Debi Boucher
Real Estate Showcase Photography - Woodland Park, CO
"Realtor Showcase" - Real Estate Photography/Virtual Tours

Scott, Your story is a sobering, and almost frightening one. Out of curiosity, what is your well's GPM? As a Realtor, we have heard for years about homeowners in our area with wells over 15 GMP perhaps having to deal with the 'well police' one day. Apparently that day has arrived. It is my hope that everyone becomes aware of the situation, and begins work to comply BEFORE they find themselves in eminent danger of losing, even temporarily, their water supply.

I sincerely appreciate you sharing your story.

Debi Boucher

Jan 11, 2009 05:34 AM

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?