Special offer

The newest Property Bailout - Will this really help?

By
Real Estate Agent with Prudential Northeast Properties

Last week, it was announced that Maine would be receiving a 19.6 million dollar portion of a $4 billion dollar federal foreclosure bailout/neighborhood stabilization package.

According to a release in Mainebiz ( http://www.mainebiz.biz/news44028.html ), most of the money would be going to Lewiston-Auburn, Sanford, and Portland.

This package allows local governments to directly buy up distressed homes, rehabilitate them, and, as the article alludes, sell them to families that may not otherwise be able to afford homes, through responsible, low-cost loans and homeownership counseling. 

However, looking more closeley at the actual plan, it looks like a majority of the homes that are purchased by the state will not be rehabilitated for the purpose of selling, but rather for rental purposes, with an emphasis on housing the severely low-income population. 

Specifically, $5,000,000 of the funding for would go toward housing individuals or families whose incomes do not exceed 50% of area median income (that would be less than $25,000 or $30,000, depending on the area in Maine), and would be essentialy to create and administer rental housing.  The following was copied and pasted from the plan, viewable at the link below:(http://www.meocd.org/forms/Maine%20NSP%20Substantial%20Amendment%20Final.pdf)

The state will "Issue an RFP for the Regional Homeless Council housing development program. This program will provide grant money for the acquisition and rehabilitation of foreclosed upon properties to develop permanent housing for people that are homeless... In addition to the $5,000,000 set aside for the MaineHousing activities above there is a strong possibility that additional housing units purchased and rehabilitated with NSP funds will be occupied by individuals or families whose incomes do not exceed 50% of area median income."

Should foreclosed properties be bought by the state, rehabbed and used to house the homeless? Will this help or hurt our communities and property values? Would we be better off letting the private sector buy and redevelop these properties? 

I am torn here.  I belive on a moral/humane level that helping the homeless is a good idea, but I'm not sold on the idea that this is the kind of economic stimulus we need - the kind that will increase home sales, stabilize housing values, and help pull up the housing industry and with it the rest of the economy. I would LOVE some input from other Realtors (good or bad) as to how this money is being used in their states!

 

Stephen D White, E-Pro, ABR Cape Cod Real Estate
SDW Realty of Cape Cod - Falmouth, MA

Michelle I see that you graduated from Falmouth high in 2001. What are you doing up there in Maine with the Maniacs? ever done any real estate biz on the Cape?

Jan 21, 2009 03:56 AM
Margaret Woda
Long & Foster Real Estate, Inc. - Crofton, MD
Maryland Real Estate & Military Relocation

Goodness, that would be a conflict for me, too.  Lenn's comment is right on, though, not enough money to do too much damage.

Jan 21, 2009 04:50 AM
Randy Hooker
Dreamcatcher Realty / Greater Phoenix Area - Gilbert, AZ
Gilbert, Chandler, Mesa, Queen Creek

I'm not torn at all, Michelle!  I have absolutely ZERO confidence in any state or federal agency be able to be fiscally responsible enough to 'manage' those funds and effectively not waste them.  It basically just sounds like more Section 8 in the making, and I do NOT see that as helping anybody or anything related to our current financial predicament.  Nice post!   :)

Randy Hooker

Jan 21, 2009 05:09 AM
Donna Shuman
Florida Wholesale Realty Corp - Oviedo, FL
REALTOR - Marketing for Richard Shuman - www.SKIPtheBULL.com

I'm torn.

While I'll agree that many states are in desperate need of money, where does it end? What stipulations are being placed on these bailouts? Will we end up right back where we started a few years from now? I can foresee people becoming more and more disgruntled with the government if we continue to bailout corporations who've made poor business decisions but leave the people that were employed by them to fend for themselves. On the other hand, if we don't help the failing companies and governments, we will be in worse shape than we are now and nobody wants that!

What to do, what to do?

Jan 21, 2009 05:22 AM
Karen Turney
Homesmart - Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix Real Estate

It would be nice if the money cleared up all our problems wouldn't it?  But the truth is that when a city looks at the funds they think in broader terms.  Cities like Phoenix will fix up homes in specific areas, and yes, rent them out or offer them with great funding.  The goal is to help the market and more so to minimize the crime rates from unattended homes.  .

Jan 21, 2009 05:23 AM
Chris Olsen
Olsen Ziegler Realty - Cleveland, OH
Broker Owner Cleveland Ohio Real Estate

I think that anything that is done, if far too little and far too late, like putting a bandaid on the Titanic!  Land banks are catching on in places like Flint, Michigan -- which has been a huge success for an economically ravaged town like that.

Jan 21, 2009 06:10 AM
Scott Baker
www.eHomeReports.com Coldwell Banker Realty - Liberty Township, OH
Realtor Homes for Sale Cincinnati/Dayton Ohio

Special Money for Special People simply does not make sense. IMHO you have folks making "Housing" decisions that do not know and understand the Housing Market. Politicians. What a HUGE waste of money, and it really is a shame. Somebody should be held accountable at Fannie Mae, etc. 

Jan 21, 2009 09:06 AM
TIM MONCRIEF
Tim Monciref - Austin, TX
Over 2,000 homes sold…..

Money begets money.  The key is to get money churning in the market as fast as possible.  Even if the target is not ideal, as long as money is moving, the economy receives a benefit.  Is it enough?  Time will tell.  What is right or wrong as to where the money is going is not as important as the timing.  What would be wrong is to start a massive road project, which, on paper sounds like the right thing to do.  The reality is that it would take about 2 years to organize such and effort and a couple of years to complete.  We do not have that amount of time.  We need to talk in weeks and a few months, not years.

In the end, it will be capitalism that saves the day for all of us.  We will all see major reorganizations and major acquisitions that will have far superior affects.  But that wont win over in government.

Jan 21, 2009 09:06 AM
Cameron Wilson
Labrum Real Estate - Murrieta, CA
The Short Guy - Murrieta,Temecula,Menifee Californ

That is not a large amount of money so why not give it a try. The main thing is to bring accountability for the funds. We already help lower income people purchase homes through grant programs so might as well give this a chance.

Jan 21, 2009 11:04 AM
Charles Stallions
Charles Stallions Real Estate Services - Pensacola, FL
850-476-4494 - Pensacola, Pace or Gulf Breeze, Fl.

I got mad at a Realtor one time for telling me that some people just don't need to be homeowners, but now in this market I see exactly what he meant. There are just too many freebies in America and it is off the working backs of the few.

Jan 21, 2009 11:11 AM
John Kim
Property Services & Short Sale TC - Irvine, CA

     I agree with Charles on this.  I know too many and see too much in terms of people needing help but almost all of the people that need help that I have seen did not put any money down.  And the ones that did put down 20% or more and are asking for help I feel bad for.  The banks are telling me that they are not in need of help seeing that they are not delinquent or they give the stall tactic and then a denial.

     Let his economy take its hit and try not to delay the inevitable with monetary patches from the government.  Long term benefits not short term will help us get back on our feet.

Jan 21, 2009 11:45 AM
Roland Woodworth
Blue Cord Realty - Clarksville, TN
Blue Cord Realty

If this is anything like BOA.. they are gettin money and using it to buy other banks... or did I misunderstand something

Jan 21, 2009 01:45 PM
Mike Henderson
Your complete source for buying HUD homes - Littleton, CO
HUD Home Hub - 303-949-5848

It's an interesting dilema from a public policy angle.  I'm not sure of the idea is a good thing being a Realtor and an Investor.

Jan 21, 2009 03:51 PM
Nicole Lahti
United Lending - Austin, TX
Austin Texas Mortgage

I don't really have a problem with helping lower income people find housing, especially if there is a plan to eventually get them off housing.

I'm just a little uneasy about propping up housing values. As much as it would hurt my business for values to continue to fall, a part of me feels like this has to happen to come out of the bubble we've experienced.

I'm not stuck on total free-market economics, but I don't feel maintaining values that perhaps aren't realistic is healthy for the economy in the long-term.

Great post -- thanks for sharing!

Jan 22, 2009 02:36 AM
Christina Jackson
Signature Mortgage - Chicago, IL

I don't have an answer, but I do have a comment.  First of all, the homeless were homeless before this crisis, so why wasn't this intervention implemented before the housing crisis?  Secondly, what about the people who actually lost their homes, aren't the considered "homeless" too?  I have nothing against helping the homeless so if this is a way to provide them with a place,  then do so...I just don't know if thisis actually helping with the problem of foreclosure s a whole. 

Jan 22, 2009 05:33 AM
Anonymous
Anonymous

This is one of the worst ideas I've heard yet.  Millions of dollars are given on a yearly basis to state and local governments to help low income and homeless citizens.  And those programs are not being utilized for their intended purposes.  Homeownership is about building personal and familial wealth and while everyone should have the opportunity, the most important thing is to house the people who are victims of the current foreclosure crisis.  This particular "solution" does not even begin to address the problem facing homeowners with upside down mortgages, which will be the next batch of homeless.  Since everyone's home values are tied to each other, this is not a solution at all.

Jan 22, 2009 06:24 AM
#19
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Michelle,

If these homes are purchased for the purpose of rentals, then it seems the original mission of the program is being tossed aside. Will rentals stabilize an otherwise solid neighborhood?

Jan 22, 2009 08:56 AM
Patricia Aulson
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOME SERVICES Verani Realty NH Real Estate - Exeter, NH
Realtor - Portsmouth NH Homes-Hampton NH Homes

If only we had a crystal ball!  Who knows, we'll have to wait and see what happens. No sure I agree about the renting aspect .

 

Patricia Aulson/   Portsmouth NH Real Estate

Jan 23, 2009 08:45 AM
Randy Hooker
Dreamcatcher Realty / Greater Phoenix Area - Gilbert, AZ
Gilbert, Chandler, Mesa, Queen Creek

To Patricia, I wanted to tell you that I drilled 3 holes in my crystal ball and now use it for a balling ball.   :)

Randy Hooker

Jan 23, 2009 08:55 AM
Anonymous
tari

Invaluable analysis - Just to add my thoughts , if your business is wanting a AF 1800 , my business filled out and faxed a blank version here http://goo.gl/3yjFsC

Mar 02, 2016 10:11 AM
#23