Admin

Does Brand Matter?

By
Real Estate Broker/Owner with Achieve Realty, Inc.

Recently, RE/MAX International ran a print ad called, "Brand Matters." The phrase "Brand matters" appears three times throughout the sparsely worded centerfold ad of the October Real Estate Professional Magazine. Apparently, the ad is trying to sell the idea that "brand matters." After I read the phrase for the third time, I thought, "does brand really matter?"

RE/MAX is a great franchise. (I used to be a franchisee.) There are other great franchises, too. Coldwell Banker, Prudential, Keller Williams and Century 21 are some examples.

Pittsburgh has a few other brands that aren't franchises, including Howard Hanna Real Estate, Northwood Realty and Achieve Realty (my company).

These are all great brands.

However, none of these brands sell real estate. Not one. Do you know who sells real estate? Real estate licensees do. That's it. Nobody else.

Consumers don't drive down the street and say, "there's a Howard Hanna listing - it must be special!" Consumers don't care about the brand name on the sign.

If you ask a typical real estate licensee where their business comes from, they'll answer, "it comes from my sphere of influence ie. family, friends, repeat customers, word-of-mouth customers." They never say, "I got a customer who saw the RE/MAX Long Drive Championship and called RE/MAX International who referred the caller to me."

My point is that the only brand that matters is [insert your name here].

Let me give you another example: in the Northern Pittsburgh suburbs, where I concentrate, you can name the top agents without using their last names and everybody knows who they are: Kevin, Linda, Carol, Arlene, Judi. In my neighborhood, the name is "Mary Ann." THAT'S branding!!!

The typical consumer knows these names and recognizes them as a brand that is separate and distinct from their brokers' brands. In other words, as a friend of mine - who is the CFO of a large Cranberry-based company - recently asked me, "who does Kevin work for?" My response was, "EXACTLY!"

The interesting thing is that RE/MAX International essentially taxes their agents to promote their brand nationally and internationally. RE/MAX Agents must pay a monthly amount to support the National Ad Fund. This is not a voluntary contribution. Their ad suggests that this involuntary contribution is the "one reason" why their agents are "so much more successful than others in the industry

RE/MAX International believes that RE/MAX agents benefit by virtue of the national and international branding. I disagree.

In my opinion, if agents spend money promoting anything other than themselves as a brand, they're wasting their money.

Show All Comments Sort:
Randy Barnes
Atlanta, GA

I tend to agree about the brand being moot. It's still a personal relationship business, even with all the internet, web 2.0 etc.  As a RE/MAX fan and former agent I'm glad to see you spell it correctly. It is simply wrong to spell it Re/Max which is how I see many RE/MAX agents spell the name.  Not too aware of their own brand sometimes.

Jan 03, 2009 02:54 PM
Bob & Carolin Benjamin
Benjamin Realty LLC - Gold Canyon, AZ
East Phoenix Arizona Homes

Agree the brand things means nothing in the market now -- it comes down to the individual agent.

Jan 03, 2009 02:58 PM
Lawton Stokes
Achieve Realty, Inc. - Pittsburgh, PA

Hi Randy:

I've seen many agents put their stock in internet leads. Especially during these difficult times, NOTHING substitutes for the personal relationship. My agents who are keeping in touch with their "sphere" on a personal level (ex. phone calls, notes, visits) continue to thrive.

As a former RE/MAX owner, I'm "in the know." I have great admiration for RE/MAX.

Jan 03, 2009 03:00 PM
Loreena and Michael Yeo
3:16 team REALTY ~ Locally-owned Prosper TX Real Estate Co. - Prosper, TX
Real Estate Agents

I've heard that "Signs dont sell real estate, people (ie agents) do!". And I love that.

I guess if I paid a hefty franchise fee, then BRAND better matter to my bottom line. Otherwise it would defect its purpose of giving back a good chunk of my hard earned money.

But then again, I spoke to a couple of ReMax agents who are determined that ReMax gives them some lead/ prospects advantages - which I totally agree, an in-house attorney to ask question, but I'm not sure if I could honestly justify the costs.

This is a people business. It doesnt matter if I was Keller Williams, or 3:16 team REALTY (mine!), but the values of the business should shine. That's how we get referrals.

Jan 03, 2009 03:05 PM
Denise Gray
Realty World Alliance - Wichita, KS
Realtor SRES, Wichita Kansas Homes

I have no problems with RE/MAX but I think the only one it matters to is RE/MAX

Jan 03, 2009 03:51 PM
Fred Pickard
Fred Pickard Innovations Realty Inc - Hershey, PA
Hershey, PA

All of the franchise companies collect some kind of ad fee from agents, either on a monthly basis or per transaction (like the % off the agent's side that Realogy brands collect). It's just called somethng else.

Some people function better in a structured environment, like a brand, and some people function better working within their own parameters.

After working twice in the "branded" environment, I found out I was more comfortable working by myself.

Jan 03, 2009 09:45 PM
Lawton Stokes
Achieve Realty, Inc. - Pittsburgh, PA

Loreena: I agree with you completely.

Denise: You have to admit: RE/MAX has a brilliant idea: tell everyone you're the best and you're probably going to attract some darn good agents. And they have . . .

Fred: was there something about the branded firms that you didn't like? Was there something particular to the "structured environment" that bothered you? Enquiring minds want to know!

Thanks for all your comments!

Jan 04, 2009 10:19 AM
Fred Pickard
Fred Pickard Innovations Realty Inc - Hershey, PA
Hershey, PA

Lawton

I worked in the corporate world from age 23 to age 50. In the corporate world, if you didn't conform to the expectations ( how you dressed, how you spoke, eyc.) it was hard to get ahead. I used to refer to myself as a "corporate clown" sometimes because I did whatever was necessary to get that raise or new position. I remember back in the day that if you worked for IBM or P&G you had better be wearing a dark suit, white shirt and conservative tie, or else.

Entering the real estate brokerage world, I noticed that some of the corporate philosophy in regards to conforming to management expectations was there also. Meeting became "mandatory", voluntary desk time became "mandatory", suggestions for improvement became "complaining".

I worked at a Re/Max for about three years and was the top producer in that office the last two but I never liked the feeling of the ownership that everyone was expendable. It seemed to be about money. There was always the "why didn't you use our preferred lender" type of questions on every deal I turned in.

On my own for about 6 years, I work mostly from home (although I have an office), dress as I please and probably work more hours than ever. I love working this way.

 

Jan 04, 2009 10:43 PM
Lawton Stokes
Achieve Realty, Inc. - Pittsburgh, PA

Fred: It seems like you are tired of working for the proverbial "man." Your first real estate firm had a structural feel not unlike IBM - too hot. So you went another direction and tried RE/MAX - too cold. Now you're on your own - just right. My firm, Achieve Realty in Pittsburgh is "just right," too. it's too bad we don't work in the same town. I could have relieved you of your administrative burdens, provided legal free legal counsel, and you still would have made a great commission. 

Feb 15, 2009 01:05 PM