Admin

FORECLOSURE CRISIS NEEDS PRIVATE-PUBLIC PROGRAMS

By
Services for Real Estate Pros with S.P.O.C.H. a 501c3 Charitable NP

FORECLOSURE CRISIS NEEDS PRIVATE-PUBLIC PROGRAMS

By David M. Petrovich

For hundreds of thousands of homeowners across the United States it is increasingly difficult to believe in the guarantees of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" as the American Dream of homeownership evaporates along with jobs, retirement savings, college funds, and home equity.  It will require new models of private-public partnerships to reverse the foreclosure crisis that has spread from sea to shining sea.

"We the People" are desperate for help.  It is a priority to create realistic programs to stabilize the residential mortgage market and reduce the rising tide of foreclosures throughout the nation.  At the end of 2008, almost ten percent of all mortgages in the United States were either delinquent or in foreclosure, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.  These are ominous signs for real estate values across our state.  As homeownership rates plunge and equity evaporates, we all suffer the negative effects on our quality of life. 

As the magnitude of the foreclosure tsunami grew, the federal and state governments adopted programs encouraging lenders to modify troubled loans.  These efforts failed miserably as they did not stop the free fall in home values, keep owners in their homes, or stop the plunging equity markets.  Even with loan modification relief, many borrowers are suffering severe financial hardship due to job loss and still cannot afford the payment. 

Industry statistics indicate that within 6 months, fifty percent of all loan modifications fail to prevent foreclosure.  The relief offered by lenders to borrowers in distress is little more than Band-Aid relief instead of what's really needed: reconstructive surgery to remove and replace their loan's toxic terms with terms commensurate with the borrower's ability to repay and proportionate to the home's current true value.

The federal government can't solve this crisis on it's own.  Last September's TARP giveaway of $350 billion to both healthy and troubled banks did nothing to stop the dual downward spiral of foreclosures and consumer confidence (other than provide funds for exorbitant year-end bonuses for bankers).  President Obama and the Congress now have a rare second chance to do this right. 

Economic history shows that success in ending this crisis will come only from a new public-private partnership.  The nonprofit sector has long been the source of success to help achieve national priorities.  Today, nonprofit housing and mortgage counseling groups have the technical financial experience, entrepreneurial approach, market sophistication, and on-the-ground relationships to make quick progress in reversing the current grave trend in foreclosures.

As an example, the Society for the Preservation of Continued Homeownership (SPOCH), a New Jersey nonprofit for which I serve as the Executive Director, has the capacity, experience, and passion to keep people in their homes, stabilize market values, and improve the likelihood of success of the TARP II legislation.

Currently most loan modifications don't go far enough to restore sustained affordability for owners who are at risk of job loss, rising utility and food prices, and uninsured medical bills.  If mortgage holders refuse to grant meaningful loan relief, let's replace them with efficient, nonprofit organizations whose corporate objective is to preserve continued homeownership and work for the best interests of the owners.

How?  Pay 'em off and buy 'em out.  Instead of spending taxpayer dollars to fund the purchase of corporate jets or luxurious retreats (never to be repaid) let's put the dollars to work serving the needs of our economy and ensuring that taxpayers continue to believe in the great American dream of homeownership.  To initiate this program, funds could come from the Federal Home Loan Bank System or the Federal Reserve Banks, Treasury Department programs, or from state programs distributing federal funds.

As an example of a public-private partnership, SPOCH's HomeKeeper Turnkey Program would use TARP II or other government funds to (1) Purchase at a deep discount from mortgage holders nonperforming mortgage notes on New Jersey residences and pools of nonperforming mortgage notes; (2) Stop foreclosure and restore affordable homeownership for thousands of qualified, at risk homeowners whose unsuitable mortgage loan terms have resulted in foreclosure; (3) Recycle newly unaffordable subprime mortgages into performing, profitable mortgage loans which will be sold to the secondary mortgage market; and (4) Create jobs for displaced real estate professionals to administer the statewide program and by hiring new businesses to implement recommended green initiatives to modernize modest income homes (thereby reducing homeowners' long term costs for energy consumption). 

As a mortgage holder with unilateral modification authority,  SPOCH would appoint an HomeKeeper Counselor to meet with qualified homeowners to review options to foreclosure designed to preserve continued, affordable homeownership. The homeowner would provide authenticated updates to current employment and finances.  An FHA 203K property appraisal and inspection report would follow to confirm the home's current fair market value - as the basis for a structured loan modification that makes sense for all stakeholders.

 In the short term, the loan modification will result in reduced loan payments for the homeowner.  Over time, as the economy and housing markets improve, program participants will be required to adhere to a strict budget, and eventually return a portion of the home's appreciated value upon its sale or refinance.  The sale of modified, performing mortgages to the secondary market, and the assignment of owners' equity makes the HomeKeeper program self-funded and not dependent on subsequent government support.

David Petrovich is Executive Director of Society for Preservation of Continued Homeownership, a 501c3 non profit consumer advocacy, and author of Fight Foreclosure: How to cope with a mortgage you can't pay, Negotiate with your lender, and Save your home! (Wiley & Sons 2008)   For more information, E-mail  Mr. Petrovich or Jeffrey Ross Williams, Esq., a public policy advisor in Washington, DC, and Loch Arbor, New Jersey @ info@spoch.org

Comments(2)

Show All Comments Sort:
S W
Seattle, WA

David, BRILLIANT!! I like what you propose very much.

I feel like a "wicked" "unfriendly" person by noting that the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness as written in the constitution is not what people think it is... When it was written, "happiness" was not defined as the "pursuit of pleasure" or even the "pursuit of material possessions". "Happiness" was equated with living a life of virtue and the contentment that arises from living life in sync with one's beliefs, which at the time involved the freedom to worship as one chooses via the separation of church and state (note the distinction here from the separation of "faith and state" as it's often alluded to popularly today). "Happiness" involved living holistically integrated with one's religious beliefs, which meant that individuals were allowed to bring their whole person, including their faith, into their daily lives, such as work, play, and government.

I am very worried about equating happiness with the "ownership of material possessions". Home ownership is not intrinsic in "happiness". There are many who own homes and are miserable, extended to the max, because they interpreted "happiness" as "owning material possessions"... While owning things in of itself is not bad, defining happiness and success by what one owns can become toxic... Some people have committed suicide over the loss of their house.

I also worry that the "American Dream" as defined by the ownership of material possessions is contributing to the foolish financial stewardship going on in our country. If you have to "own" things to be happy, then we are in perilous times indeed. While much can be said about not living in poverty and the minimums required to have a relatively decent life, living a relatively decent life (non-poverty, health insurance, educational opportunities) does not necessarily equate with owning a home.

A cashier at my local organic store said one day, after I had an almost 12 hour day of showing homes to a client, that "work is like prostitution; we sell ourselves for money". She knew what she was talking about. As Americans, we're not living a "dream" at all by stretching ourselves thin to acquire things, and working like slaves to pay them off. The problem isn't our government, and it's not our jobs not paying us enough. The problem is much closer to home, in our thinking...

Feb 17, 2009 08:55 AM
Debra Kukulski, Broker Associate
RE/MAX Suburban - Cary, IL
SRES;SFR,CDPE;GRI;ABR;e-PRO Realtor, Northern IL

David, I agree....the actual homeowners in distress and possibly facing foreclosure need the most immediate help.

Mar 31, 2009 02:44 AM