Someone Has to Pay

Reblogger Lane Bailey
Real Estate Agent with Century 21 Results Realty GA RE Lic # 282060

Tim did a magnificent job explaining the situation the housing market is in, and why simple interference from the government isn't going to easily fix the problem...

Original content by Tim Maitski GREC #208281

The bursting of the housing bubble has created huge losses in wealth.  Many are now upside down on their home and feel trapped without any good solutions. 

A popular line in one of my kid's favorite movies, National Treasure, is "Someone has to go to jail".

When asset bubbles are burst, "Someone has to pay".  It's even more of a cold, hard reality because there is no one who can simply sign a pardon and get rid of all the losses. The losses are real and aren't going away by executive order.

The big question is, who pays?

In the free market usually the parties who freely entered into a contract with each other assume all of the risks along with all of the rewards.  People take out mortgages to buy homes, many with the hopes that they will be able to eventually sell for a higher price and make a nice profit.  What a great deal.  Instead of throwing their money away in rent payments, they become owners and make mortgage payments instead.  If they get 100% financing, it looks like a complete no-brainer decision.  Just by living in a home, one can become wealthy.  Many people did. Many people envied the home owners who made hundreds of thousands of dollars just by being an owner instead of a renter. 

But with opportunities for rewards, come the risks of being an owner.  Sure, many people ignored the risks of home prices actually going down.  Most thought that that was an impossible scenario.

Now many people owe $300,000 on a home that they might be able to sell for only $200,000.  They're in a real bind if they have to sell right now.  I feel for them.  It really stinks to be in that situation.

People are looking for solutions to get people out of this unfortunate situation.  Unfortunately, someone has to pay.

Some people seem to think that the government or banks should bail the homeowner out.  

  • Either by  giving them the $100,000 to cover them for their negative equity so that they can now sell at the market price of $200,000, or
  • they want the banks to reduce their mortgages down to $200,000.
  • A third alternative would be to give the potential home buyer an extra $100,000 so that they can pay the seller the full amount, $300,000, in order to pay off the mortgage.  This would keep homes prices at bubble prices and we can just make believe that nothing ever happened.

Any one of these sounds wonderful at first glance. But step back and figure out where the money is coming from.  If the government gives out money, they have to get it from somewhere.  Government doesn't create any wealth or real money. 

  1. It can only take it from one group and give it to another. So it can collect taxes from the many and give it to the fewer homeowners in trouble.
  2. It can borrow money which places the burden of repayment, with interest, on to the next generation. 
  3. It can just print more fiat money which then eventually devalues all of the current dollars in circulation.  This is basically just another form a taxation but it's more invisible and harder for people to pinpoint the blame.

    One way or another, someone has to pay.

Forcing the bankers to forgive the $100,000 usually sounds good to many people.  But follow that through and see who really takes the hit.  All of those mortgages were packaged into securities that were bought by investors.  Many of the investors were people like you and me who were just trying to make a little interest off the money that they worked so hard to save.  Many have retirement accounts that have funds that  invested in these "safe" bonds.  So if you require the banks to reduce the mortgage amounts, then all of these securities get reduced accordingly and anyone with any exposure to these securities takes the losses.  

The next thing you would need then is to have the government step in to guarantee all of these mortgage securities.  With what money?  See the paragragh above about how government gets their money.

I'm sorry to say that there just isn't any clean and easy solution to this mess. 

I have confidence that when government steps aside, the true free market process is the most efficient mechanism to get things where they need to be. 

Government has it's role, but not as the entity that decides the winners or the losers or the one who tries to spread the losses around.  Their role is to prosecute fraud and to provide transparency in the markets so that people can make the best informed decisions. 

Doing nothing sounds so lame and unresponsive.  But many times doing something just for the sake of trying to look helpful, actually worsens the situation and prolongs the agony.

The sooner the losses are taken, the sooner we can get back to some sanity.  


This entry hasn't been re-blogged:

Re-Blogged By Re-Blogged At

Post a Comment
Spam prevention
Spam prevention
Show All Comments
Terry & Bonnie Westbrook
Westbrook Realty Broker-Owner - Grand Rapids, MI
Westbrook Realty - Grand Rapids Forest Hills MI Re

We will be paying for the losses for a long time I hope the recovery will bring back jobs so more people can help with the repayment.

Jan 30, 2009 04:15 AM #1
Brian Burke
Kenna Real Estate - Englewood, CO
Broker & Advising Expert-Denver Luxury Real Estate

Hmm, I had missed this post by Tim earlier. Very well said indeed. ~Rita

Jan 30, 2009 05:13 AM #2
DeWayne Davis
Solid Source Realty of GA - Suwanee - Suwanee, GA
Suwanee Real Estate Agent

Lane you are right.  Tim hit the nail squarely on the head with a great big hammer that no one wants to talk about "someone has to pay," and unfortunately for many people, that someone really should be those people who freely entered into a contract to purchase a home that they couldn't really afford with loans that they probably shouldn't have received.  So many government officials, President Obama included, keep talking about this new age of "responsibility" but unfortunately they are trying to shift the responsibility away from many of the individuals who should bear the cost and should take the loss. 

I've made some really bad decisions in my life and lost an awful lot of money in the process, but no one has ever offered to bail me out for my mistakes.  Some of my worst financial mistakes were made because someone (many who were not the most upstanding individuals in society) convinced me against my better judgement to take action and invest in their product or service.  Why shouldn't those people be made to pay me back for my losses? -- Because I'm the one who was ultimately responsible for putting my money on the line.

I don't have the answers but one thing I do know as an absolute fact is that the government (any government) is not the best entity for managing and investing money.   The main reason the government never has and never will manage money well is because it is never the government's money and so the level of actual effort and genuiue interest is never equal to the task.

Jan 30, 2009 05:37 AM #3
Lane Bailey
Century 21 Results Realty - Suwanee, GA
Realtor & Car Guy

Terry - I just don't see there EVER being enough growth to pay off this spending binge.

Rita - He did quite well. 

DeWayne - They have way more fun spending it to stay in power...

Jan 30, 2009 11:35 AM #4
Post a Comment
Spam prevention
Show All Comments

What's the reason you're reporting this blog entry?

Are you sure you want to report this blog entry as spam?


Lane Bailey

Realtor & Car Guy
Ask me a question
Spam prevention

Additional Information